dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers [email hidden] opined the
following...
Quoted message said:Okay Simon - you don't like them, but I like mine. No, it's not uncomfortable
either and it's not too hot.
Without wishing to drag this one into another h*lm*t flame war, how far
had you ridden without a helmet before you started wearing one?
I strongly suspect that those who have "always" worn one will consider
the discomfort to be normal and thus not register it. Those who
habitually cycle without one will notice the difference when forced to
wear one.
Quoted message said:Funnily enough, Vernon doesn't find his
uncomfortable and Nathan finds his Louis Garneau TT and his Met Stradivaruis
positively *kewl*. Not everyone finds them uncomfortable. If yours is, I
suggest it isn't actually the correct one for you.
The correct one for me (From past experience) would basically consist of
a polystyrene hairnet. I overheat rapidly otherwise. The (already
arguable) benefits would then be so small as to make it a public gesture
rather than a practical consideration.
We seem to have a problem in this country where an individual is not
able to take full legal responsibility for their actions. It is a
problem that the climbing centres have suffered from as well. You are
asked to sign a document that shows that you understand the risks and
take responsibility for your actions and their consequences. Despite
this, people who have hurt themselves while climbing (Through no fault
of the centres) have successfully sued the centres with the aid of the
ambulance chasers. The result? Increased insurance premiums and thus
increased entry fees.
I would like to see a legal waiver that would hold up in court that
would allow a rider to opt out of helmet wearing and accept that
responsibility themselves. Until this is possible, I fail to see how
race events can allow competitors any choice.
Jon