M
M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 2, 2004
Guest
"Dave Wickware" A/K/A Spammin Dave from gLOWLIFE <[email protected]>
wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Nowhere is the split between allopathic and holistic medicine more
> pronounced than in diseases such as cancer. Western science, stuck in the
> notion "one disease, one cause",
Dave, this sentence exemplifies what I like about you. There is no need to
read though line after line of verbiage before one gets to something that is
utterly stupid. You make it easy.
Of course you are wrong. RealScience recognizes that there are myriad causes
of cancer. I have recently dealth with claims of mesothelioma and a benzene
induced cancer of the bone marrow, just to name two simple examples (I like
to keep it simple for the likes of you).
spends billions of dollars in many highly
> focused races to find a cure for a "dis-ease" of a body. Hence the "search
> and destroy" methodology of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, radical
> surgery, all in the sincere desire that to be healed, the cancer must be
> destroyed.
Have you seen any of the more current treatments? Of course you haven't.
> A holistic approach to healing considers all factors of the individual:
> psychological/spiritual, emotional, environmental as well as physical.
Where
> is the cancer? What in that person's life has caused him to create a
cancer
> in that part of the body? What is the physical and genetic disposition of
> the person, his parents? What has been his diet? How stressful is his
work?
> Is he fulfilled emotionally and spiritually? Does he exercise?
All good questions, asked by doctors all the time.
> The Merck Manual, the "physician's bible", has since its first issue in
> 1952, listed all of the causes of immune deficiency. Hundreds, if not
> thousands of articles have appeared in responsible journals throughout the
> world, citing specific causes of cancer.
That is another reason why I like you so much. In the first paragraph,
above, you said that, "Western science, [is] stuck in the
> notion "one disease, one cause", and now you claim that "Hundreds, if not
thousands of articles have appeared in responsible journals throughout the
world, citing specific causes of cancer."
Dave, I know it is hard for you to understand this, but, you just
contradicted yourself in the same post.
The elimination of this dreaded
> disease is possible today. Commitment to a sane approach is all that is
> needed.
Let's get some of the alties committed.
I'll snip the rest of you ****, as you swiped it from
http://www.cesium-chloride.net/germanium_cancer.htm
wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Nowhere is the split between allopathic and holistic medicine more
> pronounced than in diseases such as cancer. Western science, stuck in the
> notion "one disease, one cause",
Dave, this sentence exemplifies what I like about you. There is no need to
read though line after line of verbiage before one gets to something that is
utterly stupid. You make it easy.
Of course you are wrong. RealScience recognizes that there are myriad causes
of cancer. I have recently dealth with claims of mesothelioma and a benzene
induced cancer of the bone marrow, just to name two simple examples (I like
to keep it simple for the likes of you).
spends billions of dollars in many highly
> focused races to find a cure for a "dis-ease" of a body. Hence the "search
> and destroy" methodology of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, radical
> surgery, all in the sincere desire that to be healed, the cancer must be
> destroyed.
Have you seen any of the more current treatments? Of course you haven't.
> A holistic approach to healing considers all factors of the individual:
> psychological/spiritual, emotional, environmental as well as physical.
Where
> is the cancer? What in that person's life has caused him to create a
cancer
> in that part of the body? What is the physical and genetic disposition of
> the person, his parents? What has been his diet? How stressful is his
work?
> Is he fulfilled emotionally and spiritually? Does he exercise?
All good questions, asked by doctors all the time.
> The Merck Manual, the "physician's bible", has since its first issue in
> 1952, listed all of the causes of immune deficiency. Hundreds, if not
> thousands of articles have appeared in responsible journals throughout the
> world, citing specific causes of cancer.
That is another reason why I like you so much. In the first paragraph,
above, you said that, "Western science, [is] stuck in the
> notion "one disease, one cause", and now you claim that "Hundreds, if not
thousands of articles have appeared in responsible journals throughout the
world, citing specific causes of cancer."
Dave, I know it is hard for you to understand this, but, you just
contradicted yourself in the same post.
The elimination of this dreaded
> disease is possible today. Commitment to a sane approach is all that is
> needed.
Let's get some of the alties committed.
I'll snip the rest of you ****, as you swiped it from
http://www.cesium-chloride.net/germanium_cancer.htm