Did I not call it correctly?Colorado Ryder said:Why should someone provide information because you make a unfounded allegation? The burden of proof is upon the accuser. Therefore provide more proof than a faked memo.
Seems to me this whole question is bogus. Only hard core politicos seem to care. The average voter didn't give a rip about what Bush did or didn't do 30 years ago. Most voters saw it for what it was...a political operation.
How come you're not questioning Kerry for not releasing his records during the election. Wonder why that is?
Finally showing your true colors. Can't keep away from the conspiracy theories can you? Maybe, just maybe you can't accept the fact that more people wanted Bush than the other guy. You know the one that couldn't decide where he stood on any issue. The one that wouldn't release his records during the election. Yes those were valid reasons to vote for Kerry.Wurm said:Did I not call it correctly?
I'm sure many voters, had they had the truth in front of them about the Non-War Chickenhawk Pres., would have pulled a different lever last November.
But that wouldn't have worked in the end either, because the Repub's frauded the results anyway. See Ohio.
That is patently false. So there are only 2 conclusions here: either you have the I.Q. of a small soap dish and have no ability to distinguish truth from fiction, or you are a disingenuous and lying hack - in the same manner as the foolish Neo-Con's you emulate. Neither is anything to be proud of.Colorado Ryder said:Maybe, just maybe you can't accept the fact that more people wanted Bush than the other guy.
Wurm has returned to conspiracyland.Wurm said:That is patently false. So there are only 2 conclusions here: either you have the I.Q. of a small soap dish and have no ability to distinguish truth from fiction, or you are a disingenuous and lying hack - in the same manner as the foolish Neo-Con's you emulate. Neither is anything to be proud of.
See the report/investigation filed in the official Congressional Record by Rep. Conyers on the Ohio vote scam, and while you're at it, count all of the votes that should have been counted and the voters that should have been allowed to vote.
What is more, check the situations as they played out in other very close states, such as NC, NM, FL, etc.
Your criminally insane candidate did NOT win the actual, real vote in '04, nor in '00.
Yes, "W" didn't win the REAL vote...only the virtual one...I agree that lowly is in another world...Colorado Ryder said:Wurm has returned to conspiracyland.
Colorado Ryder said:The average voter didn't give a rip about what Bush did or didn't do 30 years ago. Wonder why that is?
Superb postHypnospin said:the average voter is so insulated from reality that the proof of gross lack of responsibiltiy in meeting the terms and conditions of military service by their very president that they may well not be outraged.
this does not mean there is not reason for outrage, just that their perspective is based on some perverse justifaction to support this president even as he leads the perpetration of numerous military and other crimes.
but as the families of those affected by the bush policies in the us and abroad become weary of the consequences, this hypocritical lack of obligation to the military he now leads into criminal war becomes larger in the public eye.
both he and cheney were too busy to participate in their country's military actions due to privelege and silver spoon preferential treatment as their peers were being shipped off to become mangled as surely as today.
one need only look at the bush approval ratings
(and these rating systems are without fail sanitized to the greatest possible extent)
to see the type of statement you foist on us here can have no credibility except to those who would ingnore fact, justify, then side with and apologize for the criminal syndicate that is the bush administration.
Sorry nit-wit, but the above are the facts, of which you have never let stand in your way.Colorado Ryder said:Wurm has returned to conspiracyland.
Oh but I'm afaraid to tell you Hypno that that statement is all CONSPIRACY!! You're all after Poor Innocent George (PIG). Stop it right now!!Hypnospin said:one need only look at the bush approval ratings
(and these rating systems are without fail sanitized to the greatest possible extent)
to see the type of statement you foist on us here can have no credibility except to those who would ingnore fact, justify, then side with and apologize for the criminal syndicate that is the bush administration.
Facts? Right! I guess Kerry didn't think that was factual enough to challenge the election. I do commend you for staying up with all the current conspiracy theories.Wurm said:Sorry nit-wit, but the above are the facts, of which you have never let stand in your way.
Only you, Wurm, engage in conspiracy ****.Wurm said:Oh but I'm afaraid to tell you Hypno that that statement is all CONSPIRACY!! You're all after Poor Innocent George (PIG). Stop it right now!!
Kerry is bought and paid-for, just as the Repub's are.Colorado Ryder said:Facts? Right! I guess Kerry didn't think that was factual enough to challenge the election. I do commend you for staying up with all the current conspiracy theories.
Thanks for keeping the rest of us up to date on all the conspiracy theories.Wurm said:Kerry is bought and paid-for, just as the Repub's are.
Now, if you can factually refute any of Conyer's report, then do so.
**crickets chirping**
that candidates, who recieve funds from thier repective parties/buisiness interest's, have to tout said party/buisiness interest line is not a "theory" They are rented "mouth-pieces" for thier respective donor's.Colorado Ryder said:Thanks for keeping the rest of us up to date on all the conspiracy theories.
Typical conspiracy ****. Post something then ask others to refute it. Nice.
Right! Isn't it interesting how the RNC just knew it was going to come down to Ohio. Good thing they had their plan in place.Wurm said:Yep. Ohio was a conspiracy all right - on the part of the RNC and Blackwell and his state gov't parasites. The evidence is there before you for all to see. The problem with you CR is: you can't refute it, even if you tried because it's the truth.
Calling thousands of registered (but disenfranchised) voters who were witnesses, along with highly experienced legislators "conspirators" is the pot calling the kettle black.
I'll leave you now to your delusional world.
You do have a point BUT, conversely, the Republican "apparatus DOES have the capacity to do such act's. These guy's aren't the nice guy's maybe you would like to think. To a degree, it applies to thier counterpart's also. That is why I have never affiliated myself w/ either. I, 4 times out of 5, have picked the lesser of two evil's after entering the polling placeColorado Ryder said:Right! Isn't it interesting how the RNC just knew it was going to come down to Ohio. Good thing they had their plan in place.
The funny thing about you is that all you do is attack and throw BS. There hasn't been an original thought from you yet. If someone disagrees with you then thay must be a neo-con, bushite, delusional. I guess it is true people on the liberal do have "tolerance" for different opinions. You get your "knowledge" from political fringe sites. All your **** comes from political motivated sites or people.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.