Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: Vandeman calls mountain bikers "liars" and "criminals" then surprised by hate mail!

Started by Edward Dolan · · Last activity · 28 posts · 1,011 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
25 May 2006
Last activity
12 June 2006
Original author
Edward Dolan
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,011
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:mR0dg.14483$B42.1484@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    They haven't so far. The National Forest Service management rulings came
    out last year and allow bicycle access coordinated through local land
    managers. What that means, mr. notsogreat, is that off-road cycling has
    been recognized as a viable, non-motorized method of exploring many of
    the parks and trails in the Country.
    Local organizations are cooperating between cycling, hiking, equestrian
    and other environmental preservation groups for the larger picture of
    slowing sprawl and construction rather than bickering on how to access a
    trail. Yours and Vandeman's hatred of off-road cyclists' has done
    nothing but galvenize cyclists into a cohesive and educated block of
    individuals with real information to counter the slander and bias that
    once was taken for granted. You, Vandeman and myself will be gone at
    some point, but with the help of recreationists' interests, perhaps some
    of the natural space will be preserved well beyond our parting. If you
    want to spend the rest of your days whining about your "sacred"
    footpaths, go forth and do so. Just always remember, your voice is no
    more important than mine.

    Mountain bikers are their own worst enemies. They will self-destruct like
    all slobs do and eventually be banned from all hiking trails. The
    wilderness and my sacred footpaths are for the cognoscenti, not for slob
    mountain bikers. It takes brains to be able to appreciate wilderness,
    something that mountain bikers sorely lack.

    It must not take a lot of brains... You claim to do it.

    Not everyone can be a genius like me. You are forgiven your ignorance since
    it is the common lot of mankind.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > I would like to remind you that we humans came out of the wild
    > ourselves and, in fact, we are just about the only wild animals left on
    > the surface of the earth. What is needed is a genetics program to
    > domesticate ourselves, the same way we have domesticated sheep and all
    > the other farm animals. A wild animal in its' natural habitat is way
    > too good for the likes of you. You belong in a pig pen with all the
    > other pigs.

    You HAVE been overexposed to Vandeman. Now you are just making
    non-statements and vague threats of reference. You better have some warm
    milk and calm down. That button on the headboard will ring the nurse and
    she will bring your medication.

    You need to read, besides "1984", "Brave New World", after which you will
    despair of mankind as I have. The only solution for what ails us is
    death. Long Live Death!


    You need to read a comic book. Or be in one...

    There is no substitute for reading our betters. It is just about the only
    way we ever learn anything. For instance, I will never learn anything from
    you on these freaking newsgroups. If you want to make an impression on me,
    you will have to get busy and write many volumes like Gibbon (The Decline
    and Fall of the Roman Empire) and Toynbee (A Study of History) did. Then,
    and only then, will I perhaps take you seriously. I urge you to get to work
    writing a definitive multi-volume work on the impact of mountain biking in
    the modern world. Who knows, once you embark on this great work, you may end
    up in the same corner as Vandeman and me.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  2. "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:mR0dg.14483$B42.1484@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >
    > They haven't so far. The National Forest Service management rulings
    > came out last year and allow bicycle access coordinated through local
    > land managers. What that means, mr. notsogreat, is that off-road
    > cycling has been recognized as a viable, non-motorized method of
    > exploring many of the parks and trails in the Country.
    > Local organizations are cooperating between cycling, hiking, equestrian
    > and other environmental preservation groups for the larger picture of
    > slowing sprawl and construction rather than bickering on how to access
    > a trail. Yours and Vandeman's hatred of off-road cyclists' has done
    > nothing but galvenize cyclists into a cohesive and educated block of
    > individuals with real information to counter the slander and bias that
    > once was taken for granted. You, Vandeman and myself will be gone at
    > some point, but with the help of recreationists' interests, perhaps
    > some of the natural space will be preserved well beyond our parting. If
    > you want to spend the rest of your days whining about your "sacred"
    > footpaths, go forth and do so. Just always remember, your voice is no
    > more important than mine.

    Mountain bikers are their own worst enemies. They will self-destruct
    like all slobs do and eventually be banned from all hiking trails. The
    wilderness and my sacred footpaths are for the cognoscenti, not for slob
    mountain bikers. It takes brains to be able to appreciate wilderness,
    something that mountain bikers sorely lack.

    It must not take a lot of brains... You claim to do it.

    Not everyone can be a genius like me. You are forgiven your ignorance
    since it is the common lot of mankind.

    Whew... Conan the Librarian forgives me... Oh thank the Lord and pass the
    gravy...
    When you say "genius"... You mean as in "Wile E. Coyote" genius... Don't
    ya?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> I would like to remind you that we humans came out of the wild
    >> ourselves and, in fact, we are just about the only wild animals left
    >> on the surface of the earth. What is needed is a genetics program to
    >> domesticate ourselves, the same way we have domesticated sheep and all
    >> the other farm animals. A wild animal in its' natural habitat is way
    >> too good for the likes of you. You belong in a pig pen with all the
    >> other pigs.
    >
    > You HAVE been overexposed to Vandeman. Now you are just making
    > non-statements and vague threats of reference. You better have some
    > warm milk and calm down. That button on the headboard will ring the
    > nurse and she will bring your medication.

