Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Pros prefer sewups

Started by Mike Krueger · · Last activity · 70 posts · 2,808 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 May 2004
Last activity
2 June 2004
Original author
Mike Krueger
Posts
70
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,808
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–70 of 70
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. David L. Johnson said:
    Antti Salonen said:
    Quoted message said:

    Did I miss where you addressed the weight argument
    against clinchers? Aren't tubulars significantly lighter?

    Depends on what you think is "significant", I guess. A
    reasonable clincher tyre for every-day use is about 300
    grams including the inner tube.

    A race tire/tube might be lighter, but say 250 and you get
    all but the very lightest around.

    Quoted message said:

    A comparable tubular tyre might be lighter than that, but
    not by much.

    You can get about 30-50 grams lighter at the same level of
    durability. But at these weights neither the clincher nor
    the tubie would be all that durable.

    Quoted message said:

    The tubular rim is also lighter, but the weight different
    is something like 20 grams per rim.

    Well, rim weight can be more significant than that. We
    used to use rims that were on the order of 200-250g, some
    even under 200g. Clinchers just can't be that light. Maybe
    as much as 100g difference per wheel. Also, modern rear
    wheels, with the extreme dish, need a heavier rim, so you
    would not save that much in the rear.

    All told, you could approach 150-200g lighter using
    tubulars. As to whether or not that is significant, it
    obviously depends on what your team is willing to put out
    for you. If you are not with a team, I don't see the point
    of the discussion, since the economics alone clearly favor
    clinchers, not to mention the hassle factors.

    The UCI sets the minimum bicycle mass at 6.8 kg, so if that
    figure can be reached through weight savings elsewhere, the
    heavier clincher rim/tire combination would not be a
    disadvantage to a professional racer.

    --
    Tom Sherman – Quad City Area

  2. "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    And pro racers generally have full mechanical support.
    When was the last time you saw a pro fixing a flat or
    changing a tire in the middle of a race? The support car
    comes to their aid with a whole new wheel, and away they
    go. So for all we know, their tires could be glued on
    permanently with 3M 5200 or something.

    If I remember correctly, the world famous bicycle designer
    Mike Burrows writes in his book "Bicycle Design: Towards the
    Perfect Machine" that the only sensible reason to use
    tubulars is in TTs, where a quick tyre change could "keep
    you in the money" - there being a small financial reward for
    a placing. I believe support vehicles are uncommon in
    British TTs.

    I can't possibly believe tubulars are such a bad idea.
    Wasn't the Paris-Roubaix won on them again this year? That's
    a race where the pros ride all sorts of non-standard
    equipment, from cross-bikes to front suspension, special
    wheels etc. Time and again many choose tubulars.

    We are all going to be riding tubless clinchers soon
    anyway.....

    LGF

  3. Terry Morse said:

    Plugging in a few reasonable numbers (5000 watts, 280 g
    rim) produces a rim temperature rise of about 20 C/second.
    Ignoring cooling, it would take less than 4 seconds to
    raise the rim temperature to 100C, presumably well above
    the glue melting temperature.

    Nice analysis. I don't know anything about tubular
    glues, but many adhesives melt at temperatures well
    above 100C. So to pick a nit, I think it would take a
    bit more than 4 seconds.

    --
    Dave dvt at psu dot edu

  4. "dvt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Terry Morse said:

    Plugging in a few reasonable numbers (5000 watts, 280 g
    rim) produces a rim temperature rise of about 20
    C/second. Ignoring cooling, it would take less than 4
    seconds to raise the rim temperature to 100C, presumably
    well above the glue melting temperature.

    Nice analysis. I don't know anything about tubular glues,
    but many adhesives melt at temperatures well above 100C.
    So to pick a nit, I think it would take a bit more than 4
    seconds.

    You don't need the glue to melt, ie convert to a liquid, for
    there to be a problem.

    You only need it to soften enough to creep. That can be a
    long way before the melting temperature is reached.

    Nitpicks need to be nitpick proof themselves, otherwise they
    make one look like a nit.
    --
    Mark South Citizen of the World, Denizen of the Net <<Tiens!
    Ce poulet a une grenade!

  5. LGF said:

    We are all going to be riding tubless clinchers soon
    anyway.....

    I thought we were going to be riding "Tubiesto clinchers."

    -a

    --
    Alan Hoyle - [email hidden] - alanhoyle.comalanhoyle.com
    "I don't want the world, I just want your half." -TMBG
    Get Horizontal, Play Ultimate.

  6. LGF said:

    I can't possibly believe tubulars are such a bad idea.
    Wasn't the Paris-Roubaix won on them again this year?
    That's a race where the pros ride all sorts of non-
    standard equipment, from cross-bikes to front suspension,
    special wheels etc. Time and again many choose tubulars.

    They choose wacky dietary supplements, astrology, and weird
    pre-race rituals too.

    Quoted message said:

    We are all going to be riding tubless clinchers soon
    anyway.....

    Speak for yourself!

    Matt O.

  7. Shayne Wissler said:

    Aren't tubulars significantly lighter?

    Many tubular rims are lighter than similar clincher rims,
    and in the past this was almost universally true.

    But I've recently heard that Ksyriums, for example, have
    clincher and tubular rims of the same weight. The tubs
    apparently have extra metal in the edges for denting
    resistance. Can anyone measure this?

  8. Ted B said:

    That isn't suprising being 'neutral support' (i.e.
    emergency situation), just as neutral support provides
    water bottles filled with *water only*.

    No champagne then? I bet Anquetil was well annoyed if he
    ever had to use neutral service ;-)

  9. I don't see a conflict with your RR data and preferring
    tubies; because it seems that tubies can be pumped up to a
    far ( an additional 20-40 lbs?) higher tire pressure than
    clinchers while maintaining the same comfort, therefore
    _more_ than overcoming the glue factor.

    Gosh, a clincher at 130-140- now THAT's real punishment!

  10. "remove the polite word to reply" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't see a conflict with your RR data and preferring
    tubies; because it seems that tubies can be pumped up to a
    far ( an additional


    20-40 lbs?)

    Quoted message said:

    higher tire pressure than clinchers while maintaining
    the same comfort, therefore _more_ than overcoming the
    glue factor.

    What is your source?

    Quoted message said:


    Gosh, a clincher at 130-140- now THAT's real punishment!

    Actually the comfort benefit is derived from the ability to
    run *lower* pressures without risk of pinch flats. Running
    95 psi is not uncommon with sewups for long continental pro
    races. I have no idea where this trend of running super high
    pressure came from except perhaps people have been over-
    reacting when they got an occasional pinch flat on their
    clinchers tires.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.