Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Al frames: "squeeze spacing" okay?

Started by Ryan Cousineau · · Last activity · 28 posts · 1,131 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 December 2006
Last activity
22 December 2006
Original author
Ryan Cousineau
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,131
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–28 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Chalo said:
    damyth said:


    jim beam said:


    i agree. i've also cold set an aluminum frame with no apparent ill effects.

    I'd appreciate if you could share exactly how you were able to cold set
    the rear triangle of aluminum frame. If you can outline the tools and
    procedure used, and in particular, the make of the frame (and the alloy
    6xxx or 7xxx, if known), that would be great.

    Aluminum is just metal, and the mild alloys (e.g. 6061, 7005) used in
    most aluminum bike frames are even reasonably ductile. The main reason
    to refrain from small amounts of cold setting is that the stays of some
    aluminum bikes are very stiff due to their large diameter, and that a
    high amount of force may be required to accomplish the permanent set is
    difficult to control precisely. It's also difficult to anchor a frame
    against high amounts of bending force without subjecting it to the risk
    of dents or crimps elsewhere on the frame (where it is being held).

    Chalo

    All this is true, but you failed to mention ductility as changed by
    (frame) heat treatment. Even on non-Cannondale (i.e. "normal"
    cookie-cutter aluminum) frames I've never seen anyone successfully cold
    set the rear triangle on a finished frame. And I've seen plenty people
    try, with finesse and brute force (and levers of all kinds), to no
    avail.

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    jim beam said:
    Ryan Cousineau said:

    So here I am, with a bit of a dilemma:

    I want, for no very good reason (okay, vertical dropouts) to upgrade
    from my current very funny CX bike (Japanese-made early-80s Canadian
    "Bianchi"😉 to something cheap. I don't need any parts, so a
    frame-upgrading we go.

    The other part of this is I want to be able to use the same wheels as I
    use all summer on my road bike, so 130mm spacing is a must.

    cannondale optimo 9? i've been considering one.

    No, but they're fine bikes. Cannondale sponsored my club until this
    year, and the bikes are admirably sweet. I don't think there've been any
    substantial problems.

    My road bike is a Fetish Cycles SAC, which is their value-leader AL
    frame, which I picked up rather cheaply.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  3. Quoted message said:


    So, has anyone taken a vise to Cannondale chainstays?

    Ball peen hammer, actually. The frame I have with this modification is
    still in service after some 15 years of regular use.

    Chalo

  4. damyth said:


    ...you failed to mention ductility as changed by (frame) heat treatment.

    A heat treated and aged frame (T6 condition) is far less ductile than
    an annealed (T0) frame, but I was referring to the metal's T6
    properties:

    http://www.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=MA6061T6

    Quoted message said:

    Even on non-Cannondale (i.e. "normal" cookie-cutter aluminum) frames
    I've never seen anyone successfully cold set the rear triangle on a
    finished frame. And I've seen plenty people try, with finesse and brute
    force (and levers of all kinds), to no avail.

    I have squished a small few aluminum frames to narrow them from 135mm
    spacing to near 110mm, for use with coaster brakes. I did not find the
    operation particularly difficult, and I was able to do it by hand
    without resort to tools (except a crescent wrench to bend the dropouts
    parallel afterwards). All were ordinary Taiwanese welded 7005 aluminum
    frames with vertically ovalized chainstays and round seatstays.

    Chalo

  5. Chalo said:
    Quoted message said:


    So, has anyone taken a vise to Cannondale chainstays?

    Ball peen hammer, actually. The frame I have with this modification is
    still in service after some 15 years of regular use.

    Good to know. Thanks.

    - Frank Krygowski

  6. Quoted message said:


    Chalo said:


    Quoted message said:


    So, has anyone taken a vise to Cannondale chainstays?

    Ball peen hammer, actually. The frame I have with this modification is
    still in service after some 15 years of regular use.

    Good to know. Thanks.

    I thought I'd mention that I used the (polished) ball peen hammer as a
    punch, holding it in place and driving it with another hammer. This
    allowed much better precision and control than would have been possible
    by just banging on it.

    Chalo

  7. Quoted message said:

    On 21 Dec 2006 16:04:25 -0800, [email hidden] wrote:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    When my family and I rode coast to coast a few years ago, I started
    with nominal 37 mm tires (actual width, closer to 32mm) on my C'dale
    touring bike, since part of our planned route was off-road, on the C&O
    trail. They fit fine at the seat stays, but barely cleared the
    chainstays, which had between 36 & 37 mm clearance. Still, I started
    the ride with those tires.

    Oddly enough, the tires grew; after a couple weeks, they'd expanded to
    where they scraped the chainstays. I didn't know tires would grow. I
    switched to nominal 32 mm tires for the rest of the trip...

    [snip]

    Dear Frank,

    Do you have any idea why those tires grew?

    Do all your tires grow?

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Yes, if you feed them with air ;-)

    Lou
    --
    Posted by news://news.nb.nu

  8. Chalo said:
    Quoted message said:


    So, has anyone taken a vise to Cannondale chainstays?

    Ball peen hammer, actually. The frame I have with this modification is
    still in service after some 15 years of regular use.

    That's be 105 years in "human years"...

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $795 ti frame

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.