[email hidden] (Globaldisc) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:OK Anders.....just curious on how you will handle this. Doug pointed out it takes 8 weeks for full
recovery due to muscle damage from running a marathon.
It was Steve who said it, actually - and I don´t have any argument with it. It´s just that this
doesn´t mean that one cannot commence anything called "training" before the eight weeks are over or,
if one does, the net effect cannot be positive.
Quoted message said:You've said the original poster "only" requested a "wish" to run a second marathon 10 weeks after
his first
Yes, I´m pretty sure he didn´t mention anything about doing a third marathon ten weeks after the
second and so on ad absurdum:-)
He didn´t express a particular wish to improve his time, either.
Quoted message said:and have also said they have plenty of time to recover, train, and taper over > that 10 weeks span
of time. Again, you asserted this ignorant to knowledge > of the person's age, condition, etc.
"Quite a bit" of time, actually.
Something like 4/10 weeks for the recovery ("no hard running"😉, 3/10 for the "active" training and
3/10 for the taper (which wouldn´t be bereft of any "training" whatsoever).
But again, I have a wholly different idea about who is the assertive and the ignorant one in
this thread:-)
Quoted message said:Care to do the math and layout the schedule (which would be the answer to the person's
question). ?
In any case not before the poster re-appears:-)
But, in principle, should I still feel confident about his chances after learning more about him and
his prior training, the schedule I´d suggest wouldn´t have to be radically different from the last
six weeks of the program he´d done for the first marathon.
Quoted message said:So the guy heals/recovers over 8 weeks, has an opportunity to train for a week/7 days to build up
mileage/capacity...then enter his taper the final week before his second marathon? LOL.
Anything to see you smile, Andrew:-) But aren´t you being a bit, what´s the word, disingenuous here?
Quoted message said:Anders,...the issue is not the person's determination,
I haven´t give a hoot about anyone´s determination here, and I wouldn´t advise anyone to run any
kind of marathon in any manner if I thought that completing it would seem to require determination
in excess of what is "normal".
Quoted message said:it's their physiology...and it's on that basis that the person's "wish" is ill-advised. It does
not matter how old or experienced the runner is....
This is the first point on which it had become annoyingly obvious that we couldn´t even seem to
manage to disagree; the other is what kind of runners the group of 4:30 first- time marathoners can
(or cannot) be expected to contain and the third on what is (or is not) "a universal point of
agreement, 99% of the coaches/trainers".
Quoted message said:I don't expect you to reply and lay out a feasible training schedule just as I don't expect you to
go over Niagara Falls and survive.....oops!....someone in fact did do that....so maybe there's a
chance you too will educate us all on the 10 week training program between a 1st and 2nd Marathon.
(but I'm not counting on it).
Normally, I´d expect a polite (I think) declaration of no further interest to to pursue a dead-end
discussion to be so accepted - but in this particular case, I´m willing to attribute your insistence
to the very special nervous and mental state most first-time (and not only first-time) marathoners
find themselves in the last few days:-)
Anders