    You need to read, besides "1984", "Brave New World", after which you
    will despair of mankind as I have. The only solution for what ails us is
    death. Long Live Death!


    You need to read a comic book. Or be in one...

    There is no substitute for reading our betters. It is just about the only
    way we ever learn anything. For instance, I will never learn anything from
    you on these freaking newsgroups. If you want to make an impression on me,
    you will have to get busy and write many volumes like Gibbon (The Decline
    and Fall of the Roman Empire) and Toynbee (A Study of History) did. Then,
    and only then, will I perhaps take you seriously. I urge you to get to
    work writing a definitive multi-volume work on the impact of mountain
    biking in the modern world. Who knows, once you embark on this great work,
    you may end up in the same corner as Vandeman and me.


    Since there is no substitute for "reading our betters", I can certainly stop
    reading your posts... As you are of no consequence and certainly not my
    "better".

  3. "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:hTodg.14538$B42.10168@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:


    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:mR0dg.14483$B42.1484@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:

    >>
    >> They haven't so far. The National Forest Service management rulings
    >> came out last year and allow bicycle access coordinated through local
    >> land managers. What that means, mr. notsogreat, is that off-road
    >> cycling has been recognized as a viable, non-motorized method of
    >> exploring many of the parks and trails in the Country.
    >> Local organizations are cooperating between cycling, hiking,
    >> equestrian and other environmental preservation groups for the larger
    >> picture of slowing sprawl and construction rather than bickering on
    >> how to access a trail. Yours and Vandeman's hatred of off-road
    >> cyclists' has done nothing but galvenize cyclists into a cohesive and
    >> educated block of individuals with real information to counter the
    >> slander and bias that once was taken for granted. You, Vandeman and
    >> myself will be gone at some point, but with the help of
    >> recreationists' interests, perhaps some of the natural space will be
    >> preserved well beyond our parting. If you want to spend the rest of
    >> your days whining about your "sacred" footpaths, go forth and do so.
    >> Just always remember, your voice is no more important than mine.
    >
    > Mountain bikers are their own worst enemies. They will self-destruct
    > like all slobs do and eventually be banned from all hiking trails. The
    > wilderness and my sacred footpaths are for the cognoscenti, not for
    > slob mountain bikers. It takes brains to be able to appreciate
    > wilderness, something that mountain bikers sorely lack.

    It must not take a lot of brains... You claim to do it.

    Not everyone can be a genius like me. You are forgiven your ignorance
    since it is the common lot of mankind.

    Whew... Conan the Librarian forgives me... Oh thank the Lord and pass
    the gravy...
    When you say "genius"... You mean as in "Wile E. Coyote" genius... Don't
    ya?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    >>> I would like to remind you that we humans came out of the wild
    >>> ourselves and, in fact, we are just about the only wild animals left
    >>> on the surface of the earth. What is needed is a genetics program to
    >>> domesticate ourselves, the same way we have domesticated sheep and
    >>> all the other farm animals. A wild animal in its' natural habitat is
    >>> way too good for the likes of you. You belong in a pig pen with all
    >>> the other pigs.
    >>
    >> You HAVE been overexposed to Vandeman. Now you are just making
    >> non-statements and vague threats of reference. You better have some
    >> warm milk and calm down. That button on the headboard will ring the
    >> nurse and she will bring your medication.
    >
    > You need to read, besides "1984", "Brave New World", after which you
    > will despair of mankind as I have. The only solution for what ails us
    > is death. Long Live Death!
    >
    You need to read a comic book. Or be in one...

    There is no substitute for reading our betters. It is just about the only
    way we ever learn anything. For instance, I will never learn anything
    from you on these freaking newsgroups. If you want to make an impression
    on me, you will have to get busy and write many volumes like Gibbon (The
    Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) and Toynbee (A Study of History)
    did. Then, and only then, will I perhaps take you seriously. I urge you
    to get to work writing a definitive multi-volume work on the impact of
    mountain biking in the modern world. Who knows, once you embark on this
    great work, you may end up in the same corner as Vandeman and me.


    Since there is no substitute for "reading our betters", I can certainly
    stop reading your posts... As you are of no consequence and certainly not
    my "better".

    I have gathered from your woeful lack of intelligence that you only read
    junk science research which purports to show that biking and hiking are one
    and the same thing - when any fool knows they are vastly different.

    Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was written
    several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being written today is
    not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest you begin with
    Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the 19th century. Anything
    written after 1900 is not good for you and will make you even worse than you
    already are. I plead with you to get some culture and to give up your slob
    mountain biking ways.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

    PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history of the
    impact of mountain biking on the modern world.

  4. Does anyone else hear a gnat...?

    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have gathered from your woeful lack of intelligence that you only read
    junk science research which purports to show that biking and hiking are
    one and the same thing - when any fool knows they are vastly different.


