S
Steve
Guest
.... or is it for the UCI.
Anyway, if his Stage 17 urine sample was so radioactive for exogenous
testosterone, why don't they test his other pee samples for the same thing?
Surely he gave subsequent samples, especially after the TT. Would that not
be better than a B sample ?
Will they be able to scientifically prove that it is indeed his sample, not
a "donor".
The lab said that the test is foolproof, a test equipment manufacturer said
that there is an margin of error and my common sense says that nobody, or
test is foolproof. Damm, he has a hell of a high legal mountain to conquer.
This whole thing does not make sense. Wait, didn't David Byrne write a song
about this?
Steve
Anyway, if his Stage 17 urine sample was so radioactive for exogenous
testosterone, why don't they test his other pee samples for the same thing?
Surely he gave subsequent samples, especially after the TT. Would that not
be better than a B sample ?
Will they be able to scientifically prove that it is indeed his sample, not
a "donor".
The lab said that the test is foolproof, a test equipment manufacturer said
that there is an margin of error and my common sense says that nobody, or
test is foolproof. Damm, he has a hell of a high legal mountain to conquer.
This whole thing does not make sense. Wait, didn't David Byrne write a song
about this?
Steve