I think Evans is going to be the big upset. Last year he proved to be pretty strong on the long TT, and he's having a better season in '06. Julich could be making a move as well.
Professional Cycling · Public discussion
Prediction after TT
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Professional Cycling
- Published
- 6 July 2006
- Last activity
- 11 July 2006
- Original author
- Mtventoux
- Posts
- 24
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 2,875
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Well, I was off!
Predicted
1. Landis
2. Dave Z
3. Rogers
4. Savodelli
5. Hincapie
6. Evans
7. Karpets
8. Gonchar
9. Miller
10.Moreau1. Gonchar
2. Landis
3. Rogers (Got that one!)
4. Sinkewitz (????????? Huh?)
5. Fothen (Who???????)
6. Kloden
7. Karpets (2 right)
8. Evans
9. Dave Z
10. Menchov -
Mtventoux said:
Well, I was off!
Predicted
1. Landis
2. Dave Z
3. Rogers
4. Savodelli
5. Hincapie
6. Evans
7. Karpets
8. Gonchar
9. Miller
10.Moreau1. Gonchar
2. Landis
3. Rogers (Got that one!)
4. Sinkewitz (????????? Huh?)
5. Fothen (Who???????)
6. Kloden
7. Karpets (2 right)
8. Evans
9. Dave Z
10. Menchov
Fothen was already U-23 World Champion in Time Trial. He also finished in the Top 6 or so in Time Trial in last year's Giro. Therefore I think his performance was to be expected, or at least not a big surprise. The real interesting question is how he will perform in the mountains. He is a good climber, but by no means an excellent one (yet). I think he could make Top 10 in the end, depending on his shape.The real surprise was Sinkewitz, who is known as an average Time Trialer. If he is in Time Trial that strong, I expect a lot from him in the Mountain Stages. He might very well be T-Mobile's joker.
-
El Loto said:
If you cannot prove anything then it has no worth.
If you take it like that then Lance is innocent. Isn't it?
He never used banned substances, he was enough talanted to beat armada of dopers with Jan, Basso, Beloki, Rumsas etc. Isn't it?El Loto said:
If you cannot prove anything then it has no worth. I fully believe people can change, with a pinch of skepticism perhaps, and should be allowed second chances in certain circumstances. The person he hurt the most was himself. He lost wages, sponsorship, became mentally unsound, had an alcohol problem. Like Millar said: "You have to touch the bottom to come back up". If you have no faith in born again cyclists and are so sure that riders are doped then why do you follow the sport?
Sorry, but stories like that during the most serious doping scandal in sports are just a joke.
If he is here for titles he will have to dope because it is impossible for non-doper to beat doper. Be realistic that those 7 or whatever percents achieved by doping is just too much for "clean" rider.
I can tolerate that my favorite rider has been banned but I can't tolerate that dopers return.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.