Road Cycling · Public discussion

Cancellara's sprint win...a little too convenient and easy?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 63 posts · 1,608 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
11 July 2007
Last activity
16 July 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
63
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,608
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 63
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
    that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?
    And, couldn't it be said that other folks (Boonen, Hincapie, et al)
    are equally talented on cobbles and either have strong sprint support
    or also really want a stage win?

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf" and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
    changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
    watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."

    - Corey

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message >

    Quoted message said:

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf" and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
    changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
    watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."

    - Corey

    Are suggesting that the group of pro cyclist that can't even get together
    and agree to save their on asses from the UCI and WADA would agree to
    something like letting Cancellara win? I don't see it. But then I don't
    buy into any other conspiracy theories either.

    Fred

  3. Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
    that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?
    And, couldn't it be said that other folks (Boonen, Hincapie, et al)
    are equally talented on cobbles and either have strong sprint support
    or also really want a stage win?

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf" and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
    changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
    watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."

    You should never think out, lout. 😉
    Cancellara wasn't on his home turf.
    Photogenic...? "Cancellara looks smashing in yellow. Let's let him
    have it today!" Ummm...no.
    It wasn't expected as it was highly unusual, so that does make it a
    little odd.
    Cancellara has a huge engine and, it seems, excellent timing.

    A lot of things could have happened. Only one thing did.
    Cancellara executed a beautiful smack down.

    R

  4. Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
    that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?
    And, couldn't it be said that other folks (Boonen, Hincapie, et al)
    are equally talented on cobbles and either have strong sprint support
    or also really want a stage win?

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf" and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
    changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
    watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."

    - Corey

    In my opinion, what looked "easy" was actually a subtle point made by
    Cancellara, that is, by sprinting up to the remains of the breakaway,
    he confused the sprinters teams who found it much harder to compute
    Cancellara's speed when he was in the midst of these other riders, and
    to adjust their speed accordingly. If the break hadn't been there,
    then his move would have had much less chance of working.

    Such moves work very rarely, Ekimov won this way in 1991 and failed in
    dozens of subsequent attempts. Cancellara was not previously marked
    for such attacks, I believe, but it will now be even harder for him to
    win this way. He has had some good field sprint results, he finished
    2nd in one in this year's Tour of Switzerland.

    -ilan

  5. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
    that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?
    And, couldn't it be said that other folks (Boonen, Hincapie, et al)
    are equally talented on cobbles and either have strong sprint support
    or also really want a stage win?

    Quoted message said:

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf" and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
    changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
    watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."

    Quoted message said:

    - Corey

    In my opinion, what looked "easy" was actually a subtle point made by
    Cancellara, that is, by sprinting up to the remains of the breakaway,
    he confused the sprinters teams who found it much harder to compute
    Cancellara's speed when he was in the midst of these other riders, and
    to adjust their speed accordingly. If the break hadn't been there,
    then his move would have had much less chance of working.

    Such moves work very rarely, Ekimov won this way in 1991 and failed in
    dozens of subsequent attempts. Cancellara was not previously marked
    for such attacks, I believe, but it will now be even harder for him to
    win this way. He has had some good field sprint results, he finished
    2nd in one in this year's Tour of Switzerland.

    Dumbass -

    There was some kilo specialist in 89(?) that attacked 800m from the
    finish in 2 stages in the TdF and it worked for him both times. I
    don't have the encyclopaedic memory like Benjo so . . .

    As for Ekimov - I think he lacked the pure speed for that move to work
    in his later years. He probably kept trying it because what else is he
    going to do?

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  6. Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Dear Newbie -

    Please go away.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  7. in message <[email hidden]>,

    (' ') said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
    that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?

    So let's get this straight. He's a specialist on prologues, and he's a
    specialist on classics, and he's a specialist on cobbles. What is this
    paragon not a specialist on?

    Quoted message said:

    And, couldn't it be said that other folks (Boonen, Hincapie, et al)
    are equally talented on cobbles and either have strong sprint support
    or also really want a stage win?

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf"

    He wasn't on home turf, or even near it.

    Boonen is a sprinter who was quite near home turf and familiar with
    cobbles. And it popular, charismatic and photogenic.

