Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

More about the history of ARBR

Started by Risto Varanka · · Last activity · 7 posts · 826 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
12 December 2003
Last activity
14 December 2003
Original author
Risto Varanka
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
826
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Found this thread:

    groups.google.comgroups
    io.com&rnum=5&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Drecumbent%2Bgroup:rec.bicycles.racing%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-
    8%26group%3Drec.bicycles.racing%26selm%3Dcycleam-2403971316050001%2540kelp248.cruzio.com%26rnum%3D5

    Seems there has been enough bent discussion at RBR. A more recent example:

    groups.google.comgroups
    apyh6.84774%24B6.20811753%40news1.rdc1.md.home.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO-
    8859-1%26q%3Drecumbent%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Drec.bicycles.racing

    --
    Risto Varanka | helsinki.fi~rvaranka [email hidden]

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Found this thread:

    groups.google.comgroups
    .com&rnum=5&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Drecumbent%2Bgroup:rec.bicycles.racing%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-
    8%26group%3Drec.bicycles.racing%26selm%3Dcycleam-
    2403971316050001%2540kelp248.cruzio.com%26rnum%3D5

    Seems there has been enough bent discussion at RBR. A more recent example:

    groups.google.comgroups
    yh6.84774%24B6.20811753%40news1.rdc1.md.home.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO-
    8859-1%26q%3Drecumbent%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Drec.bicycles.racing

    As can deduced from example number 2, Martin Kreig was(is?) an inveterate cross-poster that stirred
    up lots of flame wars. In spite of his efforts to 'found' this NG, his cross-posting habits acquired
    for him a permanent position in my Bozo-Bin.
    --

    Cletus D. Lee Bacchetta Giro Lightning Voyager clee.orgclee.org
    - Bellaire, TX USA -

  3. Original proposal:
    groups.google.comgroups

    Original control message for the creation of the group (23 Apr 1997):
    ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/control/alt/alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent.gz

    First non-spam message posted to arbr: groups.google.comgroups
    02.dialip.mich.com

    Joao "slow day at work" de Souza

  4. We don't limit infestations to just the racing group. Sometimes the
    rec.bicycles.misc group is graced with our presence:

    groups.google.comgroups
    8&threadm=3C213DC7.344D26FB%40cc.ysu.edu&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Ddynamic%2Bcycling%26ie%3DISO-
    8859-1%26hl%3Den%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch

    We seem to be universally loved by our cycling brethren.

    Cheers, Derek

  5. Cletus Lee <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>... [...]

    Quoted message said:

    As can deduced from example number 2, Martin Kreig was(is?) an inveterate cross-poster that
    stirred up lots of flame wars. In spite of his efforts to 'found' this NG, his cross-posting
    habits acquired for him a permanent position in my Bozo-Bin.

    I do agree that cross-posting is the pits. The problem with it is that you have to broaden your
    focus to take in another mostly alien group but you are bound to be misunderstood and so the flaming
    begins without anyone even being on the same page. It is better to have our little flame wars among
    ourselves where there is at least a common understood interest. Cross-posting is always a mess and
    there is thankfully very little of it here on ARBR of late.

    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  6. Quoted message said:

    ... Seems there has been enough bent discussion at RBR. A more recent example:

    groups.google.comgroups
    yh6.84774%24B6.20811753%40news1.rdc1.md.home.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO-
    8859-1%26q%3Drecumbent%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Drec.bicycles.racing

    I thought that discussion was rather interesting and was disappointed when it ended. 😉

    Tom Sherman - Planet Earth

  7. Obviously the original intent was to add the NG to rec:

    groups.google.comgroups
    100.cruzio.com&rnum=2&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO-8859-
    1%26q%3DRFD%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Dalt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    Probably it failed flat on its face because once this group was in place, not many people
    really cared.

    About adding groups, found this post too by Joao de Souza:

    groups.google.comgroups
    8&threadm=3F883155.1020908%40TRASHsonic.net&rnum=5&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO-8859-
    1%26q%3DRFD%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Dalt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    Could also have a look at the relevant RFCs and what other sites have on the issue, when I find
    the time...

    --
    Risto Varanka | helsinki.fi~rvaranka [email hidden]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.