    ....as opposed to junk science research which purports to show only that
    biking is more harmful than hiking....?
    Since you and MV are proclaiming the differences, it looks as if you are
    also the "fool" you reference.

    Quoted message said:


    Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being written
    today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest you begin
    with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the 19th century.
    Anything written after 1900 is not good for you and will make you even
    worse than you already are. I plead with you to get some culture and to
    give up your slob mountain biking ways.

    So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at Vandeman's
    webpage.

    Quoted message said:


    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

    PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history of
    the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.


    At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word history of
    the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first hand....

  5. "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:F8%dg.14666$B42.11235@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone else hear a gnat...?

    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have gathered from your woeful lack of intelligence that you only read
    junk science research which purports to show that biking and hiking are
    one and the same thing - when any fool knows they are vastly different.

    ...as opposed to junk science research which purports to show only that
    biking is more harmful than hiking....?
    Since you and MV are proclaiming the differences, it looks as if you are
    also the "fool" you reference.

    Mountain bikers are into nothing but fun and games. Hikers are philosophers
    who are into deep thinking about humankind and the universe. They certainly
    do not belong on the same trails together.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being
    written today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest you
    begin with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the 19th
    century. Anything written after 1900 is not good for you and will make
    you even worse than you already are. I plead with you to get some culture
    and to give up your slob mountain biking ways.

    So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at Vandeman's
    webpage.

    Quoted message said:

    PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history of
    the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.


    At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word history
    of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first hand...

    Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against the
    experience of many others. Those who write books have generally thought
    about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more writing and maybe
    you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in this world. I assure
    you that mountain biking matters hardly at all whereas what the Great Ed
    Dolan thinks matters enormously.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  6. "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:F8%dg.14666$B42.11235@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone else hear a gnat...?

    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have gathered from your woeful lack of intelligence that you only read
    junk science research which purports to show that biking and hiking are
    one and the same thing - when any fool knows they are vastly different.

    ...as opposed to junk science research which purports to show only that
    biking is more harmful than hiking....?
    Since you and MV are proclaiming the differences, it looks as if you are
    also the "fool" you reference.

    Mountain bikers are into nothing but fun and games. Hikers are
    philosophers who are into deep thinking about humankind and the universe.
    They certainly do not belong on the same trails together.


    Hmmm... A lot of the hikers I see are loud, walking all over the trail and
    off it, leaving trash behind, carrying and drinking alcohol, being careless
    about their own safety and others... Yep. Hikers are certainly the cream
    of the crop of humanity.
    Don't insult us with your wishful generalizations. You may venture out with
    that frame of mind, but do NOT place all hikers in that very small subset.
    And, by the same logic, you can not reference all off-road cyclists' motives
    based on either your opinion of the activity or the actions of a minority to
    which you may (or simply claim to) witness.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being
    written today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest
    you begin with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the 19th
    century. Anything written after 1900 is not good for you and will make
    you even worse than you already are. I plead with you to get some
    culture and to give up your slob mountain biking ways.

    So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at Vandeman's
    webpage.

    Quoted message said:

    PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history of
    the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.


    At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word history
    of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first hand...

    Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against
    the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more writing
    and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in this
    world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all whereas
    what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.

    ...and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are not
    "Edward F. Dolan".)

    Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see some
    trees. As far as what the "not so great ed dolan (Conan the Librarian)"
    thinks about anything...
    http://www.weirdlittlebiscuit.com/images/b3ta/donkey.jpg

    Quoted message said:
  7. Edward Dolan said:


    "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:F8%dg.14666$B42.11235@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone else hear a gnat...?

    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have gathered from your woeful lack of intelligence that you only read
    junk science research which purports to show that biking and hiking are
    one and the same thing - when any fool knows they are vastly different.

    ...as opposed to junk science research which purports to show only that
    biking is more harmful than hiking....?
    Since you and MV are proclaiming the differences, it looks as if you are
    also the "fool" you reference.

    Mountain bikers are into nothing but fun and games. Hikers are
    philosophers who are into deep thinking about humankind and the universe.
    They certainly do not belong on the same trails together.

    Dolan,
    Do you have a single brain cell that isn't confused by it's own delusion of
    greatness?
    I ride to the mountains just to enjoy the isolation and sounds of nature,
    not traffic.
    Bill Baka

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being
    written today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest
    you begin with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the 19th
    century. Anything written after 1900 is not good for you and will make
    you even worse than you already are. I plead with you to get some
    culture and to give up your slob mountain biking ways.

    So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at Vandeman's
    webpage.

    Quoted message said:

    PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history of
    the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.


    At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word history
    of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first hand...

    Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against
    the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more writing
    and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in this
    world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all whereas
    what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  8. On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:57:55 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:F8%dg.14666$B42.11235@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone else hear a gnat...?

    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > I have gathered from your woeful lack of intelligence that you only read
    > junk science research which purports to show that biking and hiking are
    > one and the same thing - when any fool knows they are vastly different.

    ...as opposed to junk science research which purports to show only that
    biking is more harmful than hiking....?
    Since you and MV are proclaiming the differences, it looks as if you are
    also the "fool" you reference.

