Al C-F wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 11:20:51 GMT, Velvet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>I'd have to agree with that too, steady PLUS flashing is good, flashing
>>on own is very BAD, when you might only get a couple of glimpses due to
>>traffic, in those glimpses it is all too possible that the light is in
>>the 'off' cycle of the flash pattern.
>
>
> How slowly do your lights flash? My Vistalights would be hard to
> miss, flashing or constant.
Dunno. Not that slowly, but when I've been a driver, I've found it
easier to spot a cyclist from further in my peripheral vision with a
flashing light, but a lot harder to judge closing speed/distance with
ONLY a flashing light.
And with other traffic around, yes, I've frequently missed the
flashing-only cycle lights simply because of the coincidence of my gaze
flicking away briefly in quick succession (as can be necessary if you're
using mirrors etc). I don't gaze for seconds at a time in my mirrors,
preferring a quick flick back and forth to monitor a potential situation
behind (imminent dangerous overtaking attempt etc), and it's in that
sort of situation that it's very possible for it to coincide with light
being on but masked by other objects, light being off and otherwise
visible, and light being on but me glancing in said mirror.
Some lights do flash rapidly, others do not. IME a steady light will
let you judge closing speed and distance well, and is visible from
further away than a reflector. Also, reflectors don't work well if you
headlight beam isn't lighting them, due to a bend in the road! Flashing
is good for attracting attention.
BUT! Flashing can be too attention-attracting, which is something else
I tend to find if there's no static accompanying them. Because you can
only judge the speed/distance in the instant the light is ON, you have
to spend more time looking at it in order to complete that judgement.
--
Velvet