Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss?



"James Connell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> Kirk Davison wrote:
>
> > I looked and thought his stuff was excellent!
>
>
> for a pro shooter - it's average and only average. nothing
> spectacular - many of the shots are miscomposed, and a
> (too large) number are off on the exposure/lighting.

**Eh????? I thought that Steve was an "award winning"
photographer??? Doesn't say much for his "awards" does it???

LOL
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
>
>
>
>Kirk Davison wrote:
>>
>> I looked and thought his stuff was excellent!
>
>Thanks, Kirk. Nice of you to say so. :eek:)
>
>
>Steve Kramer Chiang Mai, Thailand

******Good old Kirk...................Yet another one of
Kramers 'sock puppets".

We're losing count Stevie.............How many have you
invented now????

Can 'Pickled Drunk' be far away????
 
Kibo informs me that Steve Wertz <[email protected]>
stated that:

>This is proof that cameras cause brain damage.

So what's /your/ excuse?

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it
is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^-----------------------------------------------
----------------
 
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:31:42 +0800, "headquarters"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Too slow for sports or action shots.

Let the pissing begin... but you won't find Steve joining in
because a good photographer can take great shots with a
kodak throw away.

Practice safe eating - always use condiments
 
"Steve Wertz" <[email protected]> wrote
in message
> This is proof that cameras cause brain damage.

**Tripods can cause brain damage as well, if you get hit
with one. Ask Mrs Kramer. She's been on the receiving end of
more than one of Steve's rages. Steve's a bit of a beast
when he's swinging a tripod about....

>
> What a bunch of morons over there in the photo groups.
>
> -sw
 
headquarters wrote:
>
> Sigma's digital equipment is better than Nikon for
> portriat and landscape. Too slow for sports or
> action shots.

why would anyone think that, unless they were constrained
by budget?

>
> "Randall Ainsworth" <[email protected]> wrote in
> message news:200620040731088863%[email protected]...
> > In article
> > <[email protected]>,
> > Orville Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > His stuff isn't bad, certainly better than any Sigma
> > product could ever produce. But then we've never seen
> > any of your work.
 
In article <[email protected]>, Takin Gthepiss
<[email protected]> wrote:

> "James Connell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > Kirk Davison wrote:
> >
> > > I looked and thought his stuff was excellent!
> >
> >
> > for a pro shooter - it's average and only average.
> > nothing spectacular - many of the shots are miscomposed,
> > and a (too large) number are off on the
> > exposure/lighting.
>
>
> **Eh????? I thought that Steve was an "award winning"
> photographer??? Doesn't say much for his "awards"
> does it???

Awards are like hemmoroids. Sooner or later every
asshole gets one.
 
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:43:48 +1000, Lionel <[email protected]> wrote:

>Kibo informs me that Steve Wertz
><[email protected]> stated that:
>
>>This is proof that cameras cause brain damage.
>
>So what's /your/ excuse?

Egads. What a comeback.

_How_ old are you?

-sw
 
Think what? I was going to buy sigma as its sensor chip is
able to read 3 colors in each pixel without the distortion
found in other digital cameras.

It's reasonably priced and has a lot of lenses available,
but ended up buying the sony 808. Since it is used mainly
for product shots, the sony is fine. Works great with the
dedicated flash.

"Crownfield" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> headquarters wrote:
> >
> > Sigma's digital equipment is better than Nikon for
> > portriat and
landscape.
> > Too slow for sports or action shots.
>
> why would anyone think that, unless they were constrained
> by budget?
>
>
> >
> > "Randall Ainsworth" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > message
> > news:200620040731088863%[email protected]...
> > > In article
> > > <[email protected]>,
> > > Orville Wright <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > His stuff isn't bad, certainly better than any Sigma
> > > product could
ever
> > > produce. But then we've never seen any of your work.
 
sf <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:31:42 +0800, "headquarters"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Too slow for sports or action shots.
>
> Let the pissing begin... but you won't find Steve joining
> in because a good photographer can take great shots with a
> kodak throw away.
>
>
> Practice safe eating - always use condiments

I couldn't agree more about a truly good photographer. A
while back, I took a color photography class, where the
instructor displayed these fantastic photos. She then asked
the class to guess what type of camera we thought she'd
used. As expected the class suggested, Nikon, Leica,
Hasselblad...all wrong. She used a Kodak Instamatic and a
Type 126 film cartridge she'd picked up at K-Mart.

Cheers
 
Kibo informs me that Steve Wertz <[email protected]>
stated that:

>On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:43:48 +1000, Lionel
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Kibo informs me that Steve Wertz
>><[email protected]> stated that:
>>
>>>This is proof that cameras cause brain damage.
>>
>>So what's /your/ excuse?
>
>Egads. What a comeback.

It was a lot better than the idiotic insult that it was in
response to.

>_How_ old are you?

Old enough to have grown out of the idea that it's amusing
to flood other peoples' newsgroups with ****. And you?

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it
is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^-----------------------------------------------
----------------
 
Lionel wrote:

> Kibo informs me that Steve Wertz
> <[email protected]> stated that:
>
>
>>On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:43:48 +1000, Lionel
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Kibo informs me that Steve Wertz
>>><[email protected]> stated that:
>>>
>>>
>>>>This is proof that cameras cause brain damage.
>>>
>>>So what's /your/ excuse?
>>
>>Egads. What a comeback.
>
>
> It was a lot better than the idiotic insult that it was in
> response to.
>
>
>>_How_ old are you?
>
>
> Old enough to have grown out of the idea that it's amusing
> to flood other peoples' newsgroups with ****. And you?

Then please stop doing it. Heck, it isn't even about
politics, gun

--
Michael Wolf

-----

Cthulhu For President. Why settle for the lesser evil?

remove stopspam to reply
 
"Lionel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> Kibo informs me that Steve Wertz
> <[email protected]> stated that:
>
> >On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:43:48 +1000, Lionel
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>Kibo informs me that Steve Wertz
> >><[email protected]> stated that:
> >>
> >>>This is proof that cameras cause brain damage.
> >>
> >>So what's /your/ excuse?
> >
> >Egads. What a comeback.
>
> It was a lot better than the idiotic insult that it was in
> response to.
>
> >_How_ old are you?
>
> Old enough to have grown out of the idea that it's amusing
> to flood other peoples' newsgroups with ****.

**Other people's newsgroups???

So YOU claim ownership of a newsgroup, do you???

Or are you just the list policeman???

> And you?
>
> --
> W
> . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it
> is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------
> ------------------
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back