    Mountain bikers are into nothing but fun and games. Hikers are
    philosophers who are into deep thinking about humankind and the universe.
    They certainly do not belong on the same trails together.


    Hmmm... A lot of the hikers I see are loud, walking all over the trail and
    off it, leaving trash behind, carrying and drinking alcohol, being careless
    about their own safety and others... Yep. Hikers are certainly the cream
    of the crop of humanity.
    Don't insult us with your wishful generalizations. You may venture out with
    that frame of mind, but do NOT place all hikers in that very small subset.
    And, by the same logic, you can not reference all off-road cyclists' motives
    based on either your opinion of the activity or the actions of a minority to
    which you may (or simply claim to) witness.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    > written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being
    > written today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest
    > you begin with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the 19th
    > century. Anything written after 1900 is not good for you and will make
    > you even worse than you already are. I plead with you to get some
    > culture and to give up your slob mountain biking ways.

    So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at Vandeman's
    webpage.

    > PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history of
    > the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.
    >
    >
    At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word history
    of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first hand...

    Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against
    the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more writing
    and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in this
    world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all whereas
    what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.

    ..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are not
    "Edward F. Dolan".)

    Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see some
    trees.

    Since when is it necessary to bring along a BIKE in order to see
    trees??? In fact, having to pay attention to controlling a BIKE
    interferes with your ability to look at trees -- if you were honest.

    As far as what the "not so great ed dolan (Conan the Librarian)"

    Quoted message said:

    thinks about anything...
    http://www.weirdlittlebiscuit.com/images/b3ta/donkey.jpg

    Quoted message said:



    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  9. "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:57:55 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>
    > At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word
    > history
    > of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    > No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    > hand...

    Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against
    the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more
    writing
    and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in this
    world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all whereas
    what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.

    ..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are not
    "Edward F. Dolan".)

    Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see
    some
    trees.

    Since when is it necessary to bring along a BIKE in order to see
    trees??? In fact, having to pay attention to controlling a BIKE
    interferes with your ability to look at trees -- if you were honest.


    We've covered this - Your OPINION and lack of desire or ability is no
    measure of the abilities of someone else. I can control a bike and look at
    trees. Your lack of that ability, or desire to explore that ability, is
    MEANINGLESS.
    Since when is it necessary to use any type of tool to increase the
    effectiveness of an activity?

    Quoted message said:
  10. On Tue, 30 May 2006 14:48:43 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:57:55 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    >>>
    >> At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word
    >> history
    >> of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    >> No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    >> hand...
    >
    > Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against
    > the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    > thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more
    > writing
    > and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in this
    > world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all whereas
    > what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.

    ..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are not
    "Edward F. Dolan".)

    Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see
    some
    trees.

    Since when is it necessary to bring along a BIKE in order to see
    trees??? In fact, having to pay attention to controlling a BIKE
    interferes with your ability to look at trees -- if you were honest.


    We've covered this - Your OPINION and lack of desire or ability is no
    measure of the abilities of someone else. I can control a bike and look at
    trees. Your lack of that ability, or desire to explore that ability, is
    MEANINGLESS.
    Since when is it necessary to use any type of tool to increase the
    effectiveness of an activity?

    So you agree that it's not necessary to allow bikes off-road?
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  11. "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 30 May 2006 14:48:43 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:57:55 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>
    >>>>
    >>> At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word
    >>> history
    >>> of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    >>> No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    >>> hand...
    >>
    >> Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked
    >> against
    >> the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    >> thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more
    >> writing
    >> and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in this
    >> world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all whereas
    >> what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.
    >
    >..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are
    >not
    >"Edward F. Dolan".)
    >
    >Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see
    >some
    >trees.

    Since when is it necessary to bring along a BIKE in order to see
    trees??? In fact, having to pay attention to controlling a BIKE
    interferes with your ability to look at trees -- if you were honest.


    We've covered this - Your OPINION and lack of desire or ability is no
    measure of the abilities of someone else. I can control a bike and look at
    trees. Your lack of that ability, or desire to explore that ability, is
    MEANINGLESS.
    Since when is it necessary to use any type of tool to increase the
    effectiveness of an activity?

    So you agree that it's not necessary to allow bikes off-road?
    ===


    Who said it was "necessary"...? Making something "necessary" (required, so
    to speak) is a far cry from making, or keeping, it legal as an option. Your
    insistence that it be banned simply because you do not choose to utilize it
    as a tool is not necessary, either. The off-road bicycle is a tool, just as
    a backpack or canteen is a tool. A loaded pack often weighs as much as a
    bicycle. You argue for banning one tool based on your OPINIONS, which have
    not been PROVEN to be anything but opinions. You scoff at other research,
    often conducted by accredited researchers, if it counters your OPINIONS than
    rally behind a battle of verbage and semantics when you get called on these
    opinions.
    What has been proven unnecessary are your writings, submissions and
    opinions. Road construction continues. Sprawl continues. Habitat destruction
    continues. And the ONLY thing you continue is to whine about bicycles...
    That is no longer pathetic... It is simply a waste.

