General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Reliable (referenced?) GI values

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 31 posts · 462 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
21 October 2007
Last activity
24 October 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
462
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi all,

    I am considering going on the low GI diet. I went on the Atkins a few
    years ago and I found it useful, but I have decided it may be too
    unhealthy. I want to find reliable figures for GI values of foods.
    Have found this [1] database, from the university of Sydney but it
    gives very varied results [2] and no references. I have a book [3]
    but it is completely unreferenced, does not give values and has some
    odd choices for the red, yellow and green columns [4].

    Does anyone have any sujestions for good sources of GI values of
    foods? It is important to me that it is usable, but more important is
    trustable. If it had references that would make trustable, but any
    suggestions would be great. I belive I have a reasnoble idea of the
    science of nutrition from a biological degree and further reading over
    some years.

    [1] http://www.glycemicindex.com/
    [2]
    Potato, Russet Burbank, baked without fat (Canada) 56
    Potato, Russet Burbank, baked without fat (USA) 111
    [3] the Gi DIET Rick Gallop 0-7535-0775-7
    [4] hard margarine, vegetable fat in red, rapeseed and olive oil in
    green (other than the omega 3/6 levels which have little to do with
    wieght loss, these are almost identical nutrionally).
    Broad beans in red, boiled new potatoes in green.
    Grapes, which are far higher than other fruits in free sugars are in
    green.
    Ravioli and tortellini are in red, most other pastas are in green.
    When I make these things, pretty much the exact same ingedients go
    into them, and they are cooked for a similar time so why should the
    fact the the sauce is inside the pasta make any difference.

    Thanks for any help,

    Hugh

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    I am considering going on the low GI diet. I went on the Atkins a few
    years ago and I found it useful, but I have decided it may be too
    unhealthy.

    You're an idiot.

    Go remove yourself from the gene pool.

    HTH

  3. jcderkoeing said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    Quoted message said:

    I am considering going on the low GI diet. I went on the Atkins a few
    years ago and I found it useful, but I have decided it may be too
    unhealthy.

    You're an idiot.

    Go remove yourself from the gene pool.

    HTH

    Why? I am aware of the advantages of the attkins, and I am sure that
    for many people the weight loss on the atkins would significantly
    increase their life expectancy. But to deny that there is any risk is
    dishonest. I worried most about the ketosis. I found it impostble to
    go a long working day without getting ketotic. The risks of long term
    ketosis are significant, in particular eye damage and vasculitis. I
    blame the ketosis for softening my teeth, as I broke a tooth on a pork
    scratching that I am sure would not have been a problem prior to
    goiing on the atkins.

    Of course I could be wrong, but I do not belive that considering the
    risk is idiotic.

  4. Quoted message said:
    jcderkoeing said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    Quoted message said:

    I am considering going on the low GI diet. I went on the Atkins a few
    years ago and I found it useful, but I have decided it may be too
    unhealthy.

    You're an idiot.

    Go remove yourself from the gene pool.

    HTH

    Why? I am aware of the advantages of the attkins, and I am sure that
    for many people the weight loss on the atkins would significantly
    increase their life expectancy. But to deny that there is any risk is
    dishonest. I worried most about the ketosis. I found it impostble to
    go a long working day without getting ketotic. The risks of long term
    ketosis are significant, in particular eye damage and vasculitis. I
    blame the ketosis for softening my teeth, as I broke a tooth on a pork
    scratching that I am sure would not have been a problem prior to
    goiing on the atkins.

    Of course I could be wrong, but I do not belive that considering the
    risk is idiotic.

    Well, some of the things that you have mentioned have already been covered.

    There is no absolute necessity for carbohydrates to be in the diet
    according to the Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of
    Sciences, Washington DC.

    They also cite examples of cultures that managed to be healthy on
    virtually no carbohydrates, or very little carbohydrates.

    http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10490&page=275

    The long term risks of ketosis are UNKNOWN from scientific studies, not
    SIGNIFICANT.

    A telling story is the belief you have of the softening of your teeth
    from ketosis.

    Lemon juice and coca cola are two liquids known to soften dental enamel.
    There are consumer reports that some of the whitening agents for teeth
    also soften enamel.

