"Nick King" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:I remember seeing a press report years ago about using old train \ tube
lines for a cycle network in and around London. Apparently, there are a
number of derelict tube tunnels under the city that were going to be
tarmaced & lit so as to give cyclists an easier passage in and out of
London.
Does anybody else remember this being reported? I think it might have
been
Quoted message said:Red Ken's idea (if not, I want copyright!!).
It is possible I dreamt it of course!
The main practical difficult with that for actual tubes presumably
would be how to get the cyclists and bikes between tube and ground
level in the central area. If that is what was being proposed at least.
Presumably using the emergency spiral staircases would be out, so there
would need to be lifts at strategically placed intervals along the route.
However as even London Underground, with millions of fare paying passengers
and millions in subsidies can't even manage to keep their existing
fairly modern lifts in operation.......
Another scheme facing severe practical difficulties is OYbikes
which is being trialled in Hammersmith and Fulham.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3856535.stm
Free community bike schems are nothing new, the most famous modern
attempt probably being the Dutch white bikes of the 60's , and
new ones are always being trialled in the States.
http://www.arcata.com/greenbikes/surveys/freebikesurvey.jpg
However they all eventually peter out for all too obvious, and less
obvious reasons. i.e given enough time either one or two bike thieves
will eventually steal all the available free bikes or new bike thieves
will emerge to complete the task. The triumph of hope over experience
writ large in other words.
In this case the bikes are locked. And are charged for at approx £1
an hour. Quite how many bikes the schemes proponents imagine
will be left in one piece - the sight of a yuppie trying to
ride away on a bike with two flat tyres being too hard to resist
for many I'd imagine - after the local social deviants become fully
cognisant with the scheme - is hard to imagine.
And yet the organisers were sufficiently savvy to get the BBC
interested and so generate some free publicity for their doomed
scheme. Although hopefuly only among their potential customers
and not the salivating local deviants.
Then there's the question of h*l*ets. On the TV report the reporter
was shown donning a h*lm*t in a really artistic close-up zooming
shot - at one point the h*lm*t filled the entire screen, but without
saying the actual word. And without explaining how users of the scheme
are supposed to make provision for themselves in that respect So are
they supposed to carry one around with them on the off-chance ?
The off-chance being that there's an unvandalised bike available
exactly when and where they neeed one.
Who's to know?
Curious