You may be very possibly correct on all the points you raised. Again, i was expressing an opinion which you are free to disagree with. I have learned a lot from your comments . How you disagree betrays you however.alienator said:Well, the clean up will never be total, because no system can operate perfectly. And are you so sure that riders "temporarily affected" will be cleared quickly? What if it turns out that Basso and Ulrich are innocent? Nothing has gone to trial. There is only suspicion; yet, if Ulrich ends up being innocent, then because of suspicion he likely missed his last opportunity to win the tour. Is that fair by you? There are plenty of examples of people found innocent who yet remain tainted in the eye of the public.
And that strong "evidence" is as yet unpublished in its entirety. No one here knows exactly what evidence there is. Moreover, that evidence hasn't been weighed, so the veracity of that evidence has yet to be determined.
There didn't have to be compelling evidence at all. All that had to happen was for the public eye to look upon these teams the wrong way. Then, the teams have to look at preserving their sponsorship. They already saw what quickly happened to Liberty Sigueros/Astana Wurth to see what would happen if sponsorship became jeopardized. Losing the Tour means far less than losing sponsorship. Sporting history is rife with stories wherein difficult decisions were made to please sponsors.
You don't know who has definitely had contact with who, yet. And if all it takes is guilt by association to smear someone or convict them...well, then cycling isn't worth saving. Again you, me, no one in the public knows the facts yet. In fact, the investigation is not complete, so the authorities don't know the facts and what they mean just yet.
This is a perfect example of intellectual laziness. You only know what you've read in the press or heard on the news, so based on that and whatever personal biases you have, you've already determined guilt in cases about which you have no real factual knowledge.
Your experience really contributes nothing to this discourse. Your experience only relates to your experience and your views. I think most people, even if they haven't competed on an "international level" would understand the discipline necessary to succeed at cycling.
I'm really chuffed that you're able to read a public profile. BTW, it's PhD, not PHD.
I was sincerely wishing you success on your endeavor.
Pointing out my not releasing the shift key when typing the "h" in Phd is a perfect example of "intellectual pettiness".