BIKE NOISES your pet peeve and how did you get ride of it

[David Damerell]

Trevor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>Mark Janeba wrote in message ...
>>>>>>OK, here's two of my successes (or at least partial solutions):
>>>>>>1) The proverbial Cinelli 1A creak
>Clarity within the question would have been more of a help.

It might have been if he asked a question. He didn't; he told us about a
squeak he successfully cured, and you appeared with an interjection that
was both unwanted and incorrect.

>I was unaware your bars were without reinforcing sleeve.

.... and ill-informed, something you now appear to be making out as his
fault.
--
David Damerell <[email protected]> Kill the tomato!

 

[Trevor]

David Damerell wrote in message ...
>Trevor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>Mark Janeba wrote in message ...
>>>>>>>OK, here's two of my successes (or at least partial solutions):
>>>>>>>1) The proverbial Cinelli 1A creak
>>Clarity within the question would have been more of a help.
>
>It might have been if he asked a question. He didn't; he told us about a
>squeak he successfully cured, and you appeared with an interjection that
>was both unwanted and incorrect.
>
>>I was unaware your bars were without reinforcing sleeve.
>
>... and ill-informed, something you now appear to be making out as his
>fault.
>--
>David Damerell <[email protected]> Kill the tomato!

Eh? Have you nothing better to do?



Trevor

 

[David Damerell]

Trevor <[email protected]> wrote:
>David Damerell wrote in message ...
>>Trevor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>Mark Janeba wrote in message ...
>>>>>>>>OK, here's two of my successes (or at least partial solutions):
>>>>>>>>1) The proverbial Cinelli 1A creak
>>>Clarity within the question would have been more of a help.
>>It might have been if he asked a question. He didn't; he told us about a
>>squeak he successfully cured, and you appeared with an interjection that
>>was both unwanted and incorrect.

Now, do we suppose Trevor is going to say "Gosh, I was wrong, that wasn't
a question" ... or try an evasion?

>>>I was unaware your bars were without reinforcing sleeve.
>>... and ill-informed, something you now appear to be making out as his
>>fault.

Now, will he admit this?

>Eh? Have you nothing better to do?

Ah, an evasion. No surprise there.

Do _you_ have nothing better to do than post a hundred followups about
your magical aquaplaning flying bicycle and the secret spoke shaping
technique that mysteriously never occurred to anyone else in the last
century?
--
David Damerell <[email protected]> flcl?

 

[Trevor]

David Damerell wrote in message ...
>
>Do _you_ have nothing better to do than post a hundred followups about
>your magical aquaplaning flying bicycle and the secret spoke shaping
>technique that mysteriously never occurred to anyone else in the last
>century?

No not since I've filed the patent app. and registered design. Flying
bicycles rarely crash, much more comfortable ride. Aquaplaning reduces
rolling resistance and is so beneficial in saving energy.

Trevor