R
Roger Merriman
Guest
Simon Brooke <[email protected]> wrote:
> in message <1i2dus7.1u7cuwlpfi0ljN%[email protected]>, Roger Merriman
> ('[email protected]') wrote:
>
> > Adam Lea <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> "Simon Brooke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> > in message <[email protected]>, Ben C
> >> > ('[email protected]') wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If there's a pothole in the road, don't ride into it!
> >>
> >> That is like telling an insomniac to get some sleep, or telling someone
> >> with clinical depression to pull themselves together. Nobody deliberatly
> >> rides into potholes, but there are times when you will accidentally hit
> >> one, usually night time commuting when you have the lights from oncoming
> >> traffic reducing the contrast of the surroundings.
> >>
> >> I commute about 12 miles mainly on unclassified country roads. On the
> >> wider roads (i.e. not single track) the roads are virtually pothole
> >> free. I agree that expecting them to be super smooth is unrealistic and
> >> I don't expect them to be, but I do expect to be able to navigate them
> >> without being thrown off my bike.
> >>
> >> The last mile of my commute is up a single track road which is full of
> >> potholes. Of course, I know they are there and take extra care as a
> >> result, but people at work have had their cars damaged as a result of
> >> these potholes which again, I don't think is acceptable.
> >
> > true but more than likely in simons case and in where my folks live, the
> > coucil will cover a massive area, so the cost of keeping the road
> > network is high, though unless simon lives in tourist area traffic is
> > likely to be low.
> >
> > the roads of sw london and surrey are in lot better state. but then they
> > have much higher traffic, and smaller area to cover. they are also a
> > darn site richer.
>
> Just so. We have 23 people per square kilometer. Surrey has 644. I'm
> prepared to bet we have more kilometers of road. The average gross wage
> here is £12,192; in Surrey it's £30,600. So each council tax payer here is
> paying for a lot more road than in Surrey, out of a lot less income.
>
> There are advantages. I can go for a fifty mile ride without seeing a
> moving motor vehicle; it's quite normal, provided you stay out of the
> towns, to see more bikes than cars. And the scenery is world class. And
> the roads, too, are currently world class - but I don't think that's good
> value for money, given the needs of our community.
to be honest don't see many bikes on the roads in south wales, but then
it's not with in easy reach of big towns or cities.
the counties due west ie the welsh valleys which also ahve some fairly
worn roads have so many problems that roads is the least of their
worries.
roger
--
www.rogermerriman.com
> in message <1i2dus7.1u7cuwlpfi0ljN%[email protected]>, Roger Merriman
> ('[email protected]') wrote:
>
> > Adam Lea <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> "Simon Brooke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> > in message <[email protected]>, Ben C
> >> > ('[email protected]') wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If there's a pothole in the road, don't ride into it!
> >>
> >> That is like telling an insomniac to get some sleep, or telling someone
> >> with clinical depression to pull themselves together. Nobody deliberatly
> >> rides into potholes, but there are times when you will accidentally hit
> >> one, usually night time commuting when you have the lights from oncoming
> >> traffic reducing the contrast of the surroundings.
> >>
> >> I commute about 12 miles mainly on unclassified country roads. On the
> >> wider roads (i.e. not single track) the roads are virtually pothole
> >> free. I agree that expecting them to be super smooth is unrealistic and
> >> I don't expect them to be, but I do expect to be able to navigate them
> >> without being thrown off my bike.
> >>
> >> The last mile of my commute is up a single track road which is full of
> >> potholes. Of course, I know they are there and take extra care as a
> >> result, but people at work have had their cars damaged as a result of
> >> these potholes which again, I don't think is acceptable.
> >
> > true but more than likely in simons case and in where my folks live, the
> > coucil will cover a massive area, so the cost of keeping the road
> > network is high, though unless simon lives in tourist area traffic is
> > likely to be low.
> >
> > the roads of sw london and surrey are in lot better state. but then they
> > have much higher traffic, and smaller area to cover. they are also a
> > darn site richer.
>
> Just so. We have 23 people per square kilometer. Surrey has 644. I'm
> prepared to bet we have more kilometers of road. The average gross wage
> here is £12,192; in Surrey it's £30,600. So each council tax payer here is
> paying for a lot more road than in Surrey, out of a lot less income.
>
> There are advantages. I can go for a fifty mile ride without seeing a
> moving motor vehicle; it's quite normal, provided you stay out of the
> towns, to see more bikes than cars. And the scenery is world class. And
> the roads, too, are currently world class - but I don't think that's good
> value for money, given the needs of our community.
to be honest don't see many bikes on the roads in south wales, but then
it's not with in easy reach of big towns or cities.
the counties due west ie the welsh valleys which also ahve some fairly
worn roads have so many problems that roads is the least of their
worries.
roger
--
www.rogermerriman.com