F
Frank Drackman
Guest
"Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> On Sep 11, 8:46 am, "Frank Drackman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 10, 10:58 pm, "Frank Drackman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> "Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> >> > On Sep 10, 8:44 am, "Frank Drackman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> "Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> >> >> message
>>
>> >> >>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> >> >> > On Sep 9, 3:19 pm, landotter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Sep 9, 1:20 pm, jim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > After doing research on various forums...given the virtually
>> >> >> >> > identical
>> >> >> >> > price of the two units ($30 MSRP price difference), it has become
>> >> >> >> > clear that if both units are equally comfortable for the rider,
>> >> >> >> > that
>> >> >> >> > the Trek Pure Sport has to be the better choice based upon
>> >> >> >> > superior
>> >> >> >> > components and a suspension front.
>>
>> >> >> >> Suspension front serves mainly to weight down the bike on a path
>> >> >> >> bicycle. Don't like the name silkscreened onto the rear mech? Get a
>> >> >> >> new one, they're dirt cheap. I just picked up a new Deore for $15,
>> >> >> >> as
>> >> >> >> good as anybody pootlin' around could ever need. Besides, the Trek
>> >> >> >> factory is powered with the flesh of babies.
>>
>> >> >> > Really? I thought it ran on ******** and hype.
>>
>> >> >> I don't understand the attitude. As a bicycle devotee, wouldn't your
>> >> >> disdain be better directed at organizations that make it harder to
>> >> >> bike
>> >> >> instead of organizations that promote biking?
>>
>> >> > Which "organization that promotes biking" are you referring to?
>>
>> >> Trek-
>>
>> > This is a joke, isn't it?
>>
>> Not on my part.
>
> Trek "promotes biking" to serve their narrow, commercial interests in
> the same way Anheuser-Busch promotes "safe drinking": cynically. Any
> company that positions something like the Portland as a commuter has
> zero credibility in the realm of bicycles-as-transportation.
>
I am sure that Trek can do things better but why the negative focus on the bike industry?
Aren't there other companies/organizations/industries that are bigger threats to biking?
> On Sep 11, 8:46 am, "Frank Drackman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 10, 10:58 pm, "Frank Drackman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> "Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> >> > On Sep 10, 8:44 am, "Frank Drackman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> "Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> >> >> message
>>
>> >> >>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> >> >> > On Sep 9, 3:19 pm, landotter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Sep 9, 1:20 pm, jim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > After doing research on various forums...given the virtually
>> >> >> >> > identical
>> >> >> >> > price of the two units ($30 MSRP price difference), it has become
>> >> >> >> > clear that if both units are equally comfortable for the rider,
>> >> >> >> > that
>> >> >> >> > the Trek Pure Sport has to be the better choice based upon
>> >> >> >> > superior
>> >> >> >> > components and a suspension front.
>>
>> >> >> >> Suspension front serves mainly to weight down the bike on a path
>> >> >> >> bicycle. Don't like the name silkscreened onto the rear mech? Get a
>> >> >> >> new one, they're dirt cheap. I just picked up a new Deore for $15,
>> >> >> >> as
>> >> >> >> good as anybody pootlin' around could ever need. Besides, the Trek
>> >> >> >> factory is powered with the flesh of babies.
>>
>> >> >> > Really? I thought it ran on ******** and hype.
>>
>> >> >> I don't understand the attitude. As a bicycle devotee, wouldn't your
>> >> >> disdain be better directed at organizations that make it harder to
>> >> >> bike
>> >> >> instead of organizations that promote biking?
>>
>> >> > Which "organization that promotes biking" are you referring to?
>>
>> >> Trek-
>>
>> > This is a joke, isn't it?
>>
>> Not on my part.
>
> Trek "promotes biking" to serve their narrow, commercial interests in
> the same way Anheuser-Busch promotes "safe drinking": cynically. Any
> company that positions something like the Portland as a commuter has
> zero credibility in the realm of bicycles-as-transportation.
>
I am sure that Trek can do things better but why the negative focus on the bike industry?
Aren't there other companies/organizations/industries that are bigger threats to biking?