Whats the BEST mtb HARDTAIL that you have ever ridden.....?

[paul_in_toronto]

Just taking a poll to work out some geometry and size issues..

Whats the best hardtail frame that you have ever ridden?
-What size? Sloping top tube?
- Frame material?
- Your height? Your inseam?
- Any special features of the frame?
- Front suspension? Rigid fork?

 

[Sorni]

John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:09:44 +1100, paul_in_toronto
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Just taking a poll to work out some geometry and size issues..
>>
>> -What size?

> 17inches is the best size.

17.5 is better.

 

[John Forrest Tomlinson]

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:09:44 +1100, paul_in_toronto
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Just taking a poll to work out some geometry and size issues..
>
>-What size?

17inches is the best size.

JT

****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

 

[Phil, Squid-in-Training]

Sorni wrote:
> John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:09:44 +1100, paul_in_toronto
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Just taking a poll to work out some geometry and size issues..
>>>
>>> -What size?
>
>> 17inches is the best size.
>
> 17.5 is better.

13 all the way.
--
Phil, Squid-in-Training

 

[[email protected]]

I have a thick 12.5

 

[Kinky Cowboy]

On 18 Mar 2006 10:06:50 -0800, [email protected] wrote:

>I have a thick 12.5

I get no complaints with my 14 incher

Kinky Cowboy*

*Batteries not included
May contain traces of nuts
Your milage may vary

 

[Werehatrack]

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:46:48 +0000, Kinky Cowboy <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 18 Mar 2006 10:06:50 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>I have a thick 12.5
>
>I get no complaints with my 14 incher

Y'all must be shrimps. Nothing below 21 inches counts.
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

 

[andresmuro]

Werehatrack wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:46:48 +0000, Kinky Cowboy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >On 18 Mar 2006 10:06:50 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> >>I have a thick 12.5
> >
> >I get no complaints with my 14 incher
>
> Y'all must be shrimps. Nothing below 21 inches counts.

With that, you don't even need a saddle. You can sit confortably on it.
With the proper stimulation, you won't even need a seatpost. Imagine
all the weight that you can save.

Andres

 

[Werehatrack]

On 19 Mar 2006 01:14:38 -0800, "andresmuro" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>Werehatrack wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:46:48 +0000, Kinky Cowboy <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 18 Mar 2006 10:06:50 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>> >
>> >>I have a thick 12.5
>> >
>> >I get no complaints with my 14 incher
>>
>> Y'all must be shrimps. Nothing below 21 inches counts.
>
>With that, you don't even need a saddle. You can sit confortably on it.
>With the proper stimulation, you won't even need a seatpost. Imagine
>all the weight that you can save.

Feller, I was talkin' about the *bike*.
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

 

[Dave Larrington]

In article <[email protected]>, Werehatrack
([email protected]) wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:46:48 +0000, Kinky Cowboy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >On 18 Mar 2006 10:06:50 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> >>I have a thick 12.5
> >
> >I get no complaints with my 14 incher
>
> Y'all must be shrimps. Nothing below 21 inches counts.

I had a 23 once, but that was when dinosaurs stalked the earth.

--
Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
I started out with nothing and I still have most of it left.