On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 05:17:32 GMT, "John Wayne Hussein" <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought I was the only one miffed by the new format . Thoughless and stupid "C-Trail" ,
> "G-Trail" prefixes are REALLY dumb . The upside is that there are now rating for difficulty and
> arobic challenge which will be useful was more people provide input .
>
> The location ( town/city) should be first .
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Click here for Free Video!!
http://www.gohip.com/free_video/
>
> "Penny S." <
[email protected]> wrote in message
>
news:[email protected]...
> > Pete scribbled :
> > > "Penny S." <
[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >
news:[email protected]...
> > >> they changed the format and now it's really hard to use. Really sucks
> > >> IMO... I know, should not be surprised. The old chart style was much easier to use.
> > >>
> > >
> > > gaaaaaa...that SUCKS.
> >
> > good it wasn't just me. And the locations are in parantheses... how easy
> it
> > that to read!!
> > >
> > > I don't want to look for trails by name, I want to look by location. If I don't know the trail
> > > names in an area...HTF am I supposed to find them?
> > >
> > > [example] TRAILS - Ohio View: Current Products | Include Older Products Sort Products:
> > > Alphabetically | by Best Rating | by Number of Reviews
> > > | by Price
> > >
> > > [long listing of trails, alpha by trailname]
> > >
> > > What chucklehead designed this abomination?
> >
> > some 19 year old college graduate with flash certifications no doubt.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > mtbr.com was marginal before, but this is just silly.
> > >
> > > Pete
You can still get the old format if you know the state and the name of the trail. For example:
<http://www.mtbr.com/trails/Missouri/CliffCaveCountyPark.html>
HTH.
--
J'm Sm'th To Reply Direct, Remove Clothes ..-.-