JMW said:(Axel of the North!) said:
good work, JRH, good work.
A pat on the back from a schizotypal pedophile.
I'm sure he's quite pleased.
JRH said:Quoted message said:good work, JRH, good work.
You're a bit behind the times Axel, but what I said still remains very
valid!
that's okay. i've seen Hodges little "i" and your Bill's tongue, i
keep track as best a schizotypal pedophile can.
as the resident schizotypal pedophile, i hereby bless you, Hudson. may
you molest with the purest of intentions, may your passion find a
young and loving place and may the bobbys never find out!
what i don't like is how JMW uses schizotypal as a label, a negative
label. i am of the conviction that it is neither good nor bad. it can
make a person better than average or worse than average, but it can
most certainly complicate matters. i think being schizotypal would
enable a person to be a much better lover than the dull,
standard-brained youngsters of today. (hint hint)
who is easily overwhelmed by another's needs? not just aware of it but
becomes the other's needs? who has the kind of mind that is highly
sexually charged, without herbs or drugs or psychological fixations?
the schizotypal. who is naturally geared for the mysticism and has
enhanced perception and control of their own bodies? think tantra,
mofos! it is the schizotypal who is in an ideal position for these
things, as long as they weren't mistreated in their youth, as long as
they get to develop a relatively healthy mind.
go ahead and alert the authorities in my area, John M. Williams. we'll
see what happens. remember, Mr. Williams... G-d is *always* watching!