  12. On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:01:46 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 30 May 2006 14:48:43 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:57:55 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>
    >>>>>
    >>>> At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word
    >>>> history
    >>>> of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    >>>> No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    >>>> hand...
    >>>
    >>> Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked
    >>> against
    >>> the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    >>> thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more
    >>> writing
    >>> and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in this
    >>> world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all whereas
    >>> what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.
    >>
    >>..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are
    >>not
    >>"Edward F. Dolan".)
    >>
    >>Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see
    >>some
    >>trees.
    >
    > Since when is it necessary to bring along a BIKE in order to see
    > trees??? In fact, having to pay attention to controlling a BIKE
    > interferes with your ability to look at trees -- if you were honest.
    We've covered this - Your OPINION and lack of desire or ability is no
    measure of the abilities of someone else. I can control a bike and look at
    trees. Your lack of that ability, or desire to explore that ability, is
    MEANINGLESS.
    Since when is it necessary to use any type of tool to increase the
    effectiveness of an activity?

    So you agree that it's not necessary to allow bikes off-road?
    ===


    Who said it was "necessary"...? Making something "necessary" (required, so
    to speak) is a far cry from making, or keeping, it legal as an option. Your
    insistence that it be banned simply because you do not choose to utilize it
    as a tool is not necessary, either. The off-road bicycle is a tool, just as
    a backpack or canteen is a tool. A loaded pack often weighs as much as a
    bicycle. You argue for banning one tool based on your OPINIONS, which have
    not been PROVEN to be anything but opinions. You scoff at other research,
    often conducted by accredited researchers, if it counters your OPINIONS than
    rally behind a battle of verbage and semantics when you get called on these
    opinions.
    What has been proven unnecessary are your writings, submissions and
    opinions. Road construction continues. Sprawl continues. Habitat destruction
    continues. And the ONLY thing you continue is to whine about bicycles...
    That is no longer pathetic... It is simply a waste.

    Did you say something?
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  13. "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:iMjeg.14944$B42.5477@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:


    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:F8%dg.14666$B42.11235@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone else hear a gnat...?

    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > I have gathered from your woeful lack of intelligence that you only
    > read junk science research which purports to show that biking and
    > hiking are one and the same thing - when any fool knows they are vastly
    > different.

    ...as opposed to junk science research which purports to show only that
    biking is more harmful than hiking....?
    Since you and MV are proclaiming the differences, it looks as if you are
    also the "fool" you reference.

    Mountain bikers are into nothing but fun and games. Hikers are
    philosophers who are into deep thinking about humankind and the universe.
    They certainly do not belong on the same trails together.


    Hmmm... A lot of the hikers I see are loud, walking all over the trail
    and off it, leaving trash behind, carrying and drinking alcohol, being
    careless about their own safety and others... Yep. Hikers are certainly
    the cream of the crop of humanity.
    Don't insult us with your wishful generalizations. You may venture out
    with that frame of mind, but do NOT place all hikers in that very small
    subset. And, by the same logic, you can not reference all off-road
    cyclists' motives based on either your opinion of the activity or the
    actions of a minority to which you may (or simply claim to) witness.

    I have just never seen any slob hikers, whereas I have seen plenty of slob
    mountain bikers.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    > written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being
    > written today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest
    > you begin with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the 19th
    > century. Anything written after 1900 is not good for you and will make
    > you even worse than you already are. I plead with you to get some
    > culture and to give up your slob mountain biking ways.

    So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at Vandeman's
    webpage.

    > PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history of
    > the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.
    >
    >
    At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word history
    of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    hand...

    Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against
    the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more
    writing and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in
    this world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all
    whereas what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.

    ..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are not
    "Edward F. Dolan".)

    It is only industrious beavers like yourself who can work their way up to
    writing anything and getting it published. I am way too lazy for any such
    endeavors. I am like God that way, it is simply enough that I am.

    Quoted message said:

    Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see
    some trees. As far as what the "not so great ed dolan (Conan the
    Librarian)" thinks about anything...
    http://www.weirdlittlebiscuit.com/images/b3ta/donkey.jpg

    Nope, I will never go to a link of yours because I do not trust you. But you
    enjoy looking at your pictures all you want. I shall continue to contemplate
    my navel as is my custom from my early childhood.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  14. Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:01:46 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 30 May 2006 14:48:43 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >
    >"Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >> On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:57:55 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>> At least it would be more entertaining than reading the
    >>>>> one-word history
    >>>>> of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    >>>>> No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it
    >>>>> first hand...
    >>>>
    >>>> Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked
    >>>> against
    >>>> the experience of many others. Those who write books have
    >>>> generally thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less
    >>>> riding and more writing
    >>>> and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters
    >>>> in this world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly
    >>>> at all whereas what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters
    >>>> enormously.
    >>>
    >>>..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you
    >>>are not
    >>>"Edward F. Dolan".)
    >>>
    >>>Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike
    >>>and see some
    >>>trees.
    >>
    >> Since when is it necessary to bring along a BIKE in order to see
    >> trees??? In fact, having to pay attention to controlling a BIKE
    >> interferes with your ability to look at trees -- if you were
    >> honest.
    >We've covered this - Your OPINION and lack of desire or ability is
    >no measure of the abilities of someone else. I can control a bike
    >and look at trees. Your lack of that ability, or desire to explore
    >that ability, is MEANINGLESS.
    >Since when is it necessary to use any type of tool to increase the
    >effectiveness of an activity?

