Kyle Leogrande is ****** cause USADA cheated to catch him cheating?

[[email protected]]

Am I missing something?

Kyle Leogrande is ******.

Kyle cheated at Superweek in 2007.

Kyle used drugs and won.

Doping Agency tested B sample without the needed A sample positive.

Doping Agency cheated to catch a cheat.

Kyle failed B sample. Proof he cheated.

Kyle is ******!

Well you know what asshole? So are all the other cyclists.

Now you are as angry as we are, Kyle Notgrande.

 

[bdbafh]

On Jan 31, 6:16 am, [email protected] wrote:
> Am I missing something?
>
> Kyle Leogrande is ******.
>
> Kyle cheated at Superweek in 2007.
>
> Kyle used drugs and won.
>
> Doping Agency tested B sample without the needed A sample positive.
>
> Doping Agency cheated to catch a cheat.
>
> Kyle failed B sample. Proof he cheated.
>
> Kyle is ******!
>
> Well you know what asshole? So are all the other cyclists.
>
> Now you are as angry as we are, Kyle Notgrande.

How about they get Vince McMahon involved and "chair" a random rider
just to make things interesting? WHAT?!?! You say that's not in the
rules? That it wouldn't be in the interest of the participating
cyclists to end one of their seasons (pseudo randomly) by cracking a
folding chair across their torso? WHAT RULES?

commentator: "OOh. He didn't see that coming."
(thinking Kenny Blankenship would be great for this one)

take it over to Trust but Verify.

-bdbafh

 

[ronaldo_jeremiah]

Duped -

Cheating on behalf of the testing agency leads to Type I errors. This
is a bad thing for honest riders, such as yourself. This should make
you angry whether or not John Tatdoe is guilty, which is something no
one knows but John Tatdoe himself.

-rj