"Tony B" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:
[email protected]...
> Andrew wrote:
>> On 4 Jun, 07:45, Tony Raven <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_east/6716199.stm
>>>
>> "He also told the jury they would have to consider whether it was safe
>> for cyclists to be out."
>
> When will he be telling them they will have to consider whether it was
> safe for the driver to be out?
>
> I see now he's also highlighting expert witness testimony that removes all
> reason for one to have legal tyres on one's vehicle:
>
> "Motorist Robert Harris, 47, from Abergele, was fined £180 with £35 costs
> last August and given six points on his licence after admitting having
> defective tyres.
>
> The court heard that the defective tyres were not a factor in the
> accident.
>
> The coroner said: "Experts say it matters not whether the tyres were bald
> or brand new. It's a question of ice on the road."
>
> It's looking very shoddy so far, day one of a four-person inquest and he's
> already directing the jury toward accidental death with contributory
> negligence to the victims for having the temerity to go out.
>
> *******.
>
> Tony B
Lot's of bad stuff here. Starting with the idiot copper at the site
appearing to absolve this driver of blame - before his own investigators
were finished, through the ridiculous long length of time to this inquest
and the fact this driver was not even required to attend court when in truth
his car should not have been on the road at all.
That last truth is what this jury should be considering, not whether the
Rhyl Club should have set out. If that is a possibility we ought to
consider only going out in summer to avoid contributory negligence
assertions.
This really does seem to me to represent grossly biased directions, even
misconduct by this coroner.
Four dead, perfectly blameless men and all road users deserve an even
handed, unbiased hearing, not this bunch of tripe.
John
www.calder-clarion.co.uk