F
Frank
Guest
"Dave Kahn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Frank" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
>
> > You cannot make sweeping statement such as *it is no safer to ride on pavements* this is a gross
> > generalisation based on the skimpiest
statistics,
> > flying in the face of common sense, worthy of Paul Smith. Many times
(not
> > all, or even most, but many) you are much safer on the pavement. The
trick
> > is to understand when, where and why.
>
> Justifying illegal and anti-social behaviour by reference to superior skill and experience. That's
> not reminiscent of Paul Smith, is it?
>
I'm not justifying illegal and anti-social behaviour, I'm saying something that is clearly,
logically true.
Improving safety and awareness are good things even if Paul does support them?
Pavement cycling is still part of traffic safety in this country and is quite legal in many places I
think understanding when it is dangerous and when it is safe is generally a good thing?
news:[email protected]...
> "Frank" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
>
> > You cannot make sweeping statement such as *it is no safer to ride on pavements* this is a gross
> > generalisation based on the skimpiest
statistics,
> > flying in the face of common sense, worthy of Paul Smith. Many times
(not
> > all, or even most, but many) you are much safer on the pavement. The
trick
> > is to understand when, where and why.
>
> Justifying illegal and anti-social behaviour by reference to superior skill and experience. That's
> not reminiscent of Paul Smith, is it?
>
I'm not justifying illegal and anti-social behaviour, I'm saying something that is clearly,
logically true.
Improving safety and awareness are good things even if Paul does support them?
Pavement cycling is still part of traffic safety in this country and is quite legal in many places I
think understanding when it is dangerous and when it is safe is generally a good thing?