    The connections between ordinary diet KETOSIS (not DIABETIC
    KETOACIDOSIS) and other diseases fail to crop up on short searches on
    Google. Diabetic ketoacidosis (with diabetes) certainly has known
    effects on the eye and general risks for several other organs.

    Please post any links you have to evidence for *dietary* *ketosis*
    causing the organ damage to which you refer.

    Should you be correct, it would be something for low carb dieters to
    address.

  5. Jim said:

    Well, some of the things that you have mentioned have already been covered.

    There is no absolute necessity for carbohydrates to be in the diet
    according to the Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of
    Sciences, Washington DC.

    They also cite examples of cultures that managed to be healthy on
    virtually no carbohydrates, or very little carbohydrates.

    http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10490&page=275

    It is a proven fact that people can survive for long periods of time
    (decades) without carbohydrates. I am saying that I was unable to
    while working an 8+ hour day in an office.

    Quoted message said:

    The long term risks of ketosis are UNKNOWN from scientific studies, not
    SIGNIFICANT.

    A telling story is the belief you have of the softening of your teeth
    from ketosis.

    Lemon juice and coca cola are two liquids known to soften dental enamel.
    There are consumer reports that some of the whitening agents for teeth
    also soften enamel.

    I am not sure how this is relavent.

    Quoted message said:

    The connections between ordinary diet KETOSIS (not DIABETIC
    KETOACIDOSIS) and other diseases fail to crop up on short searches on
    Google. Diabetic ketoacidosis (with diabetes) certainly has known
    effects on the eye and general risks for several other organs.

    Please post any links you have to evidence for *dietary* *ketosis*
    causing the organ damage to which you refer.

    My experience is on the animal rather than human side. It is well
    known that acute dietry ketosis can be fatal, and is known as Twin
    Lamb Disease [1] in sheep. It is obviouly a very different case to
    cronic ketosis in a low carb diet. I shall try and find something
    more relavent, but the fact that some forms of ketosis are damaging
    surely means it is not totally stupid to cosider the risk of inducing
    another form.

    As I say, I sure the atkins is very good for many people, I have just
    choosen not to go down that road at this time. If the GI diet is not
    low carb enough for the question to be OT in this forum then fair
    enough, but to call me an idiot and suggest rather dramatic measures
    seems a bit over the top.

    [1] http://www.pipevet.com/articles/Pregnancy%20Ketosis.htm

  6. Quoted message said:
    Jim said:

    Well, some of the things that you have mentioned have already been covered.

    There is no absolute necessity for carbohydrates to be in the diet
    according to the Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of
    Sciences, Washington DC.

    They also cite examples of cultures that managed to be healthy on
    virtually no carbohydrates, or very little carbohydrates.

    http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10490&page=275

    It is a proven fact that people can survive for long periods of time
    (decades) without carbohydrates. I am saying that I was unable to
    while working an 8+ hour day in an office.

    Quoted message said:

    The long term risks of ketosis are UNKNOWN from scientific studies, not
    SIGNIFICANT.

    A telling story is the belief you have of the softening of your teeth
    from ketosis.

    Lemon juice and coca cola are two liquids known to soften dental enamel.
    There are consumer reports that some of the whitening agents for teeth
    also soften enamel.

    I am not sure how this is relavent.

    I can see that you would feel that way. Avoid at all costs plausible
    alternatives to your hypothesis that ketosis caused the softening of
    your teeth. There are perhaps a half dozen known reasons for softening
    of teeth. Since it isn't my symptom, I haven't been very thorough in
    looking it up.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The connections between ordinary diet KETOSIS (not DIABETIC
    KETOACIDOSIS) and other diseases fail to crop up on short searches on
    Google. Diabetic ketoacidosis (with diabetes) certainly has known
    effects on the eye and general risks for several other organs.

    Please post any links you have to evidence for *dietary* *ketosis*
    causing the organ damage to which you refer.

    My experience is on the animal rather than human side. It is well
    known that acute dietry ketosis can be fatal, and is known as Twin
    Lamb Disease [1] in sheep. It is obviouly a very different case to
    cronic ketosis in a low carb diet. I shall try and find something
    more relavent, but the fact that some forms of ketosis are damaging
    surely means it is not totally stupid to cosider the risk of inducing
    another form.

