wafflycat wrote:
>
> "kot" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > wafflycat wrote:
> >>
> >> http://eclectech.co.uk/mindcontrol.php
> >>
> >> Cheers, helen s
> >
> > Is there any chance that you could be courteous enough to put a brief
> > description of content to your links?
>
> Errr... tin-foil hat???
Is that something to do with cycling?
I was just hoping you might be a little more helpful. Sorry.
"kot" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> wafflycat wrote:
>>
>> "kot" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > wafflycat wrote:
>> >>
>> >> http://eclectech.co.uk/mindcontrol.php
>> >>
>> >> Cheers, helen s
>> >
>> > Is there any chance that you could be courteous enough to put a brief
>> > description of content to your links?
>>
>> Errr... tin-foil hat???
>
> Is that something to do with cycling?
> I was just hoping you might be a little more helpful. Sorry.
Going by Helen's previous posts, it's almost certainly nothing to do with
cycling, and is probably something she finds amusing. <clicks> Yup, right
first time. Ok, maybe an OT would have been suitable, but I'm not really
complaining.
(I didn't have the sound on, so that could have mentioned bikes - but it's
not terribly important).
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:33:47 +0100, "wafflycat"
<waffles*$*A**T*v21net$*££*D*O*T*co*D£$£*O*T*uk> wrote:
>http://eclectech.co.uk/mindcontrol.php
>
>Cheers, helen s
"Clive George" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Going by Helen's previous posts, it's almost certainly nothing to do with
> cycling, and is probably something she finds amusing. <clicks> Yup, right
> first time. Ok, maybe an OT would have been suitable, but I'm not really
> complaining.
>
> (I didn't have the sound on, so that could have mentioned bikes - but it's
> not terribly important).
>
> clive
>
Apology - thought I'd done the OT bit. My fault.
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:00:29 +0100, Clive George wrote:
> (I didn't have the sound on,
That has been standard practice for me for following links from URC ever
since a certain Mr Chapman lured me to a link which shouted "Spoon
Menace!!!" across my office, much to my embarassment and everyone else's
confusion.
> That has been standard practice for me for following links from URC ever
> since a certain Mr Chapman lured me to a link which shouted "Spoon
> Menace!!!" across my office, much to my embarassment and everyone else's
> confusion.
Aha, the Spoonguard, for happy kittens.
<URL:http://www.alex-veitch.com/joel/flash/spoonguard.swf>
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:35:16 GMT, Mark Thompson wrote:
>> That has been standard practice for me for following links from URC ever
>> since a certain Mr Chapman lured me to a link which shouted "Spoon
>> Menace!!!" across my office, much to my embarassment and everyone else's
>> confusion.
>
> Aha, the Spoonguard, for happy kittens.
> <URL:http://www.alex-veitch.com/joel/flash/spoonguard.swf>
>
> Probably recommended for badgers too.
Nope, not falling for *that* one again, thank you very much!