Would Shimano LX CS-HG70-9 (11-32) be a direct replacement for CS-HG70-9 (12-25) in terms
of fitting?
UK and Europe · Public discussion
Shimano CS-HG70-9 Cassette
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- UK and Europe
- Published
- 30 January 2003
- Last activity
- 30 January 2003
- Original author
- Jimbob
- Posts
- 8
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 3,783
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
JimBob said:
Would Shimano LX CS-HG70-9 (11-32) be a direct replacement for CS-HG70-9 (12-25) in terms of
fitting?Should be. The LX mech is rated 34T. Just check that the overall capacity is not exceeded (and then
forget about it because you never run big-small or small-big anyway)--
Guy
===
I wonder if you wouldn't mind piecing out our imperfections with your thoughts; and while you're
about it perhaps you could think when we talk of bicycles, that you see them printing their proud
wheels i' the receiving earth; thanks awfully.highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtmlOpen ↗ highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtmlOpen ↗
-
JimBob said:
Would Shimano LX CS-HG70-9 (11-32) be a direct replacement for CS-HG70-9 (12-25) in terms of
fitting?
Yes - did exactly that swap not that long ago (and after a ride in a howling gale yesterday, I'm
very glad I did). Just make sure your rear mech will cope with the large sprocket. I'm using an XT
rear mech, but any long-cage derailleur should work.Simon
--
Simon Ward, Accent Optical Technologies (UK) Ltd., York, YO31 8SD, UK "Perl is the ideal tool for
the inspired slacker who'd rather sing and dance than spend longer than they need to at work ..."
- perl.comhohoho.htmlOpen ↗ -
"JimBob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
Would Shimano LX CS-HG70-9 (11-32) be a direct replacement for CS-HG70-9 (12-25) in terms of
fitting?I was looking into cassette hubs recently. If your hub body is of a recent type, called Hyperglide
C, then you can replace the cassette directly. If it isn't, you need to put a thin spacer on the hub
to allow the 11 tooth sprocket to clear the end of the splines.sheldonbrown.comk7.htmlOpen ↗ explains the different types of hub bodies.
Other people have mentioned your derailleur. I didn't see you mention what type you have, but the
cage length doesn't determine the largest sprocket you can use. Mountain bike derailleurs have more
slope in the parallelogram than road bike derailleurs, allowing the cage to clear a larger sprocket.
The length of the cage determines the amount of chain slack the derailleur can take up. You will
probably need to use a mountain bike derailleur with a 32 tooth sprocket, and you must make sure
your chain is long enough.Colin
-
"JimBob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Would Shimano LX CS-HG70-9 (11-32) be a direct replacement for CS-HG70-9 (12-25) in terms of
fitting?Sorry forgot to mention - I am using 105 throughout. The rear derailleur is 5500 GS (for a triple)
with capacity of 37T.The largest sprocket quoted is 27T - is this non-negotiable?
Cheers
-
Colin said:
I was looking into cassette hubs recently. If your hub body is of a recent type, called Hyperglide
C, then you can replace the cassette directly. If it isn't, you need to put a thin spacer on the
hub to allow the 11 tooth sprocket to clear the end of the splines.I thnk my 11-32 cassette came with the spacer included, but ICBW. I'll check when I get a minute.
--
Guy
===
I wonder if you wouldn't mind piecing out our imperfections with your thoughts; and while you're
about it perhaps you could think when we talk of bicycles, that you see them printing their proud
wheels i' the receiving earth; thanks awfully.highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtmlOpen ↗ highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtmlOpen ↗
-
JimBob said:
Sorry forgot to mention - I am using 105 throughout. The rear derailleur is 5500 GS (for a triple)
with capacity of 37T.The largest sprocket quoted is 27T - is this non-negotiable?
You may get a little more by screwing in the b-screw lots. It depends a bit on your dropout layout
and the phase of the moon.--
Andy MorrisAndyAtJinkasDotFreeserve.Co.UK
Love this: Put an end to Outlook Express's messy quotes
home.in.tum.deoe quotefixOpen ↗ -
"JimBob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
Sorry forgot to mention - I am using 105 throughout. The rear derailleur is 5500 GS (for a triple)
with capacity of 37T.The largest sprocket quoted is 27T - is this non-negotiable?
I think 32 might be too much. However if you have 105 cranks I think it's unlikely you'll need an 11
tooth sprocket. Maybe you could use a 12-27 cassette and replace the smallest chainring with a 26,
which gives you nearly the same low gear?Colin
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.