    As I say, I sure the atkins is very good for many people, I have just
    choosen not to go down that road at this time. If the GI diet is not
    low carb enough for the question to be OT in this forum then fair
    enough, but to call me an idiot and suggest rather dramatic measures
    seems a bit over the top.

    [1] http://www.pipevet.com/articles/Pregnancy%20Ketosis.htm

    You could address the "idiot calling" to the specific individual who did
    so. It was not I. Unless you wish to use the broad brush of tar
    approach and blame everybody here for what one person does to you.

    ========================================================================

    Humans appear to be able to have twins without dying from the Twin Lamb
    Disease type of starved ketosis. So, surely, if you aren't having
    twins, then the animal study is of pretty remote applicability. Also,
    sheep are ruminants, and humans aren't. As a specific matter of
    differentiation.

    Cross species comarisons are fraught with problems. For example,
    overfeeding herbifore rabbits with animal products such as protein or
    saturated fats or cholesterol lead to poor reactions of forced feeding.

    The information on this page leads to reasons to not believe that the
    Twin Lamb Disease issue has much relevance to humans. The "disease" is
    linked to poor performance of the rumen in sheep leading to the
    inability to eat enough for the abnormally high metabolic/macro-nutrient
    burden of a sheep having twins.
    http://www.farmersjournal.ie/2005/0305/farmmanagement/sheep/feature.shtml

    Rabbits fed unnatural high diets of cholesterol [animal product]
    resulted in cholesteric deposits, but that doesn't prove that
    cholesterol is dangerous to humans, just that cholesterol is dangerous
    to herbivor rabbits.

    Sheep are herbivores, and the high energy intake of animal fats would
    possibly not stave off their malnutrition in the "twin sheep" situation,
    but the high intake of fats and proteins normally associated with Low
    Carb diets in humans would allow very high energy inputs.

    Sometimes apples and oranges have similarities, but sometimes one must
    admit they have differences.

    Sorry to not have any highly accurate GI data to give you.

    Whatever you do, I wish you well.

    I would suggest that you avoid having twins during your weight loss,
    just in case.

  7. Jim said:
    Quoted message said:
    Jim said:

    Lemon juice and coca cola are two liquids known to soften dental enamel.
    There are consumer reports that some of the whitening agents for teeth
    also soften enamel.

    Quoted message said:

    I am not sure how this is relavent.

    I can see that you would feel that way. Avoid at all costs plausible
    alternatives to your hypothesis that ketosis caused the softening of
    your teeth. There are perhaps a half dozen known reasons for softening
    of teeth. Since it isn't my symptom, I haven't been very thorough in
    looking it up.

    I was saying that it is not relavent. I consume neither coca cola or
    significant amounts of lemon juice, but I was ketotic. As I
    understand ketosis CAN cause softening of the teeth I blamed that. It
    was completely unscientific but it is one of those decisions one has
    to make in life without sufficent information.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The connections between ordinary diet KETOSIS (not DIABETIC
    KETOACIDOSIS) and other diseases fail to crop up on short searches on
    Google. Diabetic ketoacidosis (with diabetes) certainly has known
    effects on the eye and general risks for several other organs.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Please post any links you have to evidence for *dietary* *ketosis*
    causing the organ damage to which you refer.

    Quoted message said:

    My experience is on the animal rather than human side. It is well
    known that acute dietry ketosis can be fatal, and is known as Twin
    Lamb Disease [1] in sheep. It is obviouly a very different case to
    cronic ketosis in a low carb diet. I shall try and find something
    more relavent, but the fact that some forms of ketosis are damaging
    surely means it is not totally stupid to cosider the risk of inducing
    another form.

    Quoted message said:

    As I say, I sure the atkins is very good for many people, I have just
    choosen not to go down that road at this time. If the GI diet is not
    low carb enough for the question to be OT in this forum then fair
    enough, but to call me an idiot and suggest rather dramatic measures
    seems a bit over the top.

    Quoted message said:

    [1]http://www.pipevet.com/articles/Pregnancy%20Ketosis.htm

    You could address the "idiot calling" to the specific individual who did
    so. It was not I. Unless you wish to use the broad brush of tar
    approach and blame everybody here for what one person does to you.

    I am very sorry, I did not notice you did no call me an idiot etc.

