General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Sweet Potatoes

Started by Brit · · Last activity · 131 posts · 2,290 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 November 2005
Last activity
7 December 2005
Original author
Brit
Posts
131
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,290
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 121–131 of 131
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. sarah bennett said:

    I have never understood the rationale for not eating flour on passover
    when you don't keep kosher. Or "keeping kosher" but not actually
    following the rules.

    There needn't be a rationale. How about people who go to church some
    Sundays but not every Sunday or people who purport to be religious but
    who lie, cheat and steal? I rather admire people who experiment with
    different religious practices such as following some kosher laws but not
    all of them until they find a level of observance that suits them. It
    makes sense to me to continue thinking about religion, spirituality,
    your own beliefs and your own practices throughout your life while
    learning and growing. I don't expect my religious practices to make
    sense to the next person. I'm sure someone else would accuse me of
    being terribly inconsistent, but it works for me.

    Let me go out on a limb here and wonder if part of the problem is when
    someone expects you to accomodate their religious practices when you
    can't make heads or tails of them. I know it used to drive me crazy
    when I had customers who told me how they were strict vegetarians and
    were adamant that I give them special food, but when I gave them exactly
    what they wanted, they'd still complain. I'd find that they weren't that
    careful when they were cooking, only when I was. When it comes to that,
    I try to become dispassionate: Just tell the truth about what
    ingredients I've used and let decide how they feel about it. Thus with
    bringing dessert to a Passover seder. I checked with the hosts and
    brought a dessert that used no dairy and no grain. I was only sorry
    that they prefered the dry, tasteless, wheatless, eggy, spongecake.

    --Lia

  2. Julia Altshuler said:
    sarah bennett said:

    I have never understood the rationale for not eating flour on passover
    when you don't keep kosher. Or "keeping kosher" but not actually
    following the rules.

    There needn't be a rationale. How about people who go to church some
    Sundays but not every Sunday or people who purport to be religious but
    who lie, cheat and steal? I rather admire people who experiment with
    different religious practices such as following some kosher laws but not
    all of them until they find a level of observance that suits them. It
    makes sense to me to continue thinking about religion, spirituality,
    your own beliefs and your own practices throughout your life while
    learning and growing. I don't expect my religious practices to make
    sense to the next person. I'm sure someone else would accuse me of
    being terribly inconsistent, but it works for me.

    I'm not saying I don't respect their desicions, I just dont understand
    it. 🙂

    Quoted message said:

    Let me go out on a limb here and wonder if part of the problem is when
    someone expects you to accomodate their religious practices when you
    can't make heads or tails of them. I know it used to drive me crazy
    when I had customers who told me how they were strict vegetarians and
    were adamant that I give them special food, but when I gave them exactly
    what they wanted, they'd still complain.

    Like my vegan SIL who complains that all the vegan desserts I have made
    are "too dry". well, when you can't use milk or butter or eggs, it is
    hard to make anything decent IMO.

    Quoted message said:

    I'd find that they weren't that
    careful when they were cooking, only when I was. When it comes to that,
    I try to become dispassionate: Just tell the truth about what
    ingredients I've used and let decide how they feel about it. Thus with
    bringing dessert to a Passover seder. I checked with the hosts and
    brought a dessert that used no dairy and no grain. I was only sorry
    that they prefered the dry, tasteless, wheatless, eggy, spongecake.

    Well, my mom makes a couple of really nice spongecakes, but I think I
    would have tried your dessert, too 🙂

    --

    saerah

    "Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a
    disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice."
    -Baruch Spinoza

    "There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly
    what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear
    and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There
    is another theory which states that this has already happened."
    -Douglas Adams

  3. sarah bennett said:


    Like my vegan SIL who complains that all the vegan desserts I have made
    are "too dry". well, when you can't use milk or butter or eggs, it is
    hard to make anything decent IMO.

    Stuff like this frustrates me, I've dne my share of vegetarian, vegan, atkins,
    weirdkins, diabetic, emotional issue cooking in my time and I totally feel
    that if someone goes out of their way to cook something in a special way to
    comply with your needs you should not complain. If you want it done a specific
    way you either have to accept the way it is served or make it yourself.

    grumble grumble

    --
    ..:Heather:.
    www.velvet-c.com

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    The Bubbo said:
    sarah bennett said:


    Like my vegan SIL who complains that all the vegan desserts I have made
    are "too dry". well, when you can't use milk or butter or eggs, it is
    hard to make anything decent IMO.

