Please ignore this post

[Gds]

Like I said, please feel free to ignore this post as it's
for my own curiosity. I just want to see the amount of spam
(if any) the supplied email addy generates.

Sorry for taking up your time.

G.

gdstestingnews at yahoo dot com dot au

 

[Kingsley]

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:59:29 +0930, GDS wrote:

> Like I said, please feel free to ignore this post as it's
> for my own curiosity. I just want to see the amount of
> spam (if any) the supplied email addy generates.

You'll get bugger-all posting in that manner, probably none.
The bulk of the address harvesting comes from the headers to
the article, particularly the Reply-To: field.

-kt

--
Kingsley Turner, (mailto: [email protected])
http://MadDogsBreakfast.com/ABFAQ - news:aus.bicycle
Frequenly Asked Questions

 

[Drs]

"GDS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Like I said, please feel free to ignore this post as it's
> for my own curiosity. I just want to see the amount of
> spam (if any) the supplied email addy generates.
>
> Sorry for taking up your time.

There are test groups for testing. Use alt.test next time.

--

A: Top-posters.
B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[><\(\(\(\(º>]

I really don't understand all this "Top Poster" "Bottom
Poster" argument.

How is it better to have no choice but to scroll through
comments you've already read ?

Click on message, scroll, scroll, scroll.

Seems completely illogical to me.

*Top posting because it's logical*

--
Tony

[email protected]

Remove the fish to reply --= This is a fish anti-spam
device =--

`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º> "DRS" <[email protected]>
wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> "GDS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Like I said, please feel free to ignore this post as
> > it's for my own curiosity. I just want to see the amount
> > of spam (if any) the supplied email addy generates.
> >
> > Sorry for taking up your time.
>
> There are test groups for testing. Use alt.test next time.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[Drs]

"><((((º>" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> I really don't understand all this "Top Poster" "Bottom
> Poster" argument.

Like you don't already know, troll.

Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html

Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html

http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_stv0.htm

http://www.fscked.co.uk/writing/top-posting-cuss.html

--

A: Top-posters.
B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[><\(\(\(\(º>]

Thanks for the links DRS.

Interesting claims people are making about Top and Bottom
posting there. Most of which seem illogical to me though
unfortunately.

I prefer to top post because it is more logical to me, and
it is easier to read.

I've been online for over twelve years now, and bottom
posting has always given me the *****. I just skip a message
altogether if someone quotes 3 pages of text before trying
to add a single sentence at the bottom.

Thanks again for the links, I'll book mark those.

Ps. I'm not a Troll. You made the point of using a bait in
your signature that some people would nibble on. So by
definition your the Troll here since you were the one
baiting people, not I.

--
Tony

[email protected]

Remove the fish to reply --= This is a fish anti-spam
device =--

`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º> "DRS" <[email protected]>
wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> "><((((º>" <[email protected]> wrote in
> message news:[email protected]
> > I really don't understand all this "Top Poster" "Bottom
> > Poster" argument.
>
> Like you don't already know, troll.
>
> Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html
>
> Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
> http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
>
> http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_stv0.htm
>
> http://www.fscked.co.uk/writing/top-posting-cuss.html
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[Drs]

"><((((º>" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Thanks for the links DRS.
>
> Interesting claims people are making about Top and Bottom
> posting there. Most of which seem illogical to me though
> unfortunately.
>
> I prefer to top post because it is more logical to me, and
> it is easier to read.

It is not logical to put the answer before the question.
When you top-post you impose on others by forcing them to
reorder the material so it makes sense. That's called
selfishness.

> I've been online for over twelve years now, and bottom
> posting has always given me the *****. I just skip a
> message altogether if someone quotes 3 pages of text
> before trying to add a single sentence at the bottom.

You are confusing two different issues. Not snipping
extraneous quoted material is also wrong but it does not
justify top-posting.

> Thanks again for the links, I'll book mark those.
>
> Ps. I'm not a Troll. You made the point of using a bait in
> your signature that some people would nibble on. So by
> definition your the Troll here since you were the one
> baiting people, not I.

It's not bait.

