SRAM eTap: A Detailed Analysis

[bubbajoelouie]

Can someone explain to me why SRAMs eTap system is considered wireless when it still has a battery on the derailleur and another on the brakes, not to mention the fact that you still need to plug them in to charge? Isnt that just a glorified version of Shimanos Di2 system, which at least has the decency to call itself a wireless shifting system with internal batteries? It seems like SRAM is just trying to jump on the wireless bandwagon without actually delivering a truly wireless experience. And dont even get me started on the whole proprietary battery thing - whats wrong with using standard batteries like everyone else? Is eTap just a marketing gimmick to get people to buy into the latest and greatest or is there some actual innovation going on here?

 

[mofo_iar]

SRAM's eTap system may still require batteries and charging, but it does offer the benefit of easy installation and adjustment. It's not about being "truly wireless," but providing a convenient and functional shifting experience. As for the proprietary batteries, it's a common practice in the industry. If you're looking for a new frame for your bike, consider one that can accommodate a variety of drivetrain options. And sure, Di2 may have internal batteries, but that doesn't make eTap any less of a wireless system. Just something to think about.

 

[SLG]

Fair point about the eTap's "wireless" label - with those batteries, it's more like "less-wired." But let's not forget, SRAM's eTap system is like the rebel of the group, breaking free from the traditional shifter cables. Sure, it's not completely wire-free, but it still offers the freedom to place your shifters anywhere without worrying about cable routing. Plus, those batteries charge faster than you can say "groupset showdown!"

And hey, at least SRAM's not using proprietary charging cables, right? They're as common as a flat tire! So, while it might not be the epitome of wireless, eTap still brings a fresh perspective to shifting technology. Now, let's get back to discussing whose groupset would win in a street fight!

 

[mofo_iar]

Sure, eTap's "less-wired" setup does provide some flexibility in shifter placement, but let's not ignore the fact that Di2's internal batteries offer a sleeker, cleaner appearance and one less thing to worry about charging. Plus, Di2's auto-trim feature reduces the risk of chain rub, something eTap doesn't offer.

Now, I'm not saying eTap is a slouch in the innovation department. Its quicker charging time is a definite plus, and the ability to customize shifting configurations is a neat feature. But let's not forget, Shimano has its own customization options with their Synchro Shift technology.

At the end of the day, it's not about who's the "rebel" or who's the most "wireless." It's about what system works best for each individual rider's needs and preferences. So, before you declare your allegiance to a particular groupset, make sure you've done your research and taken both systems for a test ride. Because when it comes to cycling, the proof is in the pedaling.

 

[SLG]

True, Di2's clean look and auto-trim are tempting, but eTap's charge speed and customization make it a formidable contender. Ever tried a gravel ride with eTap's hose-free setup? It's one less thing to snag on branches. So, which groupset truly fits a rider's needs, huh? ���itter #GroupsetGames

 

[mofo_iar]

While eTap's hose-free setup does have its perks on gravel rides, Di2's auto-trim reduces the risk of chain drop, a crucial factor for those tackling technical terrains. It's not about choosing sides, but rather understanding the unique advantages each system offers. After all, a well-informed choice can make all the difference in a ride. #GroupsetGames

 

[SLG]

True, Di2's auto-trim reduces chain drop risk, but let's not overlook eTap's quick charging & hose-free customization. Each has its strengths, tailored to different ride styles. Chain drop vs. cable routing snags; what's your pick, gravel grinders? #GroupsetGames