Alot of discussion surrounding elite athletes involves talk of VO2max. From what I can gather VO2max is fundamentally about the delivery of oxygen to the working muscles rather than the muscles utilization of O2.
In heavily populated cities in which people rely primarily upon motorised transport, the air has relatively high concentration of CO, Nitrate and SulphOxide compared with country areas or regions of low population density. The presence of these compounds would not reduce atmospheric concentration of O2, however I would imagine that they would compete for oxygen carrying sites in the blood and I assume, therefore reduce the efficiency of delivery of O2 to the muscles.
Anybody please feel free to correct me if I am misled. However, my question is this. Is there a benefit to VO2max from training in country areas as opposed to training in and around the city?
In heavily populated cities in which people rely primarily upon motorised transport, the air has relatively high concentration of CO, Nitrate and SulphOxide compared with country areas or regions of low population density. The presence of these compounds would not reduce atmospheric concentration of O2, however I would imagine that they would compete for oxygen carrying sites in the blood and I assume, therefore reduce the efficiency of delivery of O2 to the muscles.
Anybody please feel free to correct me if I am misled. However, my question is this. Is there a benefit to VO2max from training in country areas as opposed to training in and around the city?