    Quoted message said:

    Stuff like this frustrates me, I've dne my share of vegetarian, vegan, atkins,
    weirdkins, diabetic, emotional issue cooking in my time and I totally feel
    that if someone goes out of their way to cook something in a special way to
    comply with your needs you should not complain. If you want it done a specific
    way you either have to accept the way it is served or make it yourself.

    One of the best oatmeal cookies I've ever had was vegan. Still, I'm
    glad my daughter gave it up (after nine months). It made Thanksgiving
    so much easier. Butter in this, butter in that, butter in everything.
    Cheese sauce on the brussels sprouts. She's still vegetarian, which
    means more leftover turkey for the rest of us.

    Besides, it isn't hard to make sweet potatoes vegan. Just add the
    butter or fake butter at the table, according to each person's
    preference.

    --
    Dan Abel
    [email hidden]
    Petaluma, California, USA

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Julia Altshuler said:

    I rather admire people who experiment with
    different religious practices such as following some kosher laws but not
    all of them until they find a level of observance that suits them.

    I'm with you until the last part. I think part of observance is
    trying to live up to a standard given by the faith, not just what we can
    live with ourselves.

    Regards,
    Ranee

    Remove do not & spam to e-mail me.

    "She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13

    http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
    http://talesfromthekitchen.blogspot.com/

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Elaine Parrish said:

    South America isn't the New World. The "New World" consisted of the
    colonies that eventually became the US. The early colonists were English
    and the English didn't eat potatoes. Potatoes were grown in Ireland long
    before they came to the colonies.

    Okay. Tell that to the makers of those maps, who were from the "Old
    World" and thought they had gotten to the "New World" before they hit
    the colonies.

    Regards,
    Ranee

    Remove do not & spam to e-mail me.

    "She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13

    http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
    http://talesfromthekitchen.blogspot.com/

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Elaine Parrish said:

    So, even if potatoes were indigenous to South America (the continent),
    they
    still had to migrate to England and be introduced to America ("the
    colonies"; later the US). So they may be American, but they are not
    American <g>. The total and complete problem lies with our forefathers
    who could not think up a name for us that could be readily distinguished
    from our continent. We are Americans just like the Mexicans or Canadians.
    Technically, we should be called United Stateseons, but that sounds funny.
    Many times when we speak of America, we only mean the US, which is what I
    was doing. From any International point of view, it would be reasonable to
    think of the continent as a whole.

    No, the problem is that you read US, when I (and others) wrote New
    World.

    Regards,
    Ranee

    Remove do not & spam to e-mail me.

    "She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13

    http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
    http://talesfromthekitchen.blogspot.com/

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Elaine Parrish said:

    Yes, and that is interesting. I was watching Alton Brown's Good Eats show
    last night and it was about sweet potatoes. He said (well, actually it
    was the lady that is a food scientist) that Christopher
    Columbus took the sweet potato back home with him and it began to make
    its way around Europe. When it finally got to England, the name, batata,
    had been corrupted into patata and the English further corrupted it into
    potato. Most of Europe would not eat regular potatoes because they were
    thought to be poisonous. But the Irish ate them. The Americans were eating
    sweet potatoes, which they called "potatoes". When the Irish immigrants
    came and re-introduced regular potatoes (actually real potatoes) in
    Boston, the sweet potato (formallly, just "potato"😉 got the additional
    name of "sweet". I love "Good Eats" and should have cited it as my source
    for that statement.

    So, you're saying (and him, I guess) that these people who came from
    England and Ireland and even parts of Germany came to the colonies,
    forgot entirely about the potatoes they ate at home, and thought these
    new ones were the only ones they'd ever had?

    Regards,
    Ranee

    Remove do not & spam to e-mail me.