    So you agree that it's not necessary to allow bikes off-road?
    ===


    Who said it was "necessary"...? Making something "necessary"
    (required, so to speak) is a far cry from making, or keeping, it legal
    as an option. Your insistence that it be banned simply because you do
    not choose to utilize it as a tool is not necessary, either. The
    off-road bicycle is a tool, just as a backpack or canteen is a tool. A
    loaded pack often weighs as much as a bicycle. You argue for banning
    one tool based on your OPINIONS, which have not been PROVEN to be
    anything but opinions. You scoff at other research, often conducted by
    accredited researchers, if it counters your OPINIONS than rally behind
    a battle of verbage and semantics when you get called on these
    opinions. What has been proven unnecessary are your writings,
    submissions and opinions. Road construction continues. Sprawl
    continues. Habitat destruction continues. And the ONLY thing you
    continue is to whine about bicycles... That is no longer pathetic...
    It is simply a waste.

    Did you say something?

    Yeah, he said you are wasting your time.

    Has one off-road cyclist quit riding off road due to you posting your
    opinions on this NG?? If so, please provide names, so that it can be
    verified. If not, just proff that you are wasting your time.

    Quoted message said:

    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  15. "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:01:46 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 30 May 2006 14:48:43 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >
    >"Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >> On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:57:55 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>> At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word
    >>>>> history
    >>>>> of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    >>>>> No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    >>>>> hand...
    >>>>
    >>>> Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked
    >>>> against
    >>>> the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    >>>> thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more
    >>>> writing
    >>>> and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters in
    >>>> this
    >>>> world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all
    >>>> whereas
    >>>> what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.
    >>>
    >>>..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are
    >>>not
    >>>"Edward F. Dolan".)
    >>>
    >>>Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and
    >>>see
    >>>some
    >>>trees.
    >>
    >> Since when is it necessary to bring along a BIKE in order to see
    >> trees??? In fact, having to pay attention to controlling a BIKE
    >> interferes with your ability to look at trees -- if you were honest.
    >We've covered this - Your OPINION and lack of desire or ability is no
    >measure of the abilities of someone else. I can control a bike and look
    >at
    >trees. Your lack of that ability, or desire to explore that ability, is
    >MEANINGLESS.
    >Since when is it necessary to use any type of tool to increase the
    >effectiveness of an activity?

    So you agree that it's not necessary to allow bikes off-road?
    ===


    Who said it was "necessary"...? Making something "necessary" (required, so
    to speak) is a far cry from making, or keeping, it legal as an option.
    Your
    insistence that it be banned simply because you do not choose to utilize
    it
    as a tool is not necessary, either. The off-road bicycle is a tool, just
    as
    a backpack or canteen is a tool. A loaded pack often weighs as much as a
    bicycle. You argue for banning one tool based on your OPINIONS, which have
    not been PROVEN to be anything but opinions. You scoff at other research,
    often conducted by accredited researchers, if it counters your OPINIONS
    than
    rally behind a battle of verbage and semantics when you get called on
    these
    opinions.
    What has been proven unnecessary are your writings, submissions and
    opinions. Road construction continues. Sprawl continues. Habitat
    destruction
    continues. And the ONLY thing you continue is to whine about bicycles...
    That is no longer pathetic... It is simply a waste.

    Did you say something?

    If you asked me on a Monday... I'd say "yeeeeaaaaassssssss".... If you
    asked me on a Tuesday... I'd say "yeeeeeaaaaaasssssss"...

  16. "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Hmmm... A lot of the hikers I see are loud, walking all over the trail
    and off it, leaving trash behind, carrying and drinking alcohol, being
    careless about their own safety and others... Yep. Hikers are certainly
    the cream of the crop of humanity.
    Don't insult us with your wishful generalizations. You may venture out
    with that frame of mind, but do NOT place all hikers in that very small
    subset. And, by the same logic, you can not reference all off-road
    cyclists' motives based on either your opinion of the activity or the
    actions of a minority to which you may (or simply claim to) witness.

    I have just never seen any slob hikers, whereas I have seen plenty of slob
    mountain bikers.

    Then maybe its you... Perhaps you need a mirror.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    >> written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being
    >> written today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest
    >> you begin with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the 19th
    >> century. Anything written after 1900 is not good for you and will make
    >> you even worse than you already are. I plead with you to get some
    >> culture and to give up your slob mountain biking ways.
    >
    > So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    > Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at Vandeman's
    > webpage.
    >
    >> PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history
    >> of the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.
    >>
    >>
    > At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word
    > history of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    > No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    > hand...

    Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against
    the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more
    writing and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters
    in this world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all
    whereas what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.

    ..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are
    not "Edward F. Dolan".)

