in message <[email hidden]>,
(' ') said:Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
win ahead of the sprinters?
Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?
So let's get this straight. He's a specialist on prologues, and he's a
specialist on classics, and he's a specialist on cobbles. What is this
paragon not a specialist on?
Quoted message said:And, couldn't it be said that other folks (Boonen, Hincapie, et al)
are equally talented on cobbles and either have strong sprint support
or also really want a stage win?
Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
Cancellara wins on "home turf"
He wasn't on home turf, or even near it.
Boonen is a sprinter who was quite near home turf and familiar with
cobbles. And it popular, charismatic and photogenic.
Quoted message said:and provides an uplifting story to
detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."
Nothing odd about it. The only thing odd is that people keep looking at
Cancellara and saying 'oh, but he's just a specialist at <insert whatever
the peloton is doing today>'. Cancellara isn't a specialist. He isn't
necessarily the best all round cyclist in the peloton, either - his
weakness may show in the mountains. But he is one of the best all round
cyclists in the peloton. What we say yesterday is that, as a strong man
which excellent bike handling skills, he's capable of being an opportunist
on an uphill finish on cobbles.
We've also seen, over the past three days, that the big sprint teams aren't
very flexible and are vulnerable to opportunists.
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
Q: Whats a webmaster?
A: Like a spider, but nowhere near as intelligent.