Paul Saunders said:
Well I'd class wild as something that's, well, wild! You know, mountains, coastline, untouched
natural land and stuff. I know it's not technically wild in the strictest sense, but you know what
I mean. On the other hand, I see what you're getting at.
I'd class it as dossing down wherever one could, obviously not in Tescos car park.
Quoted message said:
Well If he knew it would be "unnattended", then why did he ask if it would be "open"? That's what
caused the confusion with me. Not wishing to labour the point, but if the campsite was open then it
couldn't be wild camping, could it?
H e was probably worried about getting chased out by an irate warden.
Quoted message said:
Obviously I just misunderstood what the question meant. Probably just a language misunderstanding.
Nahhh, if we were in our local pub imbibing our favourite tipple it woulkd have been different. I
think it is more of a textual type thingy, e-mail, Usenet etc. are the worse possible means of
conveying our streams of consciousness. Call me a [censored] on Usenet and I willl become your
implacable enemy, call me a [censored] over a pint and you will be welcomed in a 'hail good fellow well
met' type of way.
Anyway, you are all a bunch of geeks with nothing better to do with your lives! [1]
--
JPC
1. Usenet is very bad for ferrous type thingies as well.
--
Please take the [censored] out of deemon when sending an e-mail.