Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

SS Cranks Question

Started by Ride-A-Lot · · Last activity · 69 posts · 1,737 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
16 October 2005
Last activity
20 October 2005
Original author
Ride-A-Lot
Posts
69
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,737
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–69 of 69
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Phil, Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:M_e5f.5928$vk1.752@dukeread04...

    Quoted message said:
    G.T. said:

    "GeeDubb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Ride-A-Lot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > GeeDubb wrote:
    >>
    >> "Ride-A-Lot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >> news:[email hidden]...
    >>> Max wrote:
    >>>> G.T. wrote:
    >>>>> I believe Zinn did a blind study of perception
    >>>>> and power awhile back.
    >>>>
    >>>> Speaking of Zinn, he addresses crank length here -
    >>>> http://www.insidetri.com/train/bike/articles/1875.0.html
    >>>
    >>> Ugh! I ain't measuring my femur or any other part of my body
    >>> (well almost) for that matter. I just went with what ever feels
    >>> best and since I have never used anything other than 175, that
    >>> feels best to me. Tri-geeks are always looking for a millimeter
    >>> of performance gain. As long as I can move my feet and get the
    >>> bike to go, I'm happy. If it requires that much effort to figure
    >>> out how long my cranks should be, then this isn't fun anymore.
    >>> Besides, if I felt the crank was too short I'd just lower my
    >>> seatpost the 5mm or vice versa.
    >>>
    >>> It doesn't have to be that difficult.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
    >>> www.schnauzers.ws
    >>
    >> But what about the upward motion? If you lower your seat then the
    >> top of the spin is affected. And please, PLEASE, don't give us any
    >> measurements.......
    >>
    >> Gary
    >
    > I'd have to see how that works. I don't see what the difference is
    > if I lower/raise my seat or get shorter/longer cranks. Wouldn't I
    > still be the same distance to the pedals? Granted, the upper body
    > geometry (shoulder angle to bars) would change, but for a 5'5" guy
    > 1/4" is not going to make a hill of beans. If it were that
    > important, I could add another +/-5 degree rise to the bars.
    >
    > --
    > o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
    > www.schnauzers.ws

    What happens is that your knees may start to bother you. I was
    having pain in the top of my knees. I raised the seat about 1/4"
    and the pain went away. Maybe is was a placebo effect, mostly
    mental, but the pain went away.

    I went through the same with my Turner. I was trying to run my seat
    as low as possible to help with COG, I started having knee pain, so I
    started raising my seatpost until the pain went away. And it did.

    Greg

    When you say COG do you really mean COG or do you mean maneuvering
    clearance? In other words, more easy to get back behind the saddle?

    COG, for high speed, pedaling twisty singletrack.

    Greg

  2. I've got Icon Sterling 180's and they're fairly heavy, but since I
    stand a lot, and weigh around 180lbs, they're ideal for me. Very
    strong, and look fairly cool, not that there's anything wrong with
    that.

    CDB

  3. You crack me up. Did you get wet last month?

    CDB

  4. Paladin said:

    You crack me up. Did you get wet last month?

    Since overbred yappy lap dogs are infamous for not doing much more than
    yapping, shaking and pissing on themselves, my bet would be on an
    affirmative.

    JD

  5. "Phil, Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:Kdl4f.2552

    Quoted message said:

    They likely are. Go ahead and rob them, but they'll be too long and


    you'll

    Quoted message said:

    need the 5 spacers mentioned above. Make sure the spacers are the same
    thickness. You don't want your chain climbing off due to a wonky


    chainring.

    Quoted message said:

    Make sure those bolts are tight, too, using the special nut-holder (heh


    heh)

    Quoted message said:

    tool that prevents it from spinning as you're tightening.

    (Late reply I know - still tryin' to catch up with the groups after time
    off!)

    When I built up my ancient steely with single front ring, I just ground some
    material off the tube nuts etc. to make 'em shorter. Easy enough done.

    Shaun aRe

  6. "Dean A. Stepper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:pmY4f.2192$UF4.1455@fed1read02...

    Quoted message said:

    The male part is not getting a good enough bite
    into the female part and stripping out easily.

    You're just lacking 'girth' Dean.

    Shaun aRe

  7. Shaun aRe said:

    (Late reply I know - still tryin' to catch up with the groups after
    time off!)

    ... I just ground some material off the tube nuts

    No wonder you were gone for a while!

    Bill "ice 'em...often" S.

  8. JD said:
    Phil said:
    JD said:

    I run RF TLP 180s on a couple of my other bikes and they are lasting
    well. I ran them on my SS and snapped three in the span of about 18
    months. SS requires drivetrain components that are much stronger
    than what works on geared bikes. Don't let some web-sales idiot
    tell you what works for you, especially when they don't know you or
    how you ride.

    JD

    Based on the stories and pictures, I've always wondered why you
    haven't just went ahead and gone with BMX cro-moly tubular steel
    cranks. Those I'm sure you'll never break.
    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

    I was considering Bullseyes, but they are over 3 Franklins a pop. The
    ENOs are standing up well, except for the stock chainring, which seems
    to be made from 6000 series aluminum. I'm going to replace it with
    steel soon. As far as Dean's comment about bling goes, I could care
    less about how shiny or expensive something is. I just want what
    works and I don't have to replace with great frequency.

    JD

    Check out FSA's BMX crankset here:

    http://www.fullspeedahead.com/fly.aspx?layout=product&taxid=88

    It's around $150 retail. Only problem would be the bottom bracket wearing
    out if the bearings are real small. Plus you need a specific BB.
    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  9. "JD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Dean A. Stepper said:

    No they loosen up after a few miles, I need to get over to the bike shop
    and
    get longer chainring bolts. The male part is not getting a good enough
    bite
    into the female part and stripping out easily.

    No, you need blue loctite.

    JD

    THAT'S gonna leave a mark.............

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.