    Quoted message said:


    ========================================================================

    Humans appear to be able to have twins without dying from the Twin Lamb
    Disease type of starved ketosis. So, surely, if you aren't having
    twins, then the animal study is of pretty remote applicability. Also,
    sheep are ruminants, and humans aren't. As a specific matter of
    differentiation.

    Cross species comarisons are fraught with problems. For example,
    overfeeding herbifore rabbits with animal products such as protein or
    saturated fats or cholesterol lead to poor reactions of forced feeding.

    The information on this page leads to reasons to not believe that the
    Twin Lamb Disease issue has much relevance to humans. The "disease" is
    linked to poor performance of the rumen in sheep leading to the
    inability to eat enough for the abnormally high metabolic/macro-nutrient
    burden of a sheep having twins.http://www.farmersjournal.ie/2005/0305/farmmanagement/sheep/feature.s...

    Indeed the CAUSE of the ketosis is quite inappicable to humans.
    However what I am talking about is the effects of ketosis on the body,
    and I see no reason why that should be significantly different in
    humnas. The big difference in this case is the time scale and level
    of the ketosis (in twin lamb disease it is extremly high levels of
    kwetones and will only last for a short period). I was just using
    that as an example of dangerous dietry ketosis.

    Quoted message said:

    Sheep are herbivores, and the high energy intake of animal fats would
    possibly not stave off their malnutrition in the "twin sheep" situation,
    but the high intake of fats and proteins normally associated with Low
    Carb diets in humans would allow very high energy inputs.

    The main thing is that the feotus requires significant amounts of
    glucose, which can not be provided from fats.

    Quoted message said:

    Sometimes apples and oranges have similarities, but sometimes one must
    admit they have differences.

    Sorry to not have any highly accurate GI data to give you.

    Whatever you do, I wish you well.

    I would suggest that you avoid having twins during your weight loss,
    just in case.

    Thank you for your kind words.

  8. Jim said:
    Quoted message said:
    Jim said:

    Lemon juice and coca cola are two liquids known to soften dental enamel.
    There are consumer reports that some of the whitening agents for teeth
    also soften enamel.

    Quoted message said:

    I am not sure how this is relavent.

    I can see that you would feel that way. Avoid at all costs plausible
    alternatives to your hypothesis that ketosis caused the softening of
    your teeth. There are perhaps a half dozen known reasons for softening
    of teeth. Since it isn't my symptom, I haven't been very thorough in
    looking it up.

    I was saying that it is not relavent. I consume neither coca cola or
    significant amounts of lemon juice, but I was ketotic. As I
    understand ketosis CAN cause softening of the teeth I blamed that. It
    was completely unscientific but it is one of those decisions one has
    to make in life without sufficent information.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The connections between ordinary diet KETOSIS (not DIABETIC
    KETOACIDOSIS) and other diseases fail to crop up on short searches on
    Google. Diabetic ketoacidosis (with diabetes) certainly has known
    effects on the eye and general risks for several other organs.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Please post any links you have to evidence for *dietary* *ketosis*
    causing the organ damage to which you refer.

    Quoted message said:

    My experience is on the animal rather than human side. It is well
    known that acute dietry ketosis can be fatal, and is known as Twin
    Lamb Disease [1] in sheep. It is obviouly a very different case to
    cronic ketosis in a low carb diet. I shall try and find something
    more relavent, but the fact that some forms of ketosis are damaging
    surely means it is not totally stupid to cosider the risk of inducing
    another form.

    Quoted message said:

    As I say, I sure the atkins is very good for many people, I have just
    choosen not to go down that road at this time. If the GI diet is not
    low carb enough for the question to be OT in this forum then fair
    enough, but to call me an idiot and suggest rather dramatic measures
    seems a bit over the top.

    Quoted message said:

    [1]http://www.pipevet.com/articles/Pregnancy%20Ketosis.htm

    You could address the "idiot calling" to the specific individual who did
    so. It was not I. Unless you wish to use the broad brush of tar
    approach and blame everybody here for what one person does to you.

    I am very sorry, I did not notice you did no call me an idiot etc.

    Quoted message said:


    ========================================================================

    Humans appear to be able to have twins without dying from the Twin Lamb
    Disease type of starved ketosis. So, surely, if you aren't having
    twins, then the animal study is of pretty remote applicability. Also,
    sheep are ruminants, and humans aren't. As a specific matter of
    differentiation.

