Re: RR: The return of the singlespeed



M

MattB

Guest
Corvus Corvax wrote:
> The singlespeed is back.

<snip>
> Later inspectin reveals that it wasn't the freewheel that failed: I had
> threaded it on the hub wrong, and it had stripped the threads in one
> big zip. No more flip-flop. The Surly hub is now one-sided as well as
> one-speeded. But I only need one.
>
> CC
>


Excellent. I'm missing my SS lately as it's also on the disabled list at
the moment. The BB, freewheel, and rear hub are toast (also a problem
with threads). I have a new hub coming from Paul (not a free
replacement, but they hooked me up).

While I'm at it I'm replacing the LX V's on it with my old XTRs from
when I got discs on the epic.

Soon we will be rolling together again, suffering sweetly in the sage.

Matt
 
"MattB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Corvus Corvax wrote:
>> The singlespeed is back.

> <snip>
>> Later inspectin reveals that it wasn't the freewheel that failed: I had
>> threaded it on the hub wrong, and it had stripped the threads in one
>> big zip. No more flip-flop. The Surly hub is now one-sided as well as
>> one-speeded. But I only need one. CC
>>

>
> Excellent. I'm missing my SS lately as it's also on the disabled list at
> the moment. The BB, freewheel, and rear hub are toast (also a problem with
> threads). I have a new hub coming from Paul (not a free replacement, but
> they hooked me up).
>
> While I'm at it I'm replacing the LX V's on it with my old XTRs from when
> I got discs on the epic.
>
> Soon we will be rolling together again, suffering sweetly in the sage.
>
> Matt


what? a maintenance issue? on an SS....How the hell can I believe this,
considering all the talk about them being lower maintenance....


I call ********!
 
Dave W wrote:
<snip>
>
>
> what? a maintenance issue? on an SS....How the hell can I believe this,
> considering all the talk about them being lower maintenance....
>
>
> I call ********!
>
>


Lower <> None
I know it's hard, but try to read it a few times and visualize it.
If it helps, it's ok to move your lips while you do so.

I'm the third owner of this bike. I think it's done pretty well.

Matt
 
"MattB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dave W wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>>
>> what? a maintenance issue? on an SS....How the hell can I believe this,
>> considering all the talk about them being lower maintenance....
>>
>>
>> I call ********!

>
> Lower <> None
> I know it's hard, but try to read it a few times and visualize it.
> If it helps, it's ok to move your lips while you do so.


Whatever. It's down, And we all know downtime without a bike just sux.
Luckily you have others huh?
>
> I'm the third owner of this bike. I think it's done pretty well.


Fantastic. It's still broke....
>
> Matt
 
Dave W wrote:
> "MattB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Dave W wrote:
>><snip>
>>
>>>
>>>what? a maintenance issue? on an SS....How the hell can I believe this,
>>>considering all the talk about them being lower maintenance....
>>>
>>>
>>>I call ********!

>>
>>Lower <> None
>>I know it's hard, but try to read it a few times and visualize it.
>>If it helps, it's ok to move your lips while you do so.

>
>
> Whatever. It's down, And we all know downtime without a bike just sux.
> Luckily you have others huh?
>



Yes, I'm just making do with the Epic for now. I just like the SS for a
quick grueling workout when I'm pressed for time (which is often). It's
also extremely quiet compared to most geared bikes. If the Epic broke
too I could always ride the <shudder> road bike. It's good to have
backups for anything mechanical. Things wear out.

>>I'm the third owner of this bike. I think it's done pretty well.

>
>
> Fantastic. It's still broke....
>


Brilliant!

Oh, and this is the first significant down-time for this bike in the two
years I've had it. For a used bike that seems pretty good to me, but
maybe I'm just blindly optimistic. Either way I'm still generally happy
(although getting antsy to ride it).

Matt
 
"MattB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dave W wrote:
>> "MattB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>Dave W wrote:
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>what? a maintenance issue? on an SS....How the hell can I believe this,
>>>>considering all the talk about them being lower maintenance....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I call ********!
>>>
>>>Lower <> None
>>>I know it's hard, but try to read it a few times and visualize it.
>>>If it helps, it's ok to move your lips while you do so.

>>
>>
>> Whatever. It's down, And we all know downtime without a bike just sux.
>> Luckily you have others huh?
>>

>
>
> Yes, I'm just making do with the Epic for now. I just like the SS for a
> quick grueling workout when I'm pressed for time (which is often).


That's a cool reason to want one. But, can't the same grueling be achieved
w/ a geared bike. An it you'd like more grueling, just keep it in one gear.

To me, a geared bike gives a wider array of "grueling" to chose from.


> It's also extremely quiet compared to most geared bikes.


You have just struck the "only" reason I would even consider one. I
definetly like the idea of slipping through the trails almost silent...but I
don't think the local wildlife (ie hikers) will appreciate the fact that I
could be right up on them before I was heard....



>If the Epic broke too I could always ride the <shudder> road bike.


Blaspheme!!


> It's good to have backups for anything mechanical. Things wear out.


Tis true. Why else would there be Viagra?

>
>>>I'm the third owner of this bike. I think it's done pretty well.

>>
>>
>> Fantastic. It's still broke....
>>

>
> Brilliant!
>
> Oh, and this is the first significant down-time for this bike in the two
> years I've had it. For a used bike that seems pretty good to me,


Damn good. My geared bike has lasted a good while as well. I just don't get
to ride some of the awesome spots you left coasters get to....

