In article <[email hidden]>,
41 said:Tim McNamara said:Jobst uses a wooden standoff between the seatpost and the
saddlebag. I found this less than ideal (the standoff can fall out
unless attached to the toe strap) and instead I use a section of
PVC pipe; the toe strap runs through the pipe, around the seatpost
and through the loop on the bag. It's very secure and the bag
tends to swing less that with the wooden standoff. I sometimes
just strap it right to the seat post, as I don't notice the bag
touching the backs of my legs after a while. I also have a Baggins
Hoss, about twice the capacity of the Nelson, and that has no
option other than strapping it to the seatpost.
Why?
Because of the shape of it. The photo on the Web site doesn't really
show the profile well, but basically the compartment is extended forward
under the saddle compared to the Carradice.
http://www.rivbike.com/webalog/baggage_racks/20078.html
Putting a standoff in between the seatpost and the bag would make it
stick out really far. Hmmm, I'll have to see if I can post some better
pictures on the Web somewhere.
Quoted message said:Could you perhaps post some sort of overall review of your Hoss? The
Rivendell site is rather thin on details and it seems there are major
differences between the Carradice and Rivendell designs. Those of us
contemplating purchasing such a large bag are wondering. What about
using the Hoss with an SQR or Bagman?
The Hoss and the Adam are huge, bigger than any Carradice I've ever
seen. I've seen cars with trunks (boots for those who speak English)
smaller than my Hoss. ;-) I have a first generation Hoss, but I think
the changes are minor between it and the current ones.
The bag is very well made. The sewing appears very strong. There is a
large, flat-bottomed main compartment and two large side pockets. It
opens like a trunk, from the top and offes a 6" deep "lip" at the
opening to keep stuff inside. The leather straps and reinforcement are
very stiff. The Hoss is large enough that it can benefit from a
stiffener in the bottom- an 11 x 14 inch piece of Coroplast works
nicely. The hardware is all solid brass. The Hoss does not have a
waterproof liner and instead relies on waxed canvas for water
resistance. When you open the main flap, there are "flaplets" on three
sides of the opening that can be tied shut if needed. There are eyelets
for shock cord, which is what I use, and they can be used to provide
some structure to the bag and reduce or prevent sagging.
A Carradice has a sort of rounded bottom and sort of lays at an angle,
which can allow stuff to fall out when the flap is opened. My Nelson LF
holds about half as much stuff, which is both good and bad- good in that
it makes you very selective about what you take, bad in that what you
need might not all fit. The Carradice has a plastic stiffener that runs
the full shape of the compartment and gives the bag more structure than
the Hoss has.
Aesthetics are in the eye of the beholder. The Carradice looks very
"classic" but I prefer the warmer colors of the Hoss. The Hoss looks
just huge on a bike, absolutely immense. I'll have to post some photos
to one of my Web sites.
Since I am tall and ride frames > 60 cm, I've never looked into the SQR
or Bagman bag carriers. To me it just seems like more weight, more
complexity, and more stuff to go wrong. Rivendell has commissioned a QR
saddlebag mount based on Jobst/Peter Johnson's design. The pictures
look nice, although it would probably weigh double what Jobst's does
given that it uses a hub QR screwer to secure the bag. If I had an
issue with the bag dragging on the rear tire, then I'd use a small or
standard pannier rack or a sturdy rear fender to support the bottom of
the bag.
Quoted message said:I take it that since you use it chiefly for groceries, you find its
design not satisfactory for touring. Is thigh rub the only reason?
No, I just haven't gone on a tour since I bought it. When I do have
time to go, I am planning on using it.