"Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Mark Probert-February 27, 2004" <Mark [email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Mark Probert-February 26, 2004" <Mark
[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>
> "Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
> >
> > "Rich Shewmaker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> > "]news:[email hidden]...
> > >
> > > "Coleah" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:O3w%b.419678$na.809238@attbi_s04...
> > > >
> > > > "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040226184313.10061.00000517@mb-
> > > > m17.aol.com...
> > > > > You should know this about Rich Shewmaker.
> > > > >
> > > > > He posted: I believe that God does not exist. And I believe that all
> alternative
> > > > medicine
> > > > > is quackery. And I believe that these are both reasonable
> assumptions
> > > > until I
> > > > > am proven wrong.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This Rich fellow is entitled to his beliefs and assumptions,
of
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> course.
> > > > No one is obligated to 'prove' anything differently to him.
> > > >
> > > > If he is over 18, he surely understands that other people also are entitled to be
> > > > honored for their own beliefs and
reasonable
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> > > > assumptions, and he is not required to prove anything to them either.
> > >
> > > I do not hold others "obligated" to prove or disprove, but I do
reserve
> > the
> > > right to point out error when people post statements that
contradictQuoted message said:Quoted message said:our
> > > current scientific body of knowledge. Assertions that olive oil
andQuoted message said:Quoted message said:> citrus
> > > juice can flush stones from the gallbladder or that ginseng
"strengthens
> > the
> > > immune system" will be challenged, because these things are
known
Quoted message said:to
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:be
> > > untrue. And no, I do not think anyone is entitled to be
"honored"
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:for
Quoted message said:> > > believing such nonsense.
> > >
> > > --Rich
> >
> >
> > Prove it wrong then .
>
> Proponents of the flushes are required to show that the gall bladder
hasQuoted message said:Quoted message said:> fewer stones after a flush. In another post you claim that your
doctor
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> recommended them. Did you have their existence determined by
pre-flush
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> ultrasound and did a post-flush ultrasound show that they were gone?
IfQuoted message said:Quoted message said:> not,they you really do not know if the flush was effective in
eliminatingQuoted message said:> them.
I have already stated my experience and the experience of others I
know
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:personaly . Don't try and twist it around to me having to prove
anything
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:to
Quoted message said:you , you are the one who is telling me it doesn't work when from
personalQuoted message said:Quoted message said:experience I know it does , so you prove your arguement .
Sorry, sweetums, but your personal experience proves NOTHING unless you
canQuoted message said:show that there were stones prior to the flush, and there were no stones after the flush. The
only way to do this, absent surgery, is to use ultrasound.As for twisting around, the usenet standard, execept in AltWorld is to
haveQuoted message said:the propenent of some point, etc. provide the proof.
Thus, either prove it..or....your claims are worth what a flush
produces....::: Exactly my point sweetums , you prove to me that it didn't work ,
otherwise your claims have the value of a needlessly removed gallbladder .
Thank you for your non-answer which provides proof that you have no proof that it actually removed
gall stones.