WASHINGTON (AP) -- Farm-raised salmon contain significantly more dioxins and other potentially cancer- causing pollutants than do salmon caught in the wild, says a major study that tested contaminants in fish bought around the world.
Not only more dioxins but they are fed pellets made up of rendered bodies of cats and dogs and road kill. This mix is sold to farmers who raise the salmon on the east coast and to the chinese and thailand farmers of shellfish such as shrimp. All the non-wild fish and shell fish are fed this mix. Well now you get to enjoy fido and fluffy twice. Matt
Peter Aitken said:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Farm-raised salmon contain significantly more dioxins and other potentially cancer- causing pollutants than do salmon caught in the wild, says a major study that tested contaminants in fish bought around the world.
Quoting from _Scientific_American_, April 1997, page 28:
"Because the [PrP] protein may, in rare circumstances, be able to convert to an infectious form, farm- raised salmon, like beef, could in theory pose a public health threat."
This article is commenting on the discovery that salmon brains also contain the PrP protein, which has both a normal form and an abnormal form, the latter of which is responsible for Mad Cow Disease.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Farm-raised salmon contain significantly more dioxins and other potentially cancer- causing pollutants than do salmon caught in the wild, says a major study that tested contaminants in fish bought around the world.
The benefits of eating salmon for reduction of cardiovascular disease far outweigh the risks demonstrated by this study. Hopefully, the public will consider the cost/benefit before rejecting salmon as unsafe
"notbob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:YPoLb.2727$sv6.9664@attbi_s52...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Not only more dioxins but they are fed pellets made up of rendered bodies of cats and dogs and road kill.
This is total [censored]! Salmon are fed fish protein ...one of the reasons farmed salmon are not really eco-friendly.
The main problem is simply too many people ...period! Thanks to the Pope and other cheaper-by-the- dozen cultures, were overgrazing the world
pasture.
Quoted message said:
We need a good plague, or two. Or, put some of that bio-engineering to
good
Quoted message said:
use and give the human race a lemming gene.
"Hey guys, what say we try bungee jumping without the bungee!!?".
nb
As off the wall as NotBob may seem, there is some truth to what he says. The fact of nature is that when we do become overpopulated, natural controls will eventually take over - plagues, death, etc...
This will unleash a flood of "I told ya so" posts.
Fish farming is necessary if we are going to continue to eat fish. I wish the anti-farming side would put their energy into creating a better way to farm fish rather than just trying to eliminate the idea.
On the good side, it's a wake up call, much like the mad cow episode of late, to tighten up and improve conditions. Of course, alarmists will be alarmists.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Farm-raised salmon contain significantly more dioxins and other potentially cancer- causing pollutants than do salmon caught in the wild, says a major study that tested contaminants in fish bought around the world.
The benefits of eating salmon for reduction of cardiovascular disease far outweigh the risks demonstrated by this study. Hopefully, the public will consider the cost/benefit before rejecting salmon as unsafe
Dennis
So, eat other fish or wild salmon. -- Alan
"If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion, and avoid the people, you might bet- ter stay home." -- James Michener
Quoting from _Scientific_American_, April 1997, page 28:
"Because the [PrP] protein may, in rare circumstances, be able to convert to an infectious form, farm-raised salmon, like beef, could in theory pose a public health threat."
This article is commenting on the discovery that salmon brains also contain the PrP protein, which has both a normal form and an abnormal form, the latter of which is responsible for Mad Cow Disease.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Farm-raised salmon contain significantly more dioxins and other potentially cancer- causing pollutants than do salmon caught in the wild, says a major study that tested contaminants in fish bought around the world.
The benefits of eating salmon for reduction of cardiovascular disease far outweigh the risks demonstrated by this study. Hopefully, the public will consider the cost/benefit before rejecting salmon as unsafe
"The salmon farming industry points out that all the pollutant levels are well within the FDA's legal limits and says other foods eaten far more often, such as beef, are greater sources of exposure."
--Blair "Chicken Little needed a recipe for acorns, is all."
This will unleash a flood of "I told ya so" posts.
Fish farming is necessary if we are going to continue to eat fish. I wish the anti-farming side would put their energy into creating a better way to farm fish rather than just trying to eliminate the idea.
