What kind of races are titanium bikes good for? How come there were no Litespeeds or Merlins in the Tour de France?
Possibly in the past. This year they were Scott CR1's.Eden said:Don't know if its true, but I heard a rumor the neutral service bikes in the Tour are Litespeeds? of course I guess that doesn't necessarily mean that they are Ti either?
artmichalek said:The Postal team rode the time trials in the 1999 Tour de France on Litespeeds painted to look like Treks.
Magnus Backstedt won the 2004 Paris Roubaix on a Bianchi S9. It was the prototype version without the carbon seat stays. This is probably the kind of race that titanium frames are best suited for.
Ryan Cooper said:What kind of races are titanium bikes good for? How come there were no Litespeeds or Merlins in the Tour de France?
I have two - Over here in the NL they are a Super-exotic. Kind of fun having grown adults asking premission to touch themfrusso said:That’s why I love my Litespeed. When I’m participating in our locale races or our weekly group rides I’m usually the only one riding a Litespeed. I’ve also replaced the black seat post with a silver Dura Ace and with my Mavic Ksyrium SL, Nice
The problem with titanium is that it simply does not give you the most bang for your buck. Why on earth would I want a Ti Litespeed that weighs in at 16.5lbs for $5000-6000 when I can get a carbon fiber Giant TCR at 15.5lbs for $2000-3000? Makes absolutely no sense to those who are aspiring racers without much scratch to throw around. Aka the high school, college, or recent collegiate graduates. Those are the guys who are going to be buying the bikes in the future.Hookyrider said:I have two - Over here in the NL they are a Super-exotic. Kind of fun having grown adults asking premission to touch them
Bottom line I felt they were the most bang for my buck...
Lately though (especially for 05) most of the Tour Teams have had Carbon or Carbon/Al frames, I'd have to look through my GE Kicker magazine to see who had what, but one team was riding Carbon/Ti - Decathalon maybe. Ti-Triangle CF stays and fork, if memory serves.
it was nice to see Litspeed fire back with the new ultra light G-frame this year http://www.litespeed.com/bikes/2006/road/ghisallo_.aspx
and these guys show that Ti is still lightweight - Carbon is just getting it's time in the spot light.
http://www.fairwheelbikes.com/gallery.html
HR
I guess this shows when I bought my bikes... a few years ago when Carbon wasn't where it is today... Ti was king, or at least still something that represented the most bang for the buck to me. My road machine weighs in right at 16 pounds, and my Hardtail MTB weighs only a little more than my old Bob Jackson 531C road machine (21.5lbs). I got incredible deals on both or I would have bought something else.Las Montañas said:The problem with titanium is that it simply does not give you the most bang for your buck.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.