    It is only industrious beavers like yourself who can work their way up to
    writing anything and getting it published. I am way too lazy for any such
    endeavors. I am like God that way, it is simply enough that I am.

    You are... a waste of space? a blot on the floor? an ego with
    constipation?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see
    some trees. As far as what the "not so great ed dolan (Conan the
    Librarian)" thinks about anything...
    http://www.weirdlittlebiscuit.com/images/b3ta/donkey.jpg

    Nope, I will never go to a link of yours because I do not trust you. But
    you enjoy looking at your pictures all you want. I shall continue to
    contemplate my navel as is my custom from my early childhood.

    ....and all this time I thought you were a construct from A-51 that got loose
    before being educated....

    Quoted message said:
  17. "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:9xFfg.15551$B42.2972@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:


    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    >
    Hmmm... A lot of the hikers I see are loud, walking all over the trail
    and off it, leaving trash behind, carrying and drinking alcohol, being
    careless about their own safety and others... Yep. Hikers are
    certainly the cream of the crop of humanity.
    Don't insult us with your wishful generalizations. You may venture out
    with that frame of mind, but do NOT place all hikers in that very small
    subset. And, by the same logic, you can not reference all off-road
    cyclists' motives based on either your opinion of the activity or the
    actions of a minority to which you may (or simply claim to) witness.

    I have just never seen any slob hikers, whereas I have seen plenty of
    slob mountain bikers.

    Then maybe its you... Perhaps you need a mirror.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    >>> Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    >>> written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being
    >>> written today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest
    >>> you begin with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the
    >>> 19th century. Anything written after 1900 is not good for you and
    >>> will make you even worse than you already are. I plead with you to
    >>> get some culture and to give up your slob mountain biking ways.
    >>
    >> So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    >> Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at Vandeman's
    >> webpage.
    >>
    >>> PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history
    >>> of the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.
    >>>
    >>>
    >> At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word
    >> history of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    >> No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    >> hand...
    >
    > Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against
    > the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    > thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more
    > writing and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters
    > in this world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all
    > whereas what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.

    ..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are
    not "Edward F. Dolan".)

    It is only industrious beavers like yourself who can work their way up to
    writing anything and getting it published. I am way too lazy for any such
    endeavors. I am like God that way, it is simply enough that I am.

    You are... a waste of space? a blot on the floor? an ego with
    constipation?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see
    some trees. As far as what the "not so great ed dolan (Conan the
    Librarian)" thinks about anything...
    http://www.weirdlittlebiscuit.com/images/b3ta/donkey.jpg

    Nope, I will never go to a link of yours because I do not trust you. But
    you enjoy looking at your pictures all you want. I shall continue to
    contemplate my navel as is my custom from my early childhood.

    ...and all this time I thought you were a construct from A-51 that got
    loose before being educated....

    Curtiss is a wonderful example of a cretin who thinks he knows something. I
    place him at the high school level, but a high schooler who has done a bit
    or reading on his own. However, that is not good enough for the kind of
    world we are living in today. He badly needs instruction by his superiors. I
    myself am far too lazy (my very best virtue) to bother with him. No, he will
    have to get on in this old world the best he can with what he's got. He will
    never go far, but maybe he can stay one or two steps ahead of all the
    Mexican peons that are pouring into the country.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  18. On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:17:34 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:9xFfg.15551$B42.2972@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:


    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    >>
    > Hmmm... A lot of the hikers I see are loud, walking all over the trail
    > and off it, leaving trash behind, carrying and drinking alcohol, being
    > careless about their own safety and others... Yep. Hikers are
    > certainly the cream of the crop of humanity.
    > Don't insult us with your wishful generalizations. You may venture out
    > with that frame of mind, but do NOT place all hikers in that very small
    > subset. And, by the same logic, you can not reference all off-road
    > cyclists' motives based on either your opinion of the activity or the
    > actions of a minority to which you may (or simply claim to) witness.

    I have just never seen any slob hikers, whereas I have seen plenty of
    slob mountain bikers.

    Then maybe its you... Perhaps you need a mirror.

    Quoted message said:


    >>>> Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    >>>> written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being
    >>>> written today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I suggest
    >>>> you begin with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end of the
    >>>> 19th century. Anything written after 1900 is not good for you and
    >>>> will make you even worse than you already are. I plead with you to
    >>>> get some culture and to give up your slob mountain biking ways.
    >>>
    >>> So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    >>> Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at Vandeman's
    >>> webpage.
    >>>
    >>>> PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history
    >>>> of the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>> At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word
    >>> history of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    >>> No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    >>> hand...
    >>
    >> Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked against
    >> the experience of many others. Those who write books have generally
    >> thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding and more
    >> writing and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about what matters
    >> in this world. I assure you that mountain biking matters hardly at all
    >> whereas what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters enormously.
    >
    > ..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are
    > not "Edward F. Dolan".)

    It is only industrious beavers like yourself who can work their way up to
    writing anything and getting it published. I am way too lazy for any such
    endeavors. I am like God that way, it is simply enough that I am.