On the good side, it's a wake up call, much like the mad cow episode of late, to tighten up and improve conditions. Of course, alarmists will be alarmists.
Jaquaculture
I hear ya, Jack, and I concur. I figure, we're all going to die from something someday anyway. If we have to farm our seafood (shellfish and fish) because we're over-populated and depleted our waters, so be it. It still tastes good.
While frolicking around in rec.food.cooking, alzelt of AT&T Worldnet
Quoted message said:
So, eat other fish or wild salmon.
How do I know if the salmon I buy is wild? -- Nikitta a.a. #1759 Apatriot(No, not apricot)#18 ICQ# 251532856 Unreferenced footnotes: nut.house.cxcgiOpen ↗ bin/nemwiki.pl?ISFN "The best ballerina is an upside down ballerina. (afdaniain)
This will unleash a flood of "I told ya so" posts.
Fish farming is necessary if we are going to continue to eat fish. I wish the anti-farming side would put their energy into creating a better way to farm fish rather than just trying to eliminate the idea.
On the good side, it's a wake up call, much like the mad cow episode of late, to tighten up and improve conditions. Of course, alarmists will be alarmists.
Quoted message said:
I hear ya, Jack, and I concur. I figure, we're all going to die from something someday anyway. If we have to farm our seafood (shellfish and fish) because we're over-populated and depleted our waters, so be it. It still tastes good.
Okay, flamers, go ahead......
i think there is a potential for long term damage to a much wider area than just the pens. dumping lots of food (and antibiotics) into a pen might do bad things to the bay it is in, and in turn to the species that live (or spawn) in that bay, ... in worst case it would all fan out from there.
in the best case someone would do some science and figure it out - but i'm afraid we are in the modern situation now - with "company scientists" on one side and "environmentalist scientists" on the other. the reader is left to glean a little bit of the story from either side.
but fwiw i think damage to areas around the pens is a risk worth considering.
Not only more dioxins but they are fed pellets made up of rendered bodies of cats and dogs and road kill. This mix is sold to farmers who raise the salmon on the east coast and to the chinese and thailand farmers of shellfish such as shrimp. All the non-wild fish and shell fish are fed this mix. Well now you get to enjoy fido and fluffy twice.
Not only more dioxins but they are fed pellets made up of rendered bodies of cats and dogs and road kill. This mix is sold to farmers who raise the salmon on the east coast and to the chinese and thailand farmers of shellfish such as shrimp. All the non-wild fish and shell fish are fed this mix. Well now you get to enjoy fido and fluffy twice.
Cite, please.
Thanks, Cate
You'll only get those same ones he/she posted the last time someone asked him/her for information backing up his/her claims. None!
Latest report I read was in the Express Newspaper of Riverside California where they showed barrels of dead cats and dogs being process and sent to a rendering factory in Los Angeles and from there they make a food for farmed fish and shellfish. It was published about 2-3 weeks ago. Use your Google and find out the real truth. Matt
Not only more dioxins but they are fed pellets made up of rendered bodies of cats and dogs and road kill. This mix is sold to farmers who raise the salmon on the east coast and to the chinese and thailand farmers of shellfish such as shrimp. All the non-wild fish and shell fish are fed this mix. Well now you get to enjoy fido and fluffy twice.
Take a look at the "legal" limits. I don't think a sane person would want to expose themselves to this much risk. It is your life, after all, so enjoy your tainted fish and meats. Do a Google search...almost any can. Matt
Blair P. Houghton said:
Dennis G. said:
Peter Aitken said:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Farm-raised salmon contain significantly more dioxins and other potentially cancer-causing pollutants than do salmon caught in the wild, says a major study that tested contaminants in fish bought around the world.
The benefits of eating salmon for reduction of cardiovascular disease far outweigh the risks demonstrated by this study. Hopefully, the public will consider the cost/benefit before rejecting salmon as unsafe
"The salmon farming industry points out that all the pollutant levels are well within the FDA's legal limits and says other foods eaten far more often, such as beef, are greater sources of exposure."
--Blair "Chicken Little needed a recipe for acorns, is all."