    Cross species comarisons are fraught with problems. For example,
    overfeeding herbifore rabbits with animal products such as protein or
    saturated fats or cholesterol lead to poor reactions of forced feeding.

    The information on this page leads to reasons to not believe that the
    Twin Lamb Disease issue has much relevance to humans. The "disease" is
    linked to poor performance of the rumen in sheep leading to the
    inability to eat enough for the abnormally high metabolic/macro-nutrient
    burden of a sheep having twins.http://www.farmersjournal.ie/2005/0305/farmmanagement/sheep/feature.s...

    Indeed the CAUSE of the ketosis is quite inappicable to humans.
    However what I am talking about is the effects of ketosis on the body,
    and I see no reason why that should be significantly different in
    humnas. The big difference in this case is the time scale and level
    of the ketosis (in twin lamb disease it is extremly high levels of
    kwetones and will only last for a short period). I was just using
    that as an example of dangerous dietry ketosis.

    Quoted message said:

    Sheep are herbivores, and the high energy intake of animal fats would
    possibly not stave off their malnutrition in the "twin sheep" situation,
    but the high intake of fats and proteins normally associated with Low
    Carb diets in humans would allow very high energy inputs.

    The main thing is that the feotus requires significant amounts of
    glucose, which can not be provided from fats.

    Quoted message said:

    Sometimes apples and oranges have similarities, but sometimes one must
    admit they have differences.

    Sorry to not have any highly accurate GI data to give you.

    Whatever you do, I wish you well.

    I would suggest that you avoid having twins during your weight loss,
    just in case.

    Thank you for your kind words.

  9. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jim said:


    Quoted message said:

    I am not sure how this is relavent.


    I very sory, I did not notice you did no call me an idiot etc.

    We can only hope that you've not reproduced.

  10. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jim said:


    Quoted message said:

    I am not sure how this is relavent.


    I very sory, I did not notice you did no call me an idiot etc.

    We can only hope that you've not reproduced.

  11. Hi Hugh,

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    I am considering going on the low GI diet.

    The concept is interesting, but in my years of reading on the subject of
    diets and dieting, I have never come across anything that I would want to
    pass along. As I understand things, a gram of carbs = a gram of sugar and
    you can't powder coat that (sic) by saying Sugar A has a lower GI than B.

    Bottom line: if you're wanting to lose weight it is the calories that count.
    If you want to eat healthy, cut the crappy sugary foods out of your diet,
    *especially* bread, spaghetti, rice, etc.

    Quoted message said:

    I went on the Atkins a few
    years ago and I found it useful, but I have decided it may be too
    unhealthy.

    It sounds like you haven't done much reading on the subject. I've never
    heard of anybody having any health problems whatsoever for following a well
    researched low-carb diet.

    For the most part, people on low-carb diets for two reasons: lc diets such
    as Atkins, Protein Power, et al, are healthy, and they bring your hunger
    under control so that your body regulates your input rather than you having
    to count calories.

    Losing weight (for those who need to do so), is a side effect of healthy
    eating habits.

    Mike

  12. Hi Hugh,

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    I am considering going on the low GI diet.

    The concept is interesting, but in my years of reading on the subject of
    diets and dieting, I have never come across anything that I would want to
    pass along. As I understand things, a gram of carbs = a gram of sugar and
    you can't powder coat that (sic) by saying Sugar A has a lower GI than B.

    Bottom line: if you're wanting to lose weight it is the calories that count.
    If you want to eat healthy, cut the crappy sugary foods out of your diet,
    *especially* bread, spaghetti, rice, etc.

    Quoted message said:

    I went on the Atkins a few
    years ago and I found it useful, but I have decided it may be too
    unhealthy.

    It sounds like you haven't done much reading on the subject. I've never
    heard of anybody having any health problems whatsoever for following a well
    researched low-carb diet.

    For the most part, people on low-carb diets for two reasons: lc diets such
    as Atkins, Protein Power, et al, are healthy, and they bring your hunger
    under control so that your body regulates your input rather than you having
    to count calories.

    Losing weight (for those who need to do so), is a side effect of healthy
    eating habits.

    Mike

  13. em said:

    Hi Hugh,

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    Quoted message said:

    I am considering going on the low GI diet.