> but maybe I'm just blindly optimistic.


Tis better than being blindly pessimistic, I s'pose.


> Either way I'm still generally happy (although getting antsy to ride it).
>
> Matt


Well then, get that bad boy back up, and on the hill!!!
 
Dave W wrote:
> "MattB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Dave W wrote:
>>
>>>"MattB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...

<snip>
>>
>>Yes, I'm just making do with the Epic for now. I just like the SS for a
>>quick grueling workout when I'm pressed for time (which is often).

>
>
> That's a cool reason to want one. But, can't the same grueling be achieved
> w/ a geared bike. An it you'd like more grueling, just keep it in one gear.
>
> To me, a geared bike gives a wider array of "grueling" to chose from.
>


You'd think so, but it's not the same. There's a threshold where I'd be
sure there was no way I could continue on, yet on the SS I have only two
choices. Stop or continue on despite the pain. I always try to continue
on (which may or may not work).
On the geared bike you have the additional option of shifting. As hard
as I may try to pretend I don't have that option, I know it's really
there and that changes the dynamics of the ride. When faced with the
choice of dismounting or shifting, I'll take shifting. Not having that
option just makes me push a little harder.
The grind is good, and the spin is good. I never grind or spin as much
on the geared bike as I do on the SS.

>
>
>>It's also extremely quiet compared to most geared bikes.

>
>
> You have just struck the "only" reason I would even consider one. I
> definetly like the idea of slipping through the trails almost silent...but I
> don't think the local wildlife (ie hikers) will appreciate the fact that I
> could be right up on them before I was heard....
>
>


I'm not trying to sell you on an SS. I'm just saying why I like it when
you seem to be on an anti-SS mission. You're very quick to have an
"Ah-ha!" moment, like you've discovered the man behind the curtain
really isn't the all-powerful Oz. Chill out a little.

I forgot to mention the efficiency of the drivetrain is also very
empowering. That's another thing you don't get on a geared bike. The SS
(when not all trashed like mine was) is amazingly efficient and you can
really fell that. Especially when going back to a derailer setup afterwards.

>
>
>>If the Epic broke too I could always ride the <shudder> road bike.

>
>
> Blaspheme!!
>


I do what I have to. I haver no religious affiliation. I prefer dirt but
I'll take the road over the couch any (or at least most) day(s).

>
>
>>It's good to have backups for anything mechanical. Things wear out.

>
>
> Tis true. Why else would there be Viagra?
>


I wouldn't know.

>
>>>>I'm the third owner of this bike. I think it's done pretty well.
>>>
>>>
>>>Fantastic. It's still broke....
>>>

>>
>>Brilliant!
>>
>>Oh, and this is the first significant down-time for this bike in the two
>>years I've had it. For a used bike that seems pretty good to me,

>
>
> Damn good. My geared bike has lasted a good while as well. I just don't get
> to ride some of the awesome spots you left coasters get to....
>


No coast here (besides the occasional lake or reservoir). I'm in the
middle. It still rules for mountain biking.

>
>>but maybe I'm just blindly optimistic.

>
>
> Tis better than being blindly pessimistic, I s'pose.
>
>
>
>>Either way I'm still generally happy (although getting antsy to ride it).
>>
>>Matt

>
>
> Well then, get that bad boy back up, and on the hill!!!
>
>


That's the plan. This "conversation" has grown tiresome. Let's put it to
rest.

Matt (shiny new Paul Word hub came in yesterday)
 
MattB wrote:
> Matt (shiny new Paul Word hub came in yesterday)



A fine hub, indeed.

Ever get that feeling you were talking to a brick wall that has only
one brick?

JD
 
JD wrote:
>
> MattB wrote:
>
>>Matt (shiny new Paul Word hub came in yesterday)

>
>
>
> A fine hub, indeed.
>
> Ever get that feeling you were talking to a brick wall that has only
> one brick?
>
> JD
>


All the time. You do remember I do tech support, right?
:)

Matt (tired for the 32 Miler at Hartman's yesterday)
 
"JD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> MattB wrote:
>> Matt (shiny new Paul Word hub came in yesterday)

>
>
> A fine hub, indeed.
>
> Ever get that feeling you were talking to a brick wall that has only
> one brick?
>
> JD


how stupid would that make you? talking to a one brick wall....do you always
talk to in-animate objects?

seems you have a grey matter deficency...
>
 
MattB wrote:
> JD wrote:
> >
> > MattB wrote:
> >
> >>Matt (shiny new Paul Word hub came in yesterday)

> >
> >
> >
> > A fine hub, indeed.
> >
> > Ever get that feeling you were talking to a brick wall that has only
> > one brick?
> >
> > JD
> >

>
> All the time. You do remember I do tech support, right?
> :)
>
> Matt (tired for the 32 Miler at Hartman's yesterday)



Yeah, we both have that affliction in our chosen professions.

I'm not tired today from about 21 SS miles in the mountains with Bill
Porter and friends yesterday, but I sure was feeling it on the last
climb of the day. Just to shake any cobwebs today, I'm going to head
to the dirt in a few.

JD
 
"JD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>>
>> All the time. You do remember I do tech support, right?
>> :)
>>
>> Matt (tired for the 32 Miler at Hartman's yesterday)

>
>
> Yeah, we both have that affliction in our chosen professions.
>


A lot of people do....try something in the transportation industry
sometime....scary!