"Lanceandrew" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Kayanos gets you a shoe that feels
and responds quite differently.
____
i disagree with you and why turn to inappropriate analogies as opposed to
speaking to the issue of the two shoes?
i think you're doing that because you're not very knowleged on the two
shoes
Quoted message said:and it's easier to speak off-topic. the kayano x has all the technology
of
Quoted message said:the 2100 _plus!_. in fact, both are made for medium for feet w/medium to
low
Quoted message said:arches.
please, give me a break..these are not wildly different shoes at all (as
you
Quoted message said:suggest). the kayano x is a verticle upgrade and it's my opinion that
the
Quoted message said:majority of the people that like a 2100 would also be fine w/a kayano x.
Well, ok, perhaps it was an exaggeration. But to my inexperienced, sensitive
little girly feet, the Kayano felt even more different from the beloved
2080s than the 2090 did, if that makes any sense. Sufficiently so that I
certainly would be worried about spending $110 in order to find out they
felt no better on the road than they did in the store (specifically, both
the sole and the upper felt stiffer). Based on the obviously imperfect tool
of web research, it seems like there's a lot of people who like one or the
other, but few who like both.