    Quoted message said:

    and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
    changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
    watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."

    Nothing odd about it. The only thing odd is that people keep looking at
    Cancellara and saying 'oh, but he's just a specialist at <insert whatever
    the peloton is doing today>'. Cancellara isn't a specialist. He isn't
    necessarily the best all round cyclist in the peloton, either - his
    weakness may show in the mountains. But he is one of the best all round
    cyclists in the peloton. What we say yesterday is that, as a strong man
    which excellent bike handling skills, he's capable of being an opportunist
    on an uphill finish on cobbles.

    We've also seen, over the past three days, that the big sprint teams aren't
    very flexible and are vulnerable to opportunists.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    Q: Whats a webmaster?
    A: Like a spider, but nowhere near as intelligent.

  8. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    first this is the beginning of TdF, second he's not a thread for GC,
    thus he's not the most marked man.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
    that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?

    he seized the moment, sometimes it's all they need win.

  9. "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
    that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?
    And, couldn't it be said that other folks (Boonen, Hincapie, et al)
    are equally talented on cobbles and either have strong sprint support
    or also really want a stage win?

    Quoted message said:

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf" and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
    changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
    watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."

    Quoted message said:

    - Corey

    In my opinion, what looked "easy" was actually a subtle point made by
    Cancellara, that is, by sprinting up to the remains of the breakaway,
    he confused the sprinters teams who found it much harder to compute
    Cancellara's speed when he was in the midst of these other riders, and
    to adjust their speed accordingly. If the break hadn't been there,
    then his move would have had much less chance of working.

    Such moves work very rarely, Ekimov won this way in 1991 and failed in
    dozens of subsequent attempts. Cancellara was not previously marked
    for such attacks, I believe, but it will now be even harder for him to
    win this way. He has had some good field sprint results, he finished
    2nd in one in this year's Tour of Switzerland.

    Dumbass -

    There was some kilo specialist in 89(?) that attacked 800m from the
    finish in 2 stages in the TdF and it worked for him both times. I
    don't have the encyclopaedic memory like Benjo so . . .

    It was my fellow-countryman Jelle Nijdam. I didn't need a memory for that:
    the Dutch commentator on TV screamed: "But he is doing a Jelle Nijdam!"

    Benjo

  10. Kurgan Gringioni said:
    Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Dear Newbie -

    Please go away.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

    C'mon with Lance gone all we've got left is the racing, pretty much. A
    few came back for Flandis last year. This year it's a slim crop at
    best. Luckily we've had good stages so far.
    Have to wonder how McEwan is doing physically and how the hell Boonen
    managed to miss todays sprint so badly?
    Bill C

  11. Quoted message said:


    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf" and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment?

    No.

    --
    JT
    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  12. Kurgan Gringioni said:


    There was some kilo specialist in 89(?) that attacked 800m from the
    finish in 2 stages in the TdF and it worked for him both times. I
    don't have the encyclopaedic memory like Benjo so . . .

    Nijdam?

    --
    JT
    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  13. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
    that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?
    And, couldn't it be said that other folks (Boonen, Hincapie, et al)
    are equally talented on cobbles and either have strong sprint support
    or also really want a stage win?

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf" and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
    changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
    watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."

    - Corey

    Are you kidding? Four guys can't even get together
    and go for a stage win.

    S.

  14. Kurgan Gringioni said:
    Quoted message said:

    On Jul 11, 5:56 pm, [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yes, he's a specialist of the cobbles, but where there so many cobbles
    that they would be a deciding factor in the sprint?
    And, couldn't it be said that other folks (Boonen, Hincapie, et al)
    are equally talented on cobbles and either have strong sprint support
    or also really want a stage win?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf" and provides an uplifting story to
    detract from all the negative press of the moment? Could money have
    changed hands? I know nothing and am just thinking out lout, but as I
    watched it yesterday I just though "huh...that's a little odd..."

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    - Corey

    Quoted message said:

    In my opinion, what looked "easy" was actually a subtle point made by
    Cancellara, that is, by sprinting up to the remains of the breakaway,
    he confused the sprinters teams who found it much harder to compute
    Cancellara's speed when he was in the midst of these other riders, and
    to adjust their speed accordingly. If the break hadn't been there,
    then his move would have had much less chance of working.

