"Marc Goodman" <[email protected]> wrote
>> The problem with saying Seth or anyone else was outmatched is this: There
>> *is* no match taking place here.
>
> Buddha sat before a wall, and when he arose he was enlightened.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:24:02 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:03:07 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:48:52 +0100, Adam Funk <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On 2006-04-21, Doug Kanter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> /11
>>>
>>>That's a strange trolleration.
>>
>>Doug couldn't troll Seth.
>
>One thing about Seth: Once he realized that he was outmatched, he
>embraced his role. Duhg seems more like Dank, sullenly and endlessly
>trying to claim a one-up position, in spite of the disastrous results
>of his all previous attempts.
Yup. And like Dank, he just keeps circling around the periphery of the
campsite, just at the edge of the light cast by the fire, head down,
sniffing the ground, wary of getting smacked down yet again but for
some perverse reason utterly incapable of leaving. Think feral dog. Or
feral Duhg. Whatever.
>>The melt-down is nearly complete. He's gone from sputtering, impotent
>>rage to incoherence, all in the space of 48 hours.
>
>He *has* trotted out nearly all the desperation moves on the
>checklist, including the ever-popular "yawn" when he couldn't think of
>a comeback and the petulant "STFU" when he'd boxed himself in. By my
>list, there are still a few left, though.
>
Did he do "get a life" yet? Or any of its many variations?
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:28:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>The problem with saying Seth or anyone else was outmatched is this: There
>*is* no match taking place here.
Have you had better luck posting your personal ads on other froups?
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:09:20 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>"Kevin S. Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>
>
>> Did he do "get a life" yet? Or any of its many variations?
>
>In the script, that's your line.
You're following a script? That's difficult to believe, given your
poor grasp of the English language and your even poorer attempt at
portraying yourself as an erudite, cosmopolitan swell -- unless you've
somehow gotten your hands on a copy of "Usenet for Duhggies: The
Musical."
Is your meltdown complete by the third act? Because you know what
Chekov said about the gun on the wall.
"Kevin S. Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:09:20 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>"Kevin S. Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>
>>
>>> Did he do "get a life" yet? Or any of its many variations?
>>
>>In the script, that's your line.
>
> You're following a script?
The script has existed since I was old enough to become aware of such
things. You think you're original. You're not. You were stamped using an
unfortunate cookie cutter.
Adam Funk <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0616-4, 04/21/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
> On 2006-04-21, [email protected] <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I suppose some kind soul could send you an earl where you
>> would find the
>
> IFYPFY.
>
Damn good thing, too. Earl's what we calls 'em, and how they're
spoke.
--
TeaLady (mari)
"The principal of Race is meant to embody and express the utter
negation of human freedom, the denial of equal rights, a
challenge in the face of mankind." A. Kolnai
Avast ye scurvy dogs ! Thar be no disease in this message.
Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:36:32 -0400, TMG <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>BTW - your friends in aue have a correction for you.
>
>
> Perhaps they are in need of a little . . . correction, Mr. Torrance.
Do I get to pick? I chose Diana Rigg as Miss Emma Peal to administer the
"correction".
Wait,...were we administrating correction to me, or something I've
already doled out?
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:18:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>"Kevin S. Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:09:20 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>"Kevin S. Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>
>>>> Did he do "get a life" yet? Or any of its many variations?
>>>
>>>In the script, that's your line.
>>
>> You're following a script?
>
>The script has existed since I was old enough to become aware of such
>things.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:02:41 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:24:02 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
<snip>
>>He *has* trotted out nearly all the desperation moves on the
>>checklist, including the ever-popular "yawn" when he couldn't think of
>>a comeback and the petulant "STFU" when he'd boxed himself in. By my
>>list, there are still a few left, though.
>>
>Did he do "get a life" yet? Or any of its many variations?
I don't think so. But he did try slipping in a cross-post to AUK.
What a tired old chestnut that is. He shows no originality and no
humor. If he even showed some good humor about any of this, he might
be halfway decent company in a newsgroup confab. But no, he's all
***** and moan and boast and sneer.
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:02:41 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:24:02 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>>He *has* trotted out nearly all the desperation moves on the
>>>checklist, including the ever-popular "yawn" when he couldn't think of
>>>a comeback and the petulant "STFU" when he'd boxed himself in. By my
>>>list, there are still a few left, though.
>>>
>>Did he do "get a life" yet? Or any of its many variations?
>
> I don't think so. But he did try slipping in a cross-post to AUK.