--

A: Top-posters.
B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[John L]

Tony,

Iv'e also been posting to newsgroups for over fourteen years
& DRS is the only person ever to complain to me about top
posting. Yes he is a troll & I also believe top posting
makes more sense. I must admit to baiting this poor anally
fixated soul, but I can't help it, he is so easy.

I have a mental picture of him riding in a peleton on his
tricycle with a 50cc motor attached, with a megaphone,
ordering other riders to stay in line, don't draft too
close, don't use your elbows, then someone giving him a big
boot into the nearest ditch, leaving him lying there crying
out 'BUT WHY"

John L.

Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:41:48 +1000, "><\(\(\(\(º>"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Thanks for the links DRS.
>
>Interesting claims people are making about Top and Bottom
>posting there. Most of which seem illogical to me though
>unfortunately.
>
>I prefer to top post because it is more logical to me, and
>it is easier to read.
>
>I've been online for over twelve years now, and bottom
>posting has always given me the *****. I just skip a
>message altogether if someone quotes 3 pages of text before
>trying to add a single sentence at the bottom.
>
>Thanks again for the links, I'll book mark those.
>
>Ps. I'm not a Troll. You made the point of using a bait in
> your signature that some people would nibble on. So by
> definition your the Troll here since you were the one
> baiting people, not I.

 

[Drs]

"John L" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Tony,
>
> Iv'e also been posting to newsgroups for over fourteen
> years & DRS is the only person ever to complain to me
> about top posting.

I don't believe you.

> Yes he is a troll

For someone who claims to have been around Usenet so long
you don't know what a troll is, because I contribute far too
much and have for far too long to ever be considered one.

> & I also believe top posting makes more sense.

But you're just stupid. Putting the answer before the
question is always stupid.

> I must admit to baiting this poor anally fixated soul, but
> I can't help it, he is so easy.

And what does that say about you?

> I have a mental picture of him riding in a peleton on his
> tricycle with a 50cc motor attached, with a megaphone,
> ordering other riders to stay in line, don't draft too
> close, don't use your elbows, then someone giving him a
> big boot into the nearest ditch, leaving him lying there
> crying out 'BUT WHY"

You should get a mind before trying mental pictures of
anything.

--

A: Top-posters.
B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[John L]

D R Sole, your replies are getting more pathetic by the minute

You sounf like a small child screaming :"and so are you".

Can't you be a little more creative with your responses, or
are you already working to the upper limits of you
vocabulary & IQ.

John L.

Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:35:44 +1000, "DRS"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"John L" <[email protected]> wrote
>in message news:[email protected]
>> Tony,
>>
>> Iv'e also been posting to newsgroups for over fourteen
>> years & DRS is the only person ever to complain to me
>> about top posting.
>
>I don't believe you.
>
>> Yes he is a troll
>
>For someone who claims to have been around Usenet so
>long you don't know what a troll is, because I
>contribute far too much and have for far too long to
>ever be considered one.
>
>> & I also believe top posting makes more sense.
>
>But you're just stupid. Putting the answer before the
>question is always stupid.
>
>> I must admit to baiting this poor anally fixated soul,
>> but I can't help it, he is so easy.
>
>And what does that say about you?
>
>> I have a mental picture of him riding in a peleton on his
>> tricycle with a 50cc motor attached, with a megaphone,
>> ordering other riders to stay in line, don't draft too
>> close, don't use your elbows, then someone giving him a
>> big boot into the nearest ditch, leaving him lying there
>> crying out 'BUT WHY"
>
>You should get a mind before trying mental pictures of
>anything.

 

[Drs]

"John L" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> D R Sole, your replies are getting more pathetic by the
> minute
>
> You sounf like a small child screaming :"and so are you".
>
> Can't you be a little more creative with your responses,
> or are you already working to the upper limits of you
> vocabulary & IQ.

I'm keeping it as simple as I can so you can understand what
I'm saying. If it's pathetic it's only because I've had to
stoop to your level.

--

A: Top-posters.
B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[John L]

That's much better, you're almost making sense. Keep the medication
up, you may get better really soon

Don't give up on the crusade, you may convert one person,
one day. Also work hard to retain your sparkling sense of
humour, you would be a killer at standup..

