guncha said:
Lance is the Man Machiene not the Ironman!
He said in an interview that THIS is the most often asked question.
He will never try because he always wanted to go out on top which he did in cycling.
His age is not bad for an Ironman contender, in fact just about perfect. Compare Dave Scott etc.
The volume of training he has done over the past seven years would put him at the very fittest aerobic endurance athlete in the world. Remember, compared to most triathletes, he is aerobic 6 days a week, four to 8 hours a day, 10 months a years. Quite an advantage in terms of preparing for an event which runs an hour or two longer than a typical tour stage. He does twenty of those every summer at race pace, triathletes dont.
His ability to peak for an event and to mentally ruin his opponents would place him as the top contender, so he would have that advantge as well.
He would bulk up immediately if he trained his swim and he was a very fast swimmer, almost always first out of the water. The swim would not be a problem.
His run was only relatively slow compared to the fastest runners in the world, but he hasnt run in many years.
On the other hand, he would have the fastest bike leg ever given his efficiency and would win the bike leg by such a margin he probably could win on that alone. He is after all the best time trialist in the world, so if Chann McCrae could kill the bike leg, imagine what the very best in the world could do.
He has said he might sneak into a marathon and try to break 2:15, does anyone here think that is slow?
Too bad we will never see him do it. But the very best coaches always said his cycling was a level above his swimming and running, and maybe two levels above the run.