    The concept is interesting, but in my years of reading on the subject of
    diets and dieting, I have never come across anything that I would want to
    pass along. As I understand things, a gram of carbs = a gram of sugar and
    you can't powder coat that (sic) by saying Sugar A has a lower GI than B.

    Bottom line: if you're wanting to lose weight it is the calories that count.
    If you want to eat healthy, cut the crappy sugary foods out of your diet,
    *especially* bread, spaghetti, rice, etc.

    Quoted message said:

    I went on the Atkins a few
    years ago and I found it useful, but I have decided it may be too
    unhealthy.

    It sounds like you haven't done much reading on the subject. I've never
    heard of anybody having any health problems whatsoever for following a well
    researched low-carb diet.

    I thought it was less lack of reaserch than lack of ability to eat
    what I would like at work, but perhaps you arre right.

    Quoted message said:

    For the most part, people on low-carb diets for two reasons: lc diets such
    as Atkins, Protein Power, et al, are healthy, and they bring your hunger
    under control so that your body regulates your input rather than you having
    to count calories.

    That is the reason I am interested in the low GI diet. As I
    understand it the insulin realeased from carbohydres stimultes
    appetite, so a lower GI diet would bring the hunger under control in a
    similar way to the atkins (though not as much I guess).

    Quoted message said:

    Losing weight (for those who need to do so), is a side effect of healthy
    eating habits.

    Quite.

  14. Quoted message said:

    Of course I could be wrong, but I do not belive that considering the
    risk is idiotic.

    When fat is burned by the body, it produces ketones.

    There's simply no way on any diet to lose weight without ketones.

    --
    http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

  15. Jackie Patti said:
    Quoted message said:

    Of course I could be wrong, but I do not belive that considering the
    risk is idiotic.

    When fat is burned by the body, it produces ketones.

    There's simply no way on any diet to lose weight without ketones.

    That is not correct. Normally fats are utilized by convertion to the
    constituent fatty acids and glycerol, and these are used by the
    muscles (through a very complicated proccess involving the
    lipoprotiens (LDL and HDL). Ketones are produced when you do not have
    enough glucose stored in the liver and you need another energy source
    for the brain.

  16. Quoted message said:

    Does anyone have any sujestions for good sources of GI values of
    foods? It is important to me that it is usable, but more important is
    trustable. If it had references that would make trustable, but any
    suggestions would be great. I belive I have a reasnoble idea of the
    science of nutrition from a biological degree and further reading over
    some years.

    GI values vary tremendously from one person to the next; the lists
    provided by various sources show average results.

    If you really want to diet based on the effect of foods on blood
    glucose, you need to do what diabetics do:
    http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm

    Because our response to different foods varies, that's the only useful
    way to measure GI effects.

    --
    http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

  17. Jackie Patti said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sheep are herbivores, and the high energy intake of animal fats would
    possibly not stave off their malnutrition in the "twin sheep" situation,
    but the high intake of fats and proteins normally associated with Low
    Carb diets in humans would allow very high energy inputs.

    Quoted message said:

    The main thing is that the feotus requires significant amounts of
    glucose, which can not be provided from fats.

    You *are* aware that those with gestational diabetes have very tightly
    controlled diet and insulin use to prevent high glucose levels, which
    are known to damage the fetus? As far as I know, no one tries to reduce
    ketones during their treatment; the important bit is keeping glucose
    levels from being damaging to the baby.

    Glucose is necessary for life, but no one has too little - that disease
    doesn't exist as far as I know. What exists is significant damage due
    to elevated bg and the corresponding elevated serum insulin.

    That disease does exist for sheep (perhaps more correctly a shortage
    of kreps cycle intermidiates, but it amounts to the same thing). It
    probably exists in parts of the world where malnutrition is more of a
    problem than obesety. I would not be supprised if it not known in
    this country.

    Quoted message said:

    Sheep are on a diet consisting of grasses and legumes. If you are
    concerned about the effect of their diet, I suggest you not eat too much
    pasture. 😉

    I shall just point out that that was just an example of nutrional
    ketosis causing a problem, I am not worried by it for myself.

  18. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sheep are herbivores, and the high energy intake of animal fats would
    possibly not stave off their malnutrition in the "twin sheep" situation,
    but the high intake of fats and proteins normally associated with Low
    Carb diets in humans would allow very high energy inputs.