> What a tired old chestnut that is. He shows no originality and no
> humor. If he even showed some good humor about any of this, he might
> be halfway decent company in a newsgroup confab. But no, he's all
> ***** and moan and boast and sneer.
>
> BW
Oooh....a confab. Continue rubbing your OED in your crotch this evening.
Come up with some more pointlessly obscure words by tomorrow.
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 04:53:56 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
><[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:02:41 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:24:02 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>He *has* trotted out nearly all the desperation moves on the
>>>>checklist, including the ever-popular "yawn" when he couldn't think of
>>>>a comeback and the petulant "STFU" when he'd boxed himself in. By my
>>>>list, there are still a few left, though.
>>>>
>>>Did he do "get a life" yet? Or any of its many variations?
>>
>> I don't think so. But he did try slipping in a cross-post to AUK.
>> What a tired old chestnut that is. He shows no originality and no
>> humor. If he even showed some good humor about any of this, he might
>> be halfway decent company in a newsgroup confab. But no, he's all
>> ***** and moan and boast and sneer.
>
>Oooh....a confab. Continue rubbing your OED in your crotch this evening.
I see why your command of the language is so poor if that's how you
use a dictionary. Just because you read Penthouse that way doesn't
mean other people read like that.
>Come up with some more pointlessly obscure words by tomorrow.
"Confab" is obscure? Since when? You ought to get out more. It
might improve your mood as well as your ability to communicate.
I had a very enjoyable evening at a baseball game with a couple of
friends. Did you do anything fun?
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:03:19 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:28:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>The problem with saying Seth or anyone else was outmatched is this: There
>>*is* no match taking place here.
>
>Have you had better luck posting your personal ads on other froups?
He ought to post in whatever newsgroup that PETA apologist was in. The
one who lectured everybody about humanely killing meat animals and got
all skeeved out about people cooking lobsters. She had a lot in
common with Duhg, though I'm betting, unlike her, he's not sentimental
about lobsters.
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:24:41 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>But no, he's all
>***** and moan and boast and sneer.
And those are just the nouns. A few verbs help to round out the
picture: sputter, stammer, shout, pout, whine, cry, blubber,
threaten, demand, and lie.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:27:19 -0400, TMG <[email protected]> wrote:
>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:36:32 -0400, TMG <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>BTW - your friends in aue have a correction for you.
>>
>>
>> Perhaps they are in need of a little . . . correction, Mr. Torrance.
>
>Do I get to pick? I chose Diana Rigg as Miss Emma Peal to administer the
>"correction".
>
You'll take Wilford Brimley and LIKE IT, peasant.
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:26:07 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:24:41 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>But no, he's all
>>***** and moan and boast and sneer.
>
>And those are just the nouns. A few verbs help to round out the
>picture: sputter, stammer, shout, pout, whine, cry, blubber,
>threaten, demand, and lie.
Helping Duhg in his quest for "pointlessly obscure" words? That's
mighty white of you, as they used to say.
Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:27:19 -0400, TMG <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Do I get to pick? I chose Diana Rigg as Miss Emma Peal to administer the
>>"correction".
>>
>
> You'll take Wilford Brimley and LIKE IT, peasant.
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:25:18 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:26:07 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:24:41 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>But no, he's all
>>>***** and moan and boast and sneer.
>>
>>And those are just the nouns. A few verbs help to round out the
>>picture: sputter, stammer, shout, pout, whine, cry, blubber,
>>threaten, demand, and lie.
>
>Helping Duhg in his quest for "pointlessly obscure" words? That's
>mighty white of you, as they used to say.
>
It always comes back to me being a black guy, doesn't it?
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:41:36 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:57:34 +0100, "Mike Lyle"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:01:53 +0100, "Mike Lyle"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Another group I use gets
>>>> deliberately bot-flooded at unpredictable intervals by somebody bent
>>>> on destruction, so, reasonably enough, I'm sensitive.
>>>
>>> That ought to get you the hawt chicks.
>>
>>OK, I did explain the problem. It looks as though I have to block most
>>senders to this thread: on Usenet freedom principles, I'm sorry to have
>>to do it, but this is self-defence.
>
>Cue the marching band playing "Stars and Stripes Forever."
Remember it's a "pre-emptive strike" and not an "invasion." Mission
accomplished.
--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"What do you expect from a bunch of kiwi smoking sheep herders?" --
oTTo
On 2006-04-21, Kevin S Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> The melt-down is nearly complete. He's gone from sputtering, impotent
> rage to incoherence, all in the space of 48 hours.
