Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Anyone see this last night?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 16 posts · 911 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
18 October 2007
Last activity
19 October 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
911
Views / 30 days
9

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s2055118.htm

    Pretty horrid I thought. I doubt we'll be seeing it in bike shops any
    time soon. Wonder what they'd make of it in the linear drive bikes
    thread in rec.bicycles.tech...

  2. Quoted message said:

    http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s2055118.htm

    Quoted message said:

    Pretty horrid I thought. I doubt we'll be seeing it in bike shops any
    time soon. Wonder what they'd make of it in the linear drive bikes
    thread in rec.bicycles.tech...

    I liked the bit when asked if it's easier than a normal bike (seeing it has
    no seat), the inventor said it was slightly easier because you're standing up.

    I don't know what planet he's from, but here on earth, when you've got your
    [censored] parked on a slab of rubber, there is no way standing is easier.
    --
    Linux Registered User # 302622
    <http://counter.li.org>

  3. John Tserkezis said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s2055118.htm
    Pretty horrid I thought. I doubt we'll be seeing it in bike shops any
    time soon. Wonder what they'd make of it in the linear drive bikes
    thread in rec.bicycles.tech...

    I liked the bit when asked if it's easier than a normal bike (seeing it has
    no seat), the inventor said it was slightly easier because you're standing up.

    I don't know what planet he's from, but here on earth, when you've got your
    [censored] parked on a slab of rubber, there is no way standing is easier.
    --
    Linux Registered User # 302622
    <http://counter.li.org>

    Like to see him do ATBIAD on one

    phillip brown

  4. phillip brown said:

    Like to see him do ATBIAD on one

    That said, did he think wind resistance was an urban legend or something?

    My first (and, ahem, last) bay ride was only half way, through the pelting
    rain, wind, hypothermia and a couple of flats, I was somewhat displeased.

    Bugger if I had to do that standing up as well...
    --
    Linux Registered User # 302622
    <http://counter.li.org>

  5. "John Tserkezis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s2055118.htm

    Quoted message said:

    Pretty horrid I thought. I doubt we'll be seeing it in bike shops any
    time soon. Wonder what they'd make of it in the linear drive bikes
    thread in rec.bicycles.tech...

    I liked the bit when asked if it's easier than a normal bike (seeing it
    has no seat), the inventor said it was slightly easier because you're
    standing up.

    I don't know what planet he's from, but here on earth, when you've got
    your [censored] parked on a slab of rubber, there is no way standing is easier.
    --
    Linux Registered User # 302622
    <http://counter.li.org>

    I would have thought that one of the reasons why bike are as efficient as
    they are is because you don't have to support your own weight. I doubt
    linear motion is a great deal better than conventional pedalling movement
    and having ridden a bike with no saddle when my Brooks got stolen (grrr) I
    can catagorically state that it is a Not Good ThingT in many ways, most of
    which are best described with unbecoming language.

  6. Don't they pre-screen out the [censored] on this show?

  7. Donga said:

    Don't they pre-screen out the [censored] on this show?

    be a pretty boring show if they did that, you need the [censored] to make it worth watching.

  8. "Resound" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "John Tserkezis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s2055118.htm

    Quoted message said:

    Pretty horrid I thought. I doubt we'll be seeing it in bike shops any
    time soon. Wonder what they'd make of it in the linear drive bikes
    thread in rec.bicycles.tech...

    I liked the bit when asked if it's easier than a normal bike (seeing it
    has no seat), the inventor said it was slightly easier because you're
    standing up.

    I don't know what planet he's from, but here on earth, when you've got
    your [censored] parked on a slab of rubber, there is no way standing is easier.
    --
    Linux Registered User # 302622
    <http://counter.li.org>

    I would have thought that one of the reasons why bike are as efficient as
    they are is because you don't have to support your own weight. I doubt
    linear motion is a great deal better than conventional pedalling movement
    and having ridden a bike with no saddle when my Brooks got stolen (grrr) I
    can catagorically state that it is a Not Good ThingT in many ways, most of
    which are best described with unbecoming language.

    Although I thought the bike was horrid, the guy did say that he couldn't go
    close to matching the efficiency of a normal bike which he quoted as being
    about 98%. The inventor was claiming that the bike was better from a
    biomedical point of view and would reduce the amount of problems that people
    have with sore backs from bending over on a normal bike.

    Personally I reckon that having one would be good for a laugh and maybe a
    cruisy sort of a ride down to the shops or through the city - it would make
    seeing over traffic pretty easy as well but I still don't think I will be
    lining up for one!!! Maybe if he teamed up with that guy with the
    ridiculously huge plantetary cranks from a few months ago they could come up
    with the ultimate Frankenbike - linear pedals around a giant planetary crank
    so it simulates climbing up a giant staircase......now there is something I
    would buy!!!!

