Home Recumbent bicycles More about the history of ARBR
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
Original section Recumbent bicycles
Published 12 December 2003
Last activity 14 December 2003
Original author Risto Varanka
Posts 7
Discussion status Public discussion
Total views 826
Views / 30 days 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–7 of 7 Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Original post Risto Varanka
Archived post
12 December 2003, 03:47 UTC
#1
Found this thread:
groups.google.com groups Open ↗ io.com&rnum=5&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Drecumbent%2Bgroup:rec.bicycles.racing%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF- 8%26group%3Drec.bicycles.racing%26selm%3Dcycleam-2403971316050001%2540kelp248.cruzio.com%26rnum%3D5
Seems there has been enough bent discussion at RBR. A more recent example:
groups.google.com groups Open ↗ apyh6.84774%24B6.20811753%40news1.rdc1.md.home.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO- 8859-1%26q%3Drecumbent%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Drec.bicycles.racing
-- Risto Varanka | helsinki.fi ~rvaranka Open ↗ [email hidden]
12 December 2003, 03:48 UTC
#2
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said: Found this thread:
groups.google.com groups Open ↗ .com&rnum=5&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Drecumbent%2Bgroup:rec.bicycles.racing%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF- 8%26group%3Drec.bicycles.racing%26selm%3Dcycleam- 2403971316050001%2540kelp248.cruzio.com%26rnum%3D5
Seems there has been enough bent discussion at RBR. A more recent example:
groups.google.com groups Open ↗ yh6.84774%24B6.20811753%40news1.rdc1.md.home.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO- 8859-1%26q%3Drecumbent%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Drec.bicycles.racing
As can deduced from example number 2, Martin Kreig was(is?) an inveterate cross-poster that stirred up lots of flame wars. In spite of his efforts to 'found' this NG, his cross-posting habits acquired for him a permanent position in my Bozo-Bin. --
Cletus D. Lee Bacchetta Giro Lightning Voyager clee.org clee.org Open ↗ - Bellaire, TX USA -
Joao de Souza
Archived post
12 December 2003, 03:48 UTC
#3
Original proposal: groups.google.com groups Open ↗
Original control message for the creation of the group (23 Apr 1997): ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/control/alt/alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent.gz
First non-spam message posted to arbr: groups.google.com groups Open ↗ 02.dialip.mich.com
Joao "slow day at work" de Souza
12 December 2003, 03:48 UTC
#4
We don't limit infestations to just the racing group. Sometimes the rec.bicycles.misc group is graced with our presence:
groups.google.com groups Open ↗ 8&threadm=3C213DC7.344D26FB%40cc.ysu.edu&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Ddynamic%2Bcycling%26ie%3DISO- 8859-1%26hl%3Den%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch
We seem to be universally loved by our cycling brethren.
Cheers, Derek
Edward Dolan
Archived post
12 December 2003, 06:07 UTC
#5
Cletus Lee <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>... [...]
Quoted message said: As can deduced from example number 2, Martin Kreig was(is?) an inveterate cross-poster that stirred up lots of flame wars. In spite of his efforts to 'found' this NG, his cross-posting habits acquired for him a permanent position in my Bozo-Bin.
I do agree that cross-posting is the pits. The problem with it is that you have to broaden your focus to take in another mostly alien group but you are bound to be misunderstood and so the flaming begins without anyone even being on the same page. It is better to have our little flame wars among ourselves where there is at least a common understood interest. Cross-posting is always a mess and there is thankfully very little of it here on ARBR of late.
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
13 December 2003, 05:16 UTC
#6
Quoted message said: ... Seems there has been enough bent discussion at RBR. A more recent example:
groups.google.com groups Open ↗ yh6.84774%24B6.20811753%40news1.rdc1.md.home.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO- 8859-1%26q%3Drecumbent%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Drec.bicycles.racing
I thought that discussion was rather interesting and was disappointed when it ended. 😉
Tom Sherman - Planet Earth
Risto Varanka
Archived post
14 December 2003, 07:04 UTC
#7
Obviously the original intent was to add the NG to rec:
groups.google.com groups Open ↗ 100.cruzio.com&rnum=2&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO-8859- 1%26q%3DRFD%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Dalt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
Probably it failed flat on its face because once this group was in place, not many people really cared.
About adding groups, found this post too by Joao de Souza:
groups.google.com groups Open ↗ 8&threadm=3F883155.1020908%40TRASHsonic.net&rnum=5&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO-8859- 1%26q%3DRFD%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Dalt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
Could also have a look at the relevant RFCs and what other sites have on the issue, when I find the time...
-- Risto Varanka | helsinki.fi ~rvaranka Open ↗ [email hidden]
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
· 0 bots
· 0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.