    The main thing is that the feotus requires significant amounts of
    glucose, which can not be provided from fats.

    You *are* aware that those with gestational diabetes have very tightly
    controlled diet and insulin use to prevent high glucose levels, which
    are known to damage the fetus? As far as I know, no one tries to reduce
    ketones during their treatment; the important bit is keeping glucose
    levels from being damaging to the baby.

    Glucose is necessary for life, but no one has too little - that disease
    doesn't exist as far as I know. What exists is significant damage due
    to elevated bg and the corresponding elevated serum insulin.

    Sheep are on a diet consisting of grasses and legumes. If you are
    concerned about the effect of their diet, I suggest you not eat too much
    pasture. 😉

    --
    http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

  19. Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    I am considering going on the low GI diet. I went on the Atkins a few
    years ago and I found it useful, but I have decided it may be too
    unhealthy. I want to find reliable figures for GI values of foods.
    Have found this [1] database, from the university of Sydney but it
    gives very varied results [2] and no references. I have a book [3]
    but it is completely unreferenced, does not give values and has some
    odd choices for the red, yellow and green columns [4].

    Does anyone have any sujestions for good sources of GI values of
    foods? It is important to me that it is usable, but more important is
    trustable. If it had references that would make trustable, but any
    suggestions would be great. I belive I have a reasnoble idea of the
    science of nutrition from a biological degree and further reading over
    some years.

    [1]http://www.glycemicindex.com/
    [2]
    Potato, Russet Burbank, baked without fat (Canada) 56
    Potato, Russet Burbank, baked without fat (USA) 111
    [3] the Gi DIET Rick Gallop 0-7535-0775-7
    [4] hard margarine, vegetable fat in red, rapeseed and olive oil in
    green (other than the omega 3/6 levels which have little to do with
    wieght loss, these are almost identical nutrionally).
    Broad beans in red, boiled new potatoes in green.
    Grapes, which are far higher than other fruits in free sugars are in
    green.
    Ravioli and tortellini are in red, most other pastas are in green.
    When I make these things, pretty much the exact same ingedients go
    into them, and they are cooked for a similar time so why should the
    fact the the sauce is inside the pasta make any difference.

    Thanks for any help,

    Hugh

    HELLO FRIEND HELP IS ON THE WAY STOP WORRIING. I MIGHT HAVE THE
    ANSWERS TO YOU PROBLEM. HAVE YOU HERD OF THE MANGOSTEEN FRUIT? THIS
    FRUIT IS FORM THAILAND AND IT IS DOING AMAZING THINGS FOR PEOPLE. HERE
    ARE SOME WEBSITES YOU CAN GOTO AND DO SOME RESEARCH ON THIS FRUIT .
    WWW.DEMO.XPOWERPRO.COM WHEN YOU GET THERE CLICK ON THE GET STARTED NOW
    BOTTON THE CLICK ON PROSPECT TOUR DEMO BOTTON. AND YOU CAN ALSO VISIT
    WWW.CREATEMYSUCCESS.COM/JIMHURD/WEBCAST IF YOU WANT YOU CAN E-MAIL ME
    AT [email hidden] AND LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU THINK THANKS
    AND MAY GOD BLESS YOU AND YOURS

  20. Utter nonsense.

    Go read Jim's explanation.

    My 2 cents is to suggest looking at GL, and ignoring GI.

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    jcderkoeing said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    Quoted message said:

    I am considering going on the low GI diet. I went on the Atkins a few
    years ago and I found it useful, but I have decided it may be too
    unhealthy.

    You're an idiot.

    Go remove yourself from the gene pool.

    HTH

    Why? I am aware of the advantages of the attkins, and I am sure that
    for many people the weight loss on the atkins would significantly
    increase their life expectancy. But to deny that there is any risk is
    dishonest. I worried most about the ketosis. I found it impostble to
    go a long working day without getting ketotic. The risks of long term
    ketosis are significant, in particular eye damage and vasculitis. I
    blame the ketosis for softening my teeth, as I broke a tooth on a pork
    scratching that I am sure would not have been a problem prior to
    goiing on the atkins.

    Of course I could be wrong, but I do not belive that considering the
    risk is idiotic.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.