    Gags

  9. In aus.bicycle on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:29:49 +1000

    Gags said:

    about 98%. The inventor was claiming that the bike was better from a
    biomedical point of view and would reduce the amount of problems that people
    have with sore backs from bending over on a normal bike.

    This is a problem that has already been solved...

    Zebee

  10. Gags said:

    Maybe if he teamed up with that guy with the
    ridiculously huge plantetary cranks from a few months ago they could come up
    with the ultimate Frankenbike - linear pedals around a giant planetary crank
    so it simulates climbing up a giant staircase......now there is something I
    would buy!!!!

    Add the duo to that other bloke who appeared on the show about two years ago who claimed to of invented recumbent bicycles.

  11. cfsmtb said:

    Add the duo to that other bloke who appeared on the show about two
    years ago who claimed to of invented recumbent bicycles.

    This show is riddled with examples of re-inventions. They really don't do
    enough in the way of background checks.

    --
    Linux Registered User # 302622
    <http://counter.li.org>

  12. Zebee Johnstone said:

    In aus.bicycle on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:29:49 +1000

    Gags said:

    about 98%. The inventor was claiming that the bike was better from a
    biomedical point of view and would reduce the amount of problems that people
    have with sore backs from bending over on a normal bike.

    This is a problem that has already been solved...

    Zebee

    Norge! Oh sorry, wrong group. Similar theme though ;-)

  13. In aus.bicycle on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:35:11 -0000

    Quoted message said:
    Zebee Johnstone said:

    In aus.bicycle on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:29:49 +1000

    Gags said:

    about 98%. The inventor was claiming that the bike was better from a
    biomedical point of view and would reduce the amount of problems that people
    have with sore backs from bending over on a normal bike.

    This is a problem that has already been solved...

    Zebee

    Norge! Oh sorry, wrong group. Similar theme though ;-)

    Absolutely. This secret mind control business is work you know.

    Zebee
    - fulfilling the quota

  14. John Tserkezis said:
    cfsmtb said:

    Add the duo to that other bloke who appeared on the show about two
    years ago who claimed to of invented recumbent bicycles.

    This show is riddled with examples of re-inventions. They really don't do
    enough in the way of background checks.

    --
    Linux Registered User # 302622
    <http://counter.li.org>

    I think it's time for the Chaser to go after The New Inventors. Maybe
    a song? Maybe a few whacky new ideas?

  15. Donga said:

    I think it's time for the Chaser to go after The New Inventors. Maybe
    a song? Maybe a few whacky new ideas?

    About a month or so ago, The Chaser nicked NI's closing credits to end one episode, so it's a given something else could transpire. They've already done the First Tuesday Book Club ... (warning: NSFW)

  16. "Gags" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Resound" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "John Tserkezis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    > http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s2055118.htm

    > Pretty horrid I thought. I doubt we'll be seeing it in bike shops any
    > time soon. Wonder what they'd make of it in the linear drive bikes
    > thread in rec.bicycles.tech...

    I liked the bit when asked if it's easier than a normal bike (seeing it
    has no seat), the inventor said it was slightly easier because you're
    standing up.

    I don't know what planet he's from, but here on earth, when you've got
    your [censored] parked on a slab of rubber, there is no way standing is
    easier.
    --
    Linux Registered User # 302622
    <http://counter.li.org>

    I would have thought that one of the reasons why bike are as efficient as
    they are is because you don't have to support your own weight. I doubt
    linear motion is a great deal better than conventional pedalling movement
    and having ridden a bike with no saddle when my Brooks got stolen (grrr)
    I can catagorically state that it is a Not Good ThingT in many ways, most
    of which are best described with unbecoming language.

    Although I thought the bike was horrid, the guy did say that he couldn't
    go close to matching the efficiency of a normal bike which he quoted as
    being about 98%. The inventor was claiming that the bike was better from
    a biomedical point of view and would reduce the amount of problems that
    people have with sore backs from bending over on a normal bike.

    Personally I reckon that having one would be good for a laugh and maybe a
    cruisy sort of a ride down to the shops or through the city - it would
    make seeing over traffic pretty easy as well but I still don't think I
    will be lining up for one!!! Maybe if he teamed up with that guy with the
    ridiculously huge plantetary cranks from a few months ago they could come
    up with the ultimate Frankenbike - linear pedals around a giant planetary
    crank so it simulates climbing up a giant staircase......now there is
    something I would buy!!!!


    To do it properly though, you'd have to set it up so you were standing
    sideways while you did it.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.