    Quoted message said:

    Such moves work very rarely, Ekimov won this way in 1991 and failed in
    dozens of subsequent attempts. Cancellara was not previously marked
    for such attacks, I believe, but it will now be even harder for him to
    win this way. He has had some good field sprint results, he finished
    2nd in one in this year's Tour of Switzerland.

    Dumbass -

    There was some kilo specialist in 89(?) that attacked 800m from the
    finish in 2 stages in the TdF and it worked for him both times. I
    don't have the encyclopaedic memory like Benjo so . . .

    As for Ekimov - I think he lacked the pure speed for that move to work
    in his later years. He probably kept trying it because what else is he
    going to do?

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

    Well, just because it worked twice in one year doesn't mean it works
    often. Another person who tried numerous times with at least one
    success was Jesper Skibby.

    -ilan

  15. Quoted message said:

    Well, just because it worked twice in one year doesn't mean it works
    often. Another person who tried numerous times with at least one
    success was Jesper Skibby.

    Bertogliati, stage 1 2002, perhaps. On Zabel's birthday, it seems.

    Quoted message said:

    -ilan

    MJ;

    --
    ..signature necesse est

  16. in message <Ao8li.106254$1i1.82707@pd7urf3no>, mimoso ([email hidden]'😉

    Quoted message said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Was there anyone else who thought it was strangely straightforward and
    too "good a story" that the most marked man in the pack soloed to a
    win ahead of the sprinters?

    first this is the beginning of TdF, second he's not a threat for GC,

    No?

    I agree he's not yet a very serious threat. But I also think he's
    under-rated. He stands a good chance of being stage winner on Stage 13 and
    Stage 20, since they're both CLMs and he is one of the best
    time-triallists in the peloton. However, you typically only gain seconds
    on CLM stages, and I expect he will lose minutes on some of the mountain
    stages, so I don't expect him to win this year. However, it depends to
    some extent on how much support the team give him - unlikely to be much,
    because Schleck and Sastre should be much better in the mountains. But if
    Sastre has a crash and CSC concentrate on getting Cancellara through the
    mountains...

    I don't expect he'll win this year, although if I could get a bet at the
    odds he was on last week, it would be worth a punt. But he'll be a serious
    GC contender within three years.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Conservatives are not necessarily stupid,
    ;; but most stupid people are conservatives -- J S Mill

  17. in message <[email hidden]>, Bill C

    (') said:

    Have to wonder how McEwan is doing physically and how the hell Boonen
    managed to miss todays sprint so badly?

    I told you: God loves him. God so loves Tom Boonen that He smote Mark
    Cavendish and Robbie McEwan on Sunday with the Holy Pump in the Spokes.
    God so loves Tom Boonen that He smote all the other sprinters on Monday
    with the Wayward Pedal of Zabel. God so loves Tom Boonen that he
    miraculously turned the finish straight on Tuesday to cobbles.

    With God on your side, how /can/ you lose?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    The Conservative Party is now dead. The corpse may still be
    twitching, but resurrection is not an option - unless Satan
    chucks them out of Hell as too objectionable even for him.

  18. corey said:

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf"

    Why hasn't CNN reported the invasion of France by Switzerland ?

  19. Donald Munro said:
    corey said:

    Could there have been an peloton agreement that photogenic, popular
    Cancellara wins on "home turf"

    Why hasn't CNN reported the invasion of France by Switzerland ?

    Ummm, I think they call it the EU. There are no borders. They are
    all brothers. Your turf is my turf. Everybody hold hands now.
    Kumbaya, Kumbaya!

    Everybody now!

    R

  20. "Mikko J Virtanen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Well, just because it worked twice in one year doesn't mean it works
    often. Another person who tried numerous times with at least one
    success was Jesper Skibby.

    Bertogliati, stage 1 2002, perhaps. On Zabel's birthday, it seems.

    One of the greatest specialists of making a breakaway in the last kilometer
    was [censored] Teirlinck. That was the way he won 5 TdF stages: three in 1972,
    one in 1973 and 1976.

    Benjo

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.