A few days ago, George W Bush took a swipe at Vladimir Putin whom he accuses of undermining freedom and democracy in the Russian Federation.
What Bush was referring to more than anything else was oil. Basically Putin took the decision to assert Kremlin control over Russian oil reserves. Essentially this means that U.S. companies have been squeezed out of the Russian oil market somewhat since it's now Rosneft that controls most of the oil (and Rosneft itself is under Krelmlin control). What Putin seeks to do is exploit Russian natural resources and supply China with oil in the future in order to boost Russia's struggling economy. He figures that Russian production and industry is still too far behind the West and China to drive the overall economy so oil and gas remain the best means of catching up with Europe and the U.S.A.
All this amounts to is really nationalisation of resources and more control over the free market. Bush obviously doesn't like what's happening in Russia one iota but it's incredible how he claims to be concerned over issues of human rights in Russia now oil has become a factor. Funny how nothing was said about the oligarchs under Yeltsin when the latter also attempted to control the press and media. So long as Yeltsin deal with western companies, he could do as he liked with regard to democracy.
The truth is Putin's policies have been designed to prevent foreign companies exploiting certain weaknesses within Russia's fledgling market economy and may also be seen as retribution for Bush's and Europe's meddling in the Ukraine (Russia and Ukraine have been historically linked for centuries and Krushchev himself was Ukranian, not Russian).
As for Bush's claim that Russia is abandoning democracy, this is an exaggeration. Even though Putin has tried to muffle any criticism of his policies in the Russian press and media, he can't realistically control the free internet within the country and Russians still have, more or less, the same rights as Europeans. The idea that Russia would drift back into Stalinism is ridiculous since modern Russia has very little in common with the days when dissidents were sent to labour camps, people couldn't travel or own private property.
Yes, of course, it's true there are significant problems concerning freedom of political expression and the free market in Moscow but, in the long run, Putin is probably right to protect his own less competitive companies from foreign competition and bloodsuckers who would fill foreign bank accounts with the money from Russian oil revenues (at the expense of many impoverished Russians)
What Bush was referring to more than anything else was oil. Basically Putin took the decision to assert Kremlin control over Russian oil reserves. Essentially this means that U.S. companies have been squeezed out of the Russian oil market somewhat since it's now Rosneft that controls most of the oil (and Rosneft itself is under Krelmlin control). What Putin seeks to do is exploit Russian natural resources and supply China with oil in the future in order to boost Russia's struggling economy. He figures that Russian production and industry is still too far behind the West and China to drive the overall economy so oil and gas remain the best means of catching up with Europe and the U.S.A.
All this amounts to is really nationalisation of resources and more control over the free market. Bush obviously doesn't like what's happening in Russia one iota but it's incredible how he claims to be concerned over issues of human rights in Russia now oil has become a factor. Funny how nothing was said about the oligarchs under Yeltsin when the latter also attempted to control the press and media. So long as Yeltsin deal with western companies, he could do as he liked with regard to democracy.
The truth is Putin's policies have been designed to prevent foreign companies exploiting certain weaknesses within Russia's fledgling market economy and may also be seen as retribution for Bush's and Europe's meddling in the Ukraine (Russia and Ukraine have been historically linked for centuries and Krushchev himself was Ukranian, not Russian).
As for Bush's claim that Russia is abandoning democracy, this is an exaggeration. Even though Putin has tried to muffle any criticism of his policies in the Russian press and media, he can't realistically control the free internet within the country and Russians still have, more or less, the same rights as Europeans. The idea that Russia would drift back into Stalinism is ridiculous since modern Russia has very little in common with the days when dissidents were sent to labour camps, people couldn't travel or own private property.
Yes, of course, it's true there are significant problems concerning freedom of political expression and the free market in Moscow but, in the long run, Putin is probably right to protect his own less competitive companies from foreign competition and bloodsuckers who would fill foreign bank accounts with the money from Russian oil revenues (at the expense of many impoverished Russians)