    You are... a waste of space? a blot on the floor? an ego with
    constipation?

    Quoted message said:


    > Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see
    > some trees. As far as what the "not so great ed dolan (Conan the
    > Librarian)" thinks about anything...
    > http://www.weirdlittlebiscuit.com/images/b3ta/donkey.jpg

    Nope, I will never go to a link of yours because I do not trust you. But
    you enjoy looking at your pictures all you want. I shall continue to
    contemplate my navel as is my custom from my early childhood.

    ...and all this time I thought you were a construct from A-51 that got
    loose before being educated....

    Curtiss is a wonderful example of a cretin who thinks he knows something. I
    place him at the high school level, but a high schooler who has done a bit
    or reading on his own. However, that is not good enough for the kind of
    world we are living in today. He badly needs instruction by his superiors. I
    myself am far too lazy (my very best virtue) to bother with him. No, he will
    have to get on in this old world the best he can with what he's got. He will
    never go far, but maybe he can stay one or two steps ahead of all the
    Mexican peons that are pouring into the country.

    I doubt it. I don't think he can even make a decent burrito or fight a
    bull.

    Quoted message said:

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  19. "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:9xFfg.15551$B42.2972@dukeread05...

    Quoted message said:


    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    >>
    > Hmmm... A lot of the hikers I see are loud, walking all over the trail
    > and off it, leaving trash behind, carrying and drinking alcohol, being
    > careless about their own safety and others... Yep. Hikers are
    > certainly the cream of the crop of humanity.
    > Don't insult us with your wishful generalizations. You may venture out
    > with that frame of mind, but do NOT place all hikers in that very small
    > subset. And, by the same logic, you can not reference all off-road
    > cyclists' motives based on either your opinion of the activity or the
    > actions of a minority to which you may (or simply claim to) witness.

    I have just never seen any slob hikers, whereas I have seen plenty of
    slob mountain bikers.

    Then maybe its you... Perhaps you need a mirror.

    Quoted message said:


    >>>> Curtiss, I urge you to get to a library and read something that was
    >>>> written several hundred years ago. Most of what is presently being
    >>>> written today is not good for you and will rot your brain. I
    >>>> suggest you begin with Shakespeare and work your way up to the end
    >>>> of the 19th century. Anything written after 1900 is not good for you
    >>>> and will make you even worse than you already are. I plead with you
    >>>> to get some culture and to give up your slob mountain biking ways.
    >>>
    >>> So now the great "Conan the Librarian" is pleading....? I don't need
    >>> Shakespeare to read a tragedy - I can do that by looking at
    >>> Vandeman's webpage.
    >>>
    >>>> PS. Be sure to get to work right away writing the definitive history
    >>>> of the impact of mountain biking on the modern world.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>> At least it would be more entertaining than reading the one-word
    >>> history of the impact of Dolan on the modern world. (Dolan=Null)
    >>> No thanks - I believe I would rather ride and experience it first
    >>> hand...
    >>
    >> Personal experience is only worth so much. It has to be checked
    >> against the experience of many others. Those who write books have
    >> generally thought about a subject quite extensively. Do less riding
    >> and more writing and maybe you will get clearer in your mind about
    >> what matters in this world. I assure you that mountain biking matters
    >> hardly at all whereas what the Great Ed Dolan thinks matters
    >> enormously.
    >
    > ..and where is the published work of Ed Dolan? (I already know you are
    > not "Edward F. Dolan".)

    It is only industrious beavers like yourself who can work their way up
    to writing anything and getting it published. I am way too lazy for any
    such endeavors. I am like God that way, it is simply enough that I am.

    You are... a waste of space? a blot on the floor? an ego with
    constipation?

    Quoted message said:


    > Again... I think it is more advantageous I get out on the bike and see
    > some trees. As far as what the "not so great ed dolan (Conan the
    > Librarian)" thinks about anything...
    > http://www.weirdlittlebiscuit.com/images/b3ta/donkey.jpg

    Nope, I will never go to a link of yours because I do not trust you. But
    you enjoy looking at your pictures all you want. I shall continue to
    contemplate my navel as is my custom from my early childhood.

    ...and all this time I thought you were a construct from A-51 that got
    loose before being educated....

    Curtiss is a wonderful example of a cretin who thinks he knows something.
    I place him at the high school level, but a high schooler who has done a
    bit or reading on his own. However, that is not good enough for the kind
    of world we are living in today. He badly needs instruction by his
    superiors. I myself am far too lazy (my very best virtue) to bother with
    him. No, he will have to get on in this old world the best he can with
    what he's got. He will never go far, but maybe he can stay one or two
    steps ahead of all the Mexican peons that are pouring into the country.


    A reference to my education from Conan the Librarian..? Character
    assasination...Name calling... You have been reading from the book of
    Vandeman again. Oh well, like I said before, this country is founded on
    religious freedom.

  20. "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:17:34 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    I doubt it. I don't think he can even make a decent burrito or fight a
    bull.


    Now you are advocating I engage in the senseless killing of an animal for
    recreation...? Will you please make up your mind!?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.