Quoted message said:Quoted message said:wafflycat' w*a*ff?y?cat*@?btco*nn?ect.com said:Tony, why would I want to play the game?
Because it will save you time and money.
Den 2006-12-18 12:38:46 skrev Daniel Barlow <[email hidden]>:
Quoted message said:
If the URC Approved Religion now requires that every suggestion that
some part of public transport is not perfect
That's not what it's about though. It's about flaunting your ignorance ("I
refuse to look at the fare structure"😉 and giving an obviously one-sided
view ("like it or not, cars are better"😉. It's not surprising that this
upsets people.
What I'm reading is train supporters saying "it's not perfect but it's
useful", while car apologists reply "trains have this flaw, and this flaw,
and this one too, so cars are better". Going on about how sad you are does
not make you any less one-sided. The only way to convince me that a
rational decision-making process is taking place, is for an anti-train
poster to come up with at least one journey where the train might be the
better alterntive, despite all the imperfections.
Finally, I hope I'm not the only one appalled by residents of the UK
believing that 200 km/h trains are somehow slower than 110 km/h cars. I've
never been a UK resident, but I know the London-York-Newcastle train
averages 150 km/h over 450km. It's just a matter of looking at a timetable.
This covers all trains in Europe
http://reiseauskunft.bahn.de
This gives driving directions and distances all over Europe
http://mappy.co.uk
Erik Sandblom
--
Oil is for sissies