When setting goals for virtual group rides, why do most cyclists focus on metrics such as distance, speed, or watts per kilogram, when research suggests that these metrics dont necessarily translate to overall performance or enjoyment of the ride? What if we flipped the script and started setting goals based on more nuanced metrics, such as ride feel, cornering technique, or ability to hold a wheel? Would this approach lead to more well-rounded riders who are better equipped to handle the demands of group riding, or would it be a recipe for disaster?
Consider the fact that most virtual group rides take place in a simulated environment, where the laws of physics can be bent and twisted to create unrealistic scenarios. This raises questions about the validity of traditional metrics, which are often based on real-world performance. What if we started setting goals that were more tailored to the virtual environment, such as being able to navigate a virtual course without incident, or working together as a team to achieve a common objective? Would this approach lead to more engaging and enjoyable virtual group rides?
Furthermore, what role does experience play in setting goals for virtual group rides? Do more experienced riders need different goals than less experienced riders, or can the same metrics be used across the board? And how do we balance the need for individualized goals with the need for a cohesive team dynamic? Should we prioritize individual performance over team performance, or can we find a balance that works for everyone?
Perhaps the most pressing question is, whats the ultimate goal of virtual group rides? Is it to simulate real-world riding as closely as possible, or is it to create a unique and engaging experience thats distinct from traditional riding? If its the latter, then perhaps we need to rethink our approach to goal-setting entirely, and focus on creating experiences that are more aligned with the virtual environment.