> Does that mean thge 5900 is the best option from Trek?
>
> Anyone know how the '04 5900 compaes ridewise to the '03 version? Specs
say
> its 1000 grams, which is same as the Orca, which I'm hearing may be a
little
> too light.
The new 5900 is only slightly-lighter than the '03 (mine is an '01 which is
basically unchanged from the '03). The main advantage to the '04 is that it
uses a conventional fork & headset arrangement, so you can use a Chris King
headset if you wish. No more pressed-in lower bearing race.
The 5900 is about as "proven" a bike as you can find; I wouldn't worry about
durability, unless you intend to smash it or have someone run into your
chainstay (but such impacts would probably wreck just about any frame, and
the TDF showed that it was possible to push 700 watts through a single
chainstay... which was *way* more than anyone thought could be done).
Most high-end bike frames have a very short sales lifespan before they
become yesterday's news and get tossed in favor of some other "new &
exciting" design. By contrast, the 5900 is the result of continuous
refinement over the past 13 years. The bugs were worked out many years ago!
> My one problem w/ Calfee is I want to give thebusiness to my LBS. They're
> great guys and I'm loyal. Problem is they only have Trek, Orbea and Felt.
> Any other thoughts?
One of the reasons shops don't carry every line in the world is that they're
comfortable with how a particular brand handles problems & warranties. TREK
is known to be one of the very best in that regard, and that's a very
comforting thing when selling high-end bikes. That's not to say that
Calfee isn't excellent as well, but I have no direct experience with them.
--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
http://www.ChainReactionBicycles.com