Originally posted by DesertRider
Anyone?
Originally posted by eddiebrannan
he means how many people have wheels designed for weenies when they're really chubbies that ought to be on 36 spoke 3x and broke em etc
Originally posted by DesertRider
I know, I know.....just stirring things up! Seems like the riders that spend more of the morning at the coffee house than riding are the ones that are the most obsessed with the weight thing. I'm not a retro grouch!!!
Originally posted by HarryS
I lightened my Specialized S-works bike from 18lbs to 15lbs without compomising performance. Yes it cost a bit of money but equating lightness with a lack of performance or durability is not true if one doesn't do crazy things. Here are a few examples of inexpensive "weight loss" that does nor compromise performance"
BTP cages 15g each versus 50g total savings 70g cost $50
Continental Supersonic tires 50g versus 100g savings 100g cost $20
Veloflex Pave tires 180g each versus 240g savings 120g cost $70
Megawire cables and housing 125g total versus 180g savings 55g cost $50
Selle Italia SLR sattle 135g versus 270g savings 135g cost $70
These are just the cheap parts totalling a little over 1lbs all of which have improved performance without compromising safety or longevity for a total cost of $260. Now some of these items may needed to be replaced anyway like tires and tubes...
I could give you details on the remaining 2 lbs which cost a bit more
Originally posted by HarryS
Of course my Topolinos are another 200g lighter than the Mavic wheels so thats over 1 pound of rotational weight.
Originally posted by drewski
how are your Topolinos? stiff enough with the kevlar spokes? stay true well?
not that i can afford to run out and get some, but wondering what your impressions of them are vs. the Mavics you mentioned (SSC SL?)
Originally posted by DesertRider
Anyone?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.