    "She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13

    http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
    http://talesfromthekitchen.blogspot.com/

  9. Ranee Mueller said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Elaine Parrish said:

    Yes, and that is interesting. I was watching Alton Brown's Good Eats show
    last night and it was about sweet potatoes. He said (well, actually it
    was the lady that is a food scientist) that Christopher
    Columbus took the sweet potato back home with him and it began to make
    its way around Europe. When it finally got to England, the name, batata,
    had been corrupted into patata and the English further corrupted it into
    potato. Most of Europe would not eat regular potatoes because they were
    thought to be poisonous. But the Irish ate them. The Americans were eating
    sweet potatoes, which they called "potatoes". When the Irish immigrants
    came and re-introduced regular potatoes (actually real potatoes) in
    Boston, the sweet potato (formallly, just "potato"😉 got the additional
    name of "sweet". I love "Good Eats" and should have cited it as my source
    for that statement.

    So, you're saying (and him, I guess) that these people who came from
    England and Ireland and even parts of Germany came to the colonies,
    forgot entirely about the potatoes they ate at home, and thought these
    new ones were the only ones they'd ever had?

    Regards,
    Ranee

    Having a bad day, Ranee?

    There were dozens of posts on this thread. If you will check your time
    line, you will find that Columbus discovered America in 1492, sailing for
    Spain. The Spaniards began explorations of the "New World" (two
    continents). They found potatoes on the South American Continent and took
    them back to Spain where they became a food staple for hospital inmates
    (and various and sundry other "poor people"😉. The rest of Europe was not
    eating potatoes at the time. Spain introduced the potato to Europe in the
    1500s. It didn't catch on readily because it was of the nightshade family of
    poisonous plants. It did become successful in Spain as the "food of the
    poor", which made it even more objectable to the more well-to-do
    Europeans. The potato "bounced around Europe for a couple of hundred
    years" (Alton Brown's Good Eats) before it was embraced by the Irish.

    Note the timeline here. 1500s plus "a couple hundred years" = the
    1700s. The colonies were established in the early 1600s.

    Once the Irish embraced the potato (ca.1780s), it took almost another 100
    years for it to become the base of the Irish foodstores. The Irish
    introduced it to the English "from the bottom up" (society-wise).

    1700s plus 100 years = 1800s

    When the potato famine hit Ireland in the early/mid 1800s, many Irish fled
    to "the new world of North America" and came to the US, bringing with them
    the potato.

    And yes, while it was discovered in the New World (South American
    Continent), it took some 300 years for it to come to the New World (North
    American continent).

    Alton Brown's Good Eats Program

    and:

    http://www.indepthinfo.com/potato/history.shtml

    Elaine, too

  10. On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:59:11 -0800, in rec.food.cooking, Ranee Mueller

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Elaine Parrish said:

    South America isn't the New World. The "New World" consisted of the
    colonies that eventually became the US. The early colonists were English
    and the English didn't eat potatoes. Potatoes were grown in Ireland long
    before they came to the colonies.

    Okay. Tell that to the makers of those maps, who were from the "Old
    World" and thought they had gotten to the "New World" before they hit
    the colonies.


    South America is of course part of the 'New World'. So is Canada.
    The term comes from Peter Martyr's 'New World Chronicles'

    http://www.athenapub.com/martyr1.htm

    Potatoes, though grown sporadically during the 1600s in North America,
    only gained popularity after 1719 it appears.
    http://www.potatoes.com/Educational.cfm?Section=Growing-History.cfm

    Doug
    --
    Doug Weller -- exorcise the demon to reply
    Doug & Helen's Dogs http://www.dougandhelen.com
    A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com
    Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk

  11. sf said:
    Elaine Parrish said:

    When it finally got to England, the name, batata, had been corrupted
    into patata and the English further corrupted it into potato.


    persoanlly I preferi it in his taste and even
    salty sometimes :-D
    in italy they use Nutella or with whipped cream

    Quoted message said:

    <singing> Tomato, tomata, Potato, patata... (if you don't know the
    the reference isn't to Harry & Sally, you're *way* too young)

    maybe not
    hemmm oh MY GOD , YEEEEEEES hummm ahhhhh!

    Quoted message said:

    Practice safe eating. Always use condiments.


    and safe sex too :-D use C...... :-)

    --

    Theo

    sorridere rilassa:it.hobby.umorismo
    o vai da :
    http://www.easybonsai.it

    I am perfect in everyway even in humbleness &
    modesty(© ¼ with Garry)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.