Bye now.

John L.

Q. What's the most annoying thing on usenet.

R. Anal retentive, verbally challenged, trolling bottom
posters who want the world to conform..

On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:46:50 +1000, "DRS"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"John L" <[email protected]> wrote
>in message news:[email protected]
>> D R Sole, your replies are getting more pathetic by the
>> minute
>>
>> You sounf like a small child screaming :"and so are you".
>>
>> Can't you be a little more creative with your responses,
>> or are you already working to the upper limits of you
>> vocabulary & IQ.
>
>I'm keeping it as simple as I can so you can understand
>what I'm saying. If it's pathetic it's only because I've
>had to stoop to your level.

 

[Kingsley]

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:22:03 +1000, ><((((º> wrote:

> I really don't understand all this "Top Poster" "Bottom
> Poster" argument.
>
> How is it better to have no choice but to scroll through
> comments you've already read ?

The idea is to trim the previous article(s) such that the
points you are replying to are the only bits contained in
the followup.

This should constrain the bits you have to scroll/read
through to a reasonable minimum. Usenet is a store-and-
forward medium, and you rarely get a perfect copy of the
news database out to all the leaf servers (the server I'm
using is a perfect example).

Quoting the *relevant* parts of the previous post preserves
the 'thread' of the conversation.

-kt

--
Kingsley Turner, (mailto: [email protected])
http://MadDogsBreakfast.com/ABFAQ - news:aus.bicycle
Frequenly Asked Questions

 

[Drs]

"John L" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> That's much better, you're almost making sense. Keep the
> medication up, you may get better really soon

Now you're insulting all the readership who are in fact on
medications.

> Don't give up on the crusade, you may convert one person,
> one day.

All rational people agree that the answer always comes after
the question. Fools like you can never be persuaded because
you are immune to reason.

--

A: Top-posters.
B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[Bcl]

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:22:03 +1000, "><\(\(\(\(º>"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I really don't understand all this "Top Poster" "Bottom
>Poster" argument.
>
I agree it is totally illogical. In the (large) company I
work for everybody top posts probably because that is the
way Mr Gates designed his software. However it is never a
problem if you are not aware of the context then you
scroll down.

Personally I don't top post on the internet because I don't
use micro$oft software (unless I have to) and I ran a BBS
for 10 years before the Internet became popular and old
habits die hard - however it is just that a habit

Regards Bruce

http://www.bcl.id.au

 

[Drs]

"BCL" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:22:03 +1000, "><\(\(\(\(º>"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I really don't understand all this "Top Poster" "Bottom
>> Poster" argument.
>>
> I agree it is totally illogical. In the (large) company I
> work for everybody top posts probably because that is the
> way Mr Gates designed his software. However it is never a
> problem if you are not aware of the context then you
> scroll down.

Microsoft's refusal to honour standards when it suits them
is well known. In any event, it only takes a mouse click to
move the cursor to the bottom. If you want it done
automatically download http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-
quotefix/.

> Personally I don't top post on the internet because I
> don't use micro$oft software (unless I have to) and I ran
> a BBS for 10 years before the Internet became popular and
> old habits die hard - however it is just that a habit

--

"Posting at the top because that's where the cursor happened
to be is like shitting in your pants because that's where
your asshole happened to be." Andreas Prilop

 

[flyingdutch]

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

 

[Bg]

bla bla bla

"flyingdutch" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:[email protected]...
> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-
> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-
> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-
> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-
> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-
> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
>
>
>
> --

 

[flyingdutch]

exactly

 

[ritcho]

Originally posted by flyingdutch
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

Look, I'm as tolerant as the next person, especially when it comes to such an experienced poster. However I seriously object to the omission of hyphens when words spill over to the next line. This is a serious breach of Usenet netiquette as well as an important indicator of the decline of the quality of English education in this country!

Ritch.

PS. Your only excuse is if you have been infected by the CokeSpill virus - see http://www.satirewire.com/briefs/cokespill.shtml