UK and Europe · Public discussion

Hovis Update

Started by POHB · · Last activity · 21 posts · 917 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
14 August 2007
Last activity
16 August 2007
Original author
POHB
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
917
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The Hovis London Freewheel (Sun 23 Sept) site has been updated.
    I particularly like the training program: http://www.londonfreewheel.com/bike/yourself.asp

  2. POHB said:

    The Hovis London Freewheel (Sun 23 Sept) site has been updated.
    I particularly like the training program: http://www.londonfreewheel.com/bike/yourself.asp

    Help! my bike failed the health check. I have no tread on my tyres.

    --
    Don Whybrow

    Sequi Bonum Non Time

    Discordianism: Where reality is a figment of your imagination

  3. Don Whybrow said:
    POHB said:

    The Hovis London Freewheel (Sun 23 Sept) site has been updated.
    I particularly like the training program: http://www.londonfreewheel.com/bike/yourself.asp

    Help! my bike failed the health check. I have no tread on my tyres.

    --
    Don Whybrow

    Sequi Bonum Non Time

    Discordianism: Where reality is a figment of your imagination

    Christ, those emails are patronising.

  4. On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:56:16 -0700, POHB <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Hovis London Freewheel (Sun 23 Sept) site has been updated.
    I particularly like the training program: http://www.londonfreewheel.com/bike/yourself.asp

    The course has been shortened!

    Tooley Street has been completely cut from the route, but it is still
    indicated on the clickable map on the website, see below.

    www.johnballcycling.org.uk/misc/hovis

    This shortens the course from 9 miles to 7 1/2 miles.

    They expect 30,000 cyclists, so that means less than 1/2 yard of
    tarmac per cyclist.

  5. spindrift said:

    Christ, those emails are patronising.

    I suspect it's just hopeless incompetence (and being in the hands of the
    marketing people) rather than actual malice. Not that I expect any of
    the organisers actually to ride...

    --
    Cycle tracks will abound in Utopia.
    -- H. G. Wells

  6. Tom Crispin said:

    The course has been shortened!

    Why? Are the roadworks still going?

    R

    --
    People are screaming and the next thing you know you're going too hard.
    You're out of the saddle sprinting up a hill or something and because of
    the cheers you don't feel a thing until you get to the top. Then you
    pay. -- Alison Sydor

  7. Tom Crispin said:

    On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:56:16 -0700, POHB <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Hovis London Freewheel (Sun 23 Sept) site has been updated.
    I particularly like the training program: http://www.londonfreewheel.com/bike/yourself.asp

    The course has been shortened!

    Tooley Street has been completely cut from the route, but it is still
    indicated on the clickable map on the website, see below.

    www.johnballcycling.org.uk/misc/hovis

    This shortens the course from 9 miles to 7 1/2 miles.

    They expect 30,000 cyclists, so that means less than 1/2 yard of
    tarmac per cyclist.

    ..5 Yrd x width of street.

  8. On 15 Aug, 10:27, Tom Crispin <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:56:16 -0700, POHB <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Hovis London Freewheel (Sun 23 Sept) site has been updated.
    I particularly like the training program: http://www.londonfreewheel.com/bike/yourself.asp

    The course has been shortened!

    Tooley Street has been completely cut from the route,

    Isn't Tooley Street all cobbles?

  9. Roger Burton West <[email hidden]>typed

    Quoted message said:

    spindrift wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Christ, those emails are patronising.

    Quoted message said:

    I suspect it's just hopeless incompetence (and being in the hands of the
    marketing people) rather than actual malice. Not that I expect any of
    the organisers actually to ride...

    The website is corny, cheesey and puerile, to say the least!

    I think it's been constructed with the assumption that cyclists aren't
    very clever or sophisticated. The web designers are grossly mistaken.

    I think they are guilty of much that is wrong with the perception of
    cycling in Britain, that bicycles are toys and cyclists too
    stupid/broke/young to use 'real' vehicles for their transport.

    --
    Helen D. Vecht: [email hidden]
    Edgware.

  10. On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:32:31 -0700, POHB <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On 15 Aug, 10:27, Tom Crispin <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:56:16 -0700, POHB <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Hovis London Freewheel (Sun 23 Sept) site has been updated.
    I particularly like the training program: http://www.londonfreewheel.com/bike/yourself.asp

    The course has been shortened!

    Tooley Street has been completely cut from the route,

    Isn't Tooley Street all cobbles?

    No cobbles. Tooley Street forms part of the A200, sometimes referred
    to as "The Lower Road", though technically Lower Road is just one
    short section.

  11. POHB said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tooley Street has been completely cut from the route,


    I think this is so stupid.
    I though the original plan was to set people off from the City Hall
    area, near Tower Bridge.

    Quoted message said:

    Isn't Tooley Street all cobbles?


    I regularly cycle along Tooley Street, and there are no cobbles.
    Are you thinking of the street which runs to the rear of the warehouses
    at Butlers Wharf further along?

  12. Roger Burton West said:
    spindrift said:

    Christ, those emails are patronising.

    I suspect it's just hopeless incompetence (and being in the hands of the
    marketing people) rather than actual malice. Not that I expect any of
    the organisers actually to ride...


    Don't be so cynical. LCC is helping to organise it, and plenty of people
    at LCC do cycle.

  13. Helen Deborah Vecht said:

    The website is corny, cheesey and puerile, to say the least!

    I think it's been constructed with the assumption that cyclists aren't
    very clever or sophisticated. The web designers are grossly mistaken.

    The event isn't targetting cyclists. It is targetting 'new or
    returning' cyclists.

    Quoted message said:

    I think they are guilty of much that is wrong with the perception of
    cycling in Britain, that bicycles are toys and cyclists too
    stupid/broke/young to use 'real' vehicles for their transport.

  14. "Tom Crispin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:56:16 -0700, POHB <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Hovis London Freewheel (Sun 23 Sept) site has been updated.
    I particularly like the training program:
    http://www.londonfreewheel.com/bike/yourself.asp

    The course has been shortened!

    Tooley Street has been completely cut from the route, but it is still
    indicated on the clickable map on the website, see below.

    www.johnballcycling.org.uk/misc/hovis

    This shortens the course from 9 miles to 7 1/2 miles.

    They expect 30,000 cyclists, so that means less than 1/2 yard of
    tarmac per cyclist.

    How's that mileage worked out ? Even including Tooley Street I still find
    the route to be ~7.7 miles not 9 miles as quoted.

  15. "Nildram news" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Tom Crispin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    This shortens the course from 9 miles to 7 1/2 miles.

    They expect 30,000 cyclists, so that means less than 1/2 yard of
    tarmac per cyclist.

    How's that mileage worked out ? Even including Tooley Street I still find
    the route to be ~7.7 miles not 9 miles as quoted.

    And I see the route now goes through Horseguard Av. & Whitehall past Downing
    Street... D'you all reckon Gordon's planing to get his bike out ?!

  16. On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:03:50 +0100, "Nildram news" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Tom Crispin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:56:16 -0700, POHB <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Hovis London Freewheel (Sun 23 Sept) site has been updated.
    I particularly like the training program:
    http://www.londonfreewheel.com/bike/yourself.asp

    The course has been shortened!

    Tooley Street has been completely cut from the route, but it is still
    indicated on the clickable map on the website, see below.

    www.johnballcycling.org.uk/misc/hovis

    This shortens the course from 9 miles to 7 1/2 miles.

    They expect 30,000 cyclists, so that means less than 1/2 yard of
    tarmac per cyclist.

    How's that mileage worked out ? Even including Tooley Street I still find
    the route to be ~7.7 miles not 9 miles as quoted.

    I have measured the shortened course using grid references at key
    points and find it to be 6 miles 1371 yards.

    The spreadsheet calculations can be seen here:
    www.johnballcycling.org.uk/misc/freewheeldist


  17. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    This shortens the course from 9 miles to 7 1/2 miles.

    They expect 30,000 cyclists, so that means less than 1/2 yard of
    tarmac per cyclist.

    How's that mileage worked out ? Even including Tooley Street I still find
    the route to be ~7.7 miles not 9 miles as quoted.

    I have measured the shortened course using grid references at key
    points and find it to be 6 miles 1371 yards.

    The spreadsheet calculations can be seen here:
    www.johnballcycling.org.uk/misc/freewheeldist

    Oh I wasn't questioning YOUR mileage... was more puzzled by TFL's !
    Anyway, if the route carries on shrinking, it'll soon be going round St.
    James Park and that'll be it !

  18. On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:08:40 +0100, "Nildram news" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >
    > This shortens the course from 9 miles to 7 1/2 miles.
    >
    > They expect 30,000 cyclists, so that means less than 1/2 yard of
    > tarmac per cyclist.

    How's that mileage worked out ? Even including Tooley Street I still find
    the route to be ~7.7 miles not 9 miles as quoted.

    I have measured the shortened course using grid references at key
    points and find it to be 6 miles 1371 yards.

    The spreadsheet calculations can be seen here:
    www.johnballcycling.org.uk/misc/freewheeldist

    Oh I wasn't questioning YOUR mileage... was more puzzled by TFL's !

    Yep. Putting the leg along Tooley Street into the spreadsheet gives a
    distance of 7 miles 1567 yards, or just under 8 miles.

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, if the route carries on shrinking, it'll soon be going round St.
    James Park and that'll be it !

    Or even the Victoria Memorial.

  19. In article <[email hidden]>, Tom Crispin
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    The event isn't targetting cyclists. It is targetting 'new or
    returning' cyclists.


    Isn't it more like getting more pedestrians on bikes?

  20. Tom Crispin said:


    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, if the route carries on shrinking, it'll soon be going round St.
    James Park and that'll be it !

    Or even the Victoria Memorial.

    I was going to make some witty reply re. the Freewheel disappearing up
    its own ar******.
    But in that case it is disappearing up Her Imperial Majesty, Empress of
    India and Queen of the